Shinya Nakada, Joey Ward, Rona J Strawbridge, Paul Welsh, Carlos Celis-Morales, Frederick K Ho, Jill P Pell
{"title":"Anxiety disorder, depression and coronary artery disease: associations and modification by genetic susceptibility.","authors":"Shinya Nakada, Joey Ward, Rona J Strawbridge, Paul Welsh, Carlos Celis-Morales, Frederick K Ho, Jill P Pell","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03915-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with coronary artery disease (CAD) are heterogeneous between populations. This study investigated how genetic susceptibility to CAD alters these associations with incident CAD, comparing and combining anxiety disorder and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression were ascertained through linked hospital admission data. Incident CAD was ascertained through hospital admission and death certificate data after baseline. CAD polygenic risk score (PRS<sub>CAD</sub>) was obtained from CARDIoGRAMplus4 and categorised into low, intermediate, and high. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between anxiety disorder and depression and CAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both anxiety disorder (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.92-2.78) and depression (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.90-2.24) were associated with CAD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. There was an addictive interaction between depression and PRS<sub>CAD</sub> (RERI 0.97, 95% CI 0.12-1.81) such that the association between depression and CAD was strongest among those with a high PRS<sub>CAD</sub> whilst there was no such evidence for anxiety disorder. Anxiety disorder only (HR 1.68, 95% 1.16-2.44), depression only (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.72-2.64), and concomitant anxiety disorder and depression (HR 3.85, 95% CI 2.48-5.98) were associated with CAD even among people with a low PRS<sub>CAD</sub>. Adjusting for potential mediators attenuated all these associations across PRS categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAD genetic susceptibility might partly contribute to the clustering of depression and CAD but does not provide a full explanation, nor does it explain the association between anxiety disorder and CAD. Therefore, other mechanisms should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03915-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with coronary artery disease (CAD) are heterogeneous between populations. This study investigated how genetic susceptibility to CAD alters these associations with incident CAD, comparing and combining anxiety disorder and depression.
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression were ascertained through linked hospital admission data. Incident CAD was ascertained through hospital admission and death certificate data after baseline. CAD polygenic risk score (PRSCAD) was obtained from CARDIoGRAMplus4 and categorised into low, intermediate, and high. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between anxiety disorder and depression and CAD.
Results: Both anxiety disorder (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.92-2.78) and depression (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.90-2.24) were associated with CAD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. There was an addictive interaction between depression and PRSCAD (RERI 0.97, 95% CI 0.12-1.81) such that the association between depression and CAD was strongest among those with a high PRSCAD whilst there was no such evidence for anxiety disorder. Anxiety disorder only (HR 1.68, 95% 1.16-2.44), depression only (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.72-2.64), and concomitant anxiety disorder and depression (HR 3.85, 95% CI 2.48-5.98) were associated with CAD even among people with a low PRSCAD. Adjusting for potential mediators attenuated all these associations across PRS categories.
Conclusions: CAD genetic susceptibility might partly contribute to the clustering of depression and CAD but does not provide a full explanation, nor does it explain the association between anxiety disorder and CAD. Therefore, other mechanisms should be explored.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.