CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 Are Potential Biomarkers for Musculoskeletal Infections.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Taiwo Samuel Agidigbi, Brianna Fram, Ilda Molloy, Matthew Riedel, Daniel Wiznia, Irvin Oh
{"title":"CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 Are Potential Biomarkers for Musculoskeletal Infections.","authors":"Taiwo Samuel Agidigbi, Brianna Fram, Ilda Molloy, Matthew Riedel, Daniel Wiznia, Irvin Oh","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomarkers of infection are measurable indicators that reflect the presence of an infection in the body. They are particularly valuable for detecting infections and tracking treatment responses. Previous transcriptome analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from patients during the active phase of diabetic foot infection identified the upregulation of several genes, including a neutrophil-specific cell surface glycoprotein, CD177, an Myb-related transcription factor 2 (MYBL2), and ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M2 (RRM2). We aimed to investigate whether these observations in diabetic foot infections could be extrapolated to other musculoskeletal infections.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Are the protein concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 elevated in serum or PBMCs of patients with musculoskeletal infections? (2) Do serum and PBMC concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 decrease in response to antibiotic therapy? (3) Can these biomarkers give diagnostic accuracy and differentiate patients with musculoskeletal infections from controls?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2023 to June 2024, we treated 26 patients presenting with clinical symptoms and signs of acute musculoskeletal infections, including elevated inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) and local changes such as swelling, erythema, tenderness or pain, warmth, purulent drainage, sinus tract, or wound leading to bone or hardware. Diagnosis included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), foot and ankle infection (FAI), fracture-related infection (FRI), and septic arthritis of the native joints. Patients with chronic recurrent osteomyelitis, PJI, or FRI were excluded from the study. Among the 26 patients deemed potentially eligible, 19% (5) were excluded for the following reasons: prison inmate (1), unable to provide consent because of severe sepsis (1), mental illness (1), and declined to participate (2). Of the 81% (21) of patients who provided consent, cultures from 9.5% (2) were negative. These two patients were ultimately diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis: gout (1) and rheumatoid arthritis (1); thus, the musculoskeletal infection group for analysis consisted of 73.1% (19 of 26) of patients. A control group of 21 patients undergoing elective foot or ankle deformity correction surgery without infections or systemic inflammation was included. Because foot or ankle deformity is highly unlikely to influence the immunologic profile of the subjects, we believed that these patients would serve as an appropriate control group. Other than the absence of infection and the lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus, the control group was comparable to the study group in terms of demographics and clinical factors, including age and sex distribution. We collected blood samples from both patients and controls and quantified CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 RNA transcription levels in the PBMC using qRT-PCR. We also assessed protein concentrations in the serum and PBMC using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A comparative analysis of the three biomarkers was performed on 19 patients with musculoskeletal infections with positive cultures and 21 controls to assess their diagnostic potential using the unpaired nonparametric t-test with the Mann-Whitney test. We obtained 8-week follow-up blood samples from seven patients with musculoskeletal infections who clinically healed. Healing was defined by normalization of inflammatory markers (WBC and CRP) and absence of swelling, erythema, local tenderness or pain, warmth, purulent drainage, sinus tract, or open wound. We performed a comparative analysis of the seven patients during active infection and after treatment to determine a change in the level of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 in their serum and PBMCs. These findings were also compared with those of the control group. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 for musculoskeletal infections using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The musculoskeletal infections group showed a larger increased serum and PBMC concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 proteins compared with the control group. The mean protein concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 were increased in the serum and PBMC of the musculoskeletal infections group compared with the controls. Serum levels of all biomarkers investigated were higher in musculoskeletal infections group compared with the control group (CD177 227 [155 to 432] versus 54 [10 to 100], difference of medians 173, p < 0.01; MYBL2 255 [231 to 314] versus 180 [148 to 214], difference of medians 75, p < 0.01; RRM2 250 [216 to 305] versus 190 [148 to 255], difference of medians 60, p < 0.01). Similarly, PBMC levels of all biomarkers were higher in the musculoskeletal infections group (CD177 55.3 [39.1 to 80.5] versus 17.5 [10.5 to 27.5], difference of medians 37.8, p < 0.01; MYBL2 144 [114 to 190] versus 91 [70 to 105], difference of medians 53, p < 0.01; RRM2 168 [143 to 202] versus 100 [77.5 to 133], difference of medians 68, p < 0.01). Additionally, serum levels of all biomarkers decreased in seven patients with musculoskeletal infections after infection treatment (CD177 3080 [2690 to 3320] versus 4250 [3100 to 8640], difference of medians 1170, p < 0.01; MYBL2 4340 [4120 to 4750] versus 5010 [4460 to 5880], difference of medians 670, p < 0.01; RRM2 4350 [3980 to 5000] versus 5025 [4430 to 6280], difference of medians 675, p = 0.01). Similarly, PBMC levels of all biomarkers were lower after infection treatment (CD177 805 [680 to 980] versus 1025 [750 to 1610], difference of medians 220, p < 0.01; MYBL2 2300 [2100 to 2550] versus 2680 [2220 to 3400], difference of medians 380, p = 0.02; RRM2 2720 [2500 to 3200] versus 3350 [2825 to 4030], difference of medians 630, p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve for diagnosing musculoskeletal infections in the serum and PBMC was as follows: CD177 95% confidence interval [CI] > 0.99 and > 0.99, MYBL2 95% CI > 0.99 and > 0.99, and RRM2 95% CI = 0.96 and > 0.99, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We may utilize blood-based tests for CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 to aid in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections, particularly when arthrocentesis or obtaining tissue culture is challenging. They may also assist in monitoring treatment response. As some of these biomarkers may also be elevated in other inflammatory conditions, a large-scale clinical study is needed to confirm their reliability in differentiating musculoskeletal infections from other inflammatory conditions.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 proteins in blood samples may serve as novel biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring treatment response in musculoskeletal infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1062-1071"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers of infection are measurable indicators that reflect the presence of an infection in the body. They are particularly valuable for detecting infections and tracking treatment responses. Previous transcriptome analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from patients during the active phase of diabetic foot infection identified the upregulation of several genes, including a neutrophil-specific cell surface glycoprotein, CD177, an Myb-related transcription factor 2 (MYBL2), and ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M2 (RRM2). We aimed to investigate whether these observations in diabetic foot infections could be extrapolated to other musculoskeletal infections.

Questions/purposes: (1) Are the protein concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 elevated in serum or PBMCs of patients with musculoskeletal infections? (2) Do serum and PBMC concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 decrease in response to antibiotic therapy? (3) Can these biomarkers give diagnostic accuracy and differentiate patients with musculoskeletal infections from controls?

Methods: From April 2023 to June 2024, we treated 26 patients presenting with clinical symptoms and signs of acute musculoskeletal infections, including elevated inflammatory markers (white blood cell [WBC] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) and local changes such as swelling, erythema, tenderness or pain, warmth, purulent drainage, sinus tract, or wound leading to bone or hardware. Diagnosis included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), foot and ankle infection (FAI), fracture-related infection (FRI), and septic arthritis of the native joints. Patients with chronic recurrent osteomyelitis, PJI, or FRI were excluded from the study. Among the 26 patients deemed potentially eligible, 19% (5) were excluded for the following reasons: prison inmate (1), unable to provide consent because of severe sepsis (1), mental illness (1), and declined to participate (2). Of the 81% (21) of patients who provided consent, cultures from 9.5% (2) were negative. These two patients were ultimately diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis: gout (1) and rheumatoid arthritis (1); thus, the musculoskeletal infection group for analysis consisted of 73.1% (19 of 26) of patients. A control group of 21 patients undergoing elective foot or ankle deformity correction surgery without infections or systemic inflammation was included. Because foot or ankle deformity is highly unlikely to influence the immunologic profile of the subjects, we believed that these patients would serve as an appropriate control group. Other than the absence of infection and the lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus, the control group was comparable to the study group in terms of demographics and clinical factors, including age and sex distribution. We collected blood samples from both patients and controls and quantified CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 RNA transcription levels in the PBMC using qRT-PCR. We also assessed protein concentrations in the serum and PBMC using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A comparative analysis of the three biomarkers was performed on 19 patients with musculoskeletal infections with positive cultures and 21 controls to assess their diagnostic potential using the unpaired nonparametric t-test with the Mann-Whitney test. We obtained 8-week follow-up blood samples from seven patients with musculoskeletal infections who clinically healed. Healing was defined by normalization of inflammatory markers (WBC and CRP) and absence of swelling, erythema, local tenderness or pain, warmth, purulent drainage, sinus tract, or open wound. We performed a comparative analysis of the seven patients during active infection and after treatment to determine a change in the level of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 in their serum and PBMCs. These findings were also compared with those of the control group. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 for musculoskeletal infections using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The musculoskeletal infections group showed a larger increased serum and PBMC concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 proteins compared with the control group. The mean protein concentrations of CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 were increased in the serum and PBMC of the musculoskeletal infections group compared with the controls. Serum levels of all biomarkers investigated were higher in musculoskeletal infections group compared with the control group (CD177 227 [155 to 432] versus 54 [10 to 100], difference of medians 173, p < 0.01; MYBL2 255 [231 to 314] versus 180 [148 to 214], difference of medians 75, p < 0.01; RRM2 250 [216 to 305] versus 190 [148 to 255], difference of medians 60, p < 0.01). Similarly, PBMC levels of all biomarkers were higher in the musculoskeletal infections group (CD177 55.3 [39.1 to 80.5] versus 17.5 [10.5 to 27.5], difference of medians 37.8, p < 0.01; MYBL2 144 [114 to 190] versus 91 [70 to 105], difference of medians 53, p < 0.01; RRM2 168 [143 to 202] versus 100 [77.5 to 133], difference of medians 68, p < 0.01). Additionally, serum levels of all biomarkers decreased in seven patients with musculoskeletal infections after infection treatment (CD177 3080 [2690 to 3320] versus 4250 [3100 to 8640], difference of medians 1170, p < 0.01; MYBL2 4340 [4120 to 4750] versus 5010 [4460 to 5880], difference of medians 670, p < 0.01; RRM2 4350 [3980 to 5000] versus 5025 [4430 to 6280], difference of medians 675, p = 0.01). Similarly, PBMC levels of all biomarkers were lower after infection treatment (CD177 805 [680 to 980] versus 1025 [750 to 1610], difference of medians 220, p < 0.01; MYBL2 2300 [2100 to 2550] versus 2680 [2220 to 3400], difference of medians 380, p = 0.02; RRM2 2720 [2500 to 3200] versus 3350 [2825 to 4030], difference of medians 630, p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve for diagnosing musculoskeletal infections in the serum and PBMC was as follows: CD177 95% confidence interval [CI] > 0.99 and > 0.99, MYBL2 95% CI > 0.99 and > 0.99, and RRM2 95% CI = 0.96 and > 0.99, respectively.

Conclusion: We may utilize blood-based tests for CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 to aid in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections, particularly when arthrocentesis or obtaining tissue culture is challenging. They may also assist in monitoring treatment response. As some of these biomarkers may also be elevated in other inflammatory conditions, a large-scale clinical study is needed to confirm their reliability in differentiating musculoskeletal infections from other inflammatory conditions.

Clinical relevance: CD177, MYBL2, and RRM2 proteins in blood samples may serve as novel biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring treatment response in musculoskeletal infections.

CD177、MYBL2和RRM2是肌肉骨骼感染的潜在生物标志物
背景:感染的生物标志物是反映体内感染存在的可测量指标。它们在检测感染和追踪治疗反应方面特别有价值。先前对糖尿病足感染活活跃期患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)的转录组分析发现,几个基因上调,包括中性粒细胞特异性细胞表面糖蛋白CD177、myb相关转录因子2 (MYBL2)和核糖核苷酸还原酶调节亚基M2 (RRM2)。我们的目的是研究糖尿病足感染的这些观察结果是否可以外推到其他肌肉骨骼感染。问题/目的:(1)肌肉骨骼感染患者血清或外周血中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2蛋白浓度是否升高?(2)血清和PBMC中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2浓度是否因抗生素治疗而降低?(3)这些生物标志物能否提供诊断准确性并将肌肉骨骼感染患者与对照组区分开来?方法:从2023年4月至2024年6月,我们治疗了26例出现急性肌肉骨骼感染临床症状和体征的患者,包括炎症标志物(白细胞[WBC]和c反应蛋白[CRP])升高和局部变化,如肿胀、红斑、压痛或疼痛、发热、化脓性引流、窦道或导致骨骼或硬件的伤口。诊断包括假体周围关节感染(PJI)、足部和踝关节感染(FAI)、骨折相关感染(FRI)和原生关节脓毒性关节炎。慢性复发性骨髓炎、PJI或FRI患者被排除在研究之外。在26名被认为可能符合条件的患者中,19%(5)因以下原因被排除在外:监狱囚犯(1),因严重败血症(1)而无法提供同意(1),精神疾病(1),以及拒绝参与(2)。在81%(21)提供同意的患者中,9.5%(2)的培养为阴性。这两名患者最终被诊断为炎性关节炎:痛风(1)和类风湿关节炎(1);因此,用于分析的肌肉骨骼感染组占73.1%(26例中的19例)。对照组21例患者接受选择性足部或踝关节畸形矫正手术,无感染或全身性炎症。由于足部或踝关节畸形极不可能影响受试者的免疫特征,我们认为这些患者可以作为合适的对照组。除了没有感染和糖尿病患病率较低外,对照组在人口统计学和临床因素(包括年龄和性别分布)方面与研究组相当。我们收集了患者和对照组的血液样本,并使用qRT-PCR量化了PBMC中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2 RNA的转录水平。我们还使用酶联免疫吸附法评估了血清和PBMC中的蛋白质浓度。对19例培养阳性的肌肉骨骼感染患者和21例对照患者进行了三种生物标志物的比较分析,以评估他们的诊断潜力,使用非配对非参数t检验和Mann-Whitney检验。我们获得了7例临床治愈的肌肉骨骼感染患者8周的随访血液样本。愈合的定义是炎症标志物(WBC和CRP)正常化,无肿胀、红斑、局部压痛或疼痛、发热、化脓性引流、窦道或开放性伤口。我们对7名患者在活动性感染期间和治疗后进行了比较分析,以确定其血清和外周血中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2水平的变化。这些发现也与对照组的结果进行了比较。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估了CD177、MYBL2和RRM2对肌肉骨骼感染的诊断准确性。结果:与对照组相比,肌肉骨骼感染组血清和PBMC中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2蛋白的浓度明显升高。与对照组相比,肌肉骨骼感染组血清和PBMC中CD177、MYBL2和RRM2的平均蛋白浓度升高。肌肉骨骼感染组血清中所有生物标志物水平均高于对照组(CD177 227[155 ~ 432]对54[10 ~ 100],中位数差异173,p < 0.01;MYBL2 255[231 ~ 314]比180[148 ~ 214],中位数差75,p < 0.01;RRM2 250 [216 ~ 305] vs . 190[148 ~ 255],中位数差60,p < 0.01)。同样,所有生物标志物的PBMC水平在肌肉骨骼感染组更高(CD177 55.3[39.1至80.5]对17.5[10.5至27.5],中位数差异为37.8,p < 0。 01;MYBL2 144[114 ~ 190]对91[70 ~ 105],中位数差异53,p < 0.01;RRM2 168[143 ~ 202]比100[77.5 ~ 133],中位数差68,p < 0.01)。此外,7例肌肉骨骼感染患者在接受感染治疗后,血清中所有生物标志物水平均下降(CD177 3080[2690 ~ 3320]比4250[3100 ~ 8640],中位数差异为1170,p < 0.01;MYBL2 4340 [4120 ~ 4750] vs 5010[4460 ~ 5880],中位数差670,p < 0.01;RRM2 4350 [3980 ~ 5000] vs 5025[4430 ~ 6280],中位数差675,p = 0.01)。同样,感染治疗后,所有生物标志物的PBMC水平均较低(CD177 805[680 ~ 980]比1025[750 ~ 1610],中位数差异为220,p < 0.01;MYBL2 2300 [2100 ~ 2550] vs 2680[2220 ~ 3400],中位数差380,p = 0.02;RRM2 2720 [2500 ~ 3200] vs 3350[2825 ~ 4030],中位数差630,p < 0.01)。诊断血清和PBMC中肌肉骨骼感染的ROC曲线下面积为:CD177 95%置信区间[CI] >.99和> 0.99,MYBL2 95% CI >.99和> 0.99,RRM2 95% CI = 0.96和> 0.99。结论:我们可以利用基于血液的CD177、MYBL2和RRM2检测来帮助诊断肌肉骨骼感染,特别是当关节穿刺或获得组织培养具有挑战性时。它们也有助于监测治疗反应。由于其中一些生物标志物在其他炎症条件下也可能升高,因此需要大规模的临床研究来证实它们在区分肌肉骨骼感染和其他炎症条件下的可靠性。临床意义:血液样本中的CD177、MYBL2和RRM2蛋白可作为诊断和监测肌肉骨骼感染治疗反应的新型生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信