Understanding cardiac arrest dispatch of physician-paramedic critical care prehospital teams: a survey-based evaluation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sarah Morton, Chris Eagle, Scott Wallman, Gaynor Wareham, Rob Major, Christopher Edmunds, Sarah McLachlan
{"title":"Understanding cardiac arrest dispatch of physician-paramedic critical care prehospital teams: a survey-based evaluation.","authors":"Sarah Morton, Chris Eagle, Scott Wallman, Gaynor Wareham, Rob Major, Christopher Edmunds, Sarah McLachlan","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appropriate dispatch of critical care teams to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been identified as a research priority emergency care in the UK. The study aimed to understand the criteria informing the decision to dispatch a critical care physician-paramedic prehospital team to OHCA in one UK region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An invitation to participate in an anonymised online survey was sent by email to clinicians and non-clinicians working on the critical care (physician-paramedic) dispatch desk for the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust between June and July 2023. Demographic data relating to the experience of the dispatchers were collected alongside evaluating the effect of 15 predetermined criteria on OHCA dispatch (based on a pilot survey) on their decision to dispatch a physician-paramedic team. Responses to closed-end questions were calculated as percentages. A compulsory free text question on dispatching the physician-paramedic team was included. Free text data were interpreted by one author and the interpretation reviewed by all authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 respondents (19 critical care paramedics and one non-clinical dispatcher) participated, yielding a 79% response rate for clinical and 17% for non-clinical dispatchers. 'Witnessed cardiac arrest' and return of spontaneous circulation achieved on scene were criteria used by 100% of respondents in informing dispatch of a physician-paramedic team to OHCA. 10 of the 15 preidentified criteria were considered important in their decision-making by at least 75% of respondents. 'Age' was considered as more than just a number, instead incorporating both the nuances of a paediatric cardiac arrest and the importance of physiological reserve and frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The only 100% agreement in dispatch criteria was 'witnessed arrest'. Otherwise, variation existed and additional information, like identification of frailty, was gathered to support nuanced decision-making. Wider research across the UK would help identify factors and commonalities in OHCA physician-paramedic dispatch to target improved survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate dispatch of critical care teams to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been identified as a research priority emergency care in the UK. The study aimed to understand the criteria informing the decision to dispatch a critical care physician-paramedic prehospital team to OHCA in one UK region.

Methods: An invitation to participate in an anonymised online survey was sent by email to clinicians and non-clinicians working on the critical care (physician-paramedic) dispatch desk for the East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust between June and July 2023. Demographic data relating to the experience of the dispatchers were collected alongside evaluating the effect of 15 predetermined criteria on OHCA dispatch (based on a pilot survey) on their decision to dispatch a physician-paramedic team. Responses to closed-end questions were calculated as percentages. A compulsory free text question on dispatching the physician-paramedic team was included. Free text data were interpreted by one author and the interpretation reviewed by all authors.

Results: 20 respondents (19 critical care paramedics and one non-clinical dispatcher) participated, yielding a 79% response rate for clinical and 17% for non-clinical dispatchers. 'Witnessed cardiac arrest' and return of spontaneous circulation achieved on scene were criteria used by 100% of respondents in informing dispatch of a physician-paramedic team to OHCA. 10 of the 15 preidentified criteria were considered important in their decision-making by at least 75% of respondents. 'Age' was considered as more than just a number, instead incorporating both the nuances of a paediatric cardiac arrest and the importance of physiological reserve and frailty.

Conclusion: The only 100% agreement in dispatch criteria was 'witnessed arrest'. Otherwise, variation existed and additional information, like identification of frailty, was gathered to support nuanced decision-making. Wider research across the UK would help identify factors and commonalities in OHCA physician-paramedic dispatch to target improved survival rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信