Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fangzhou Jin, Xiangmei Peng, Lanfang Sun, Zicong Song, Keyi Zhou, Chin-Hsi Lin
{"title":"Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community","authors":"Fangzhou Jin,&nbsp;Xiangmei Peng,&nbsp;Lanfang Sun,&nbsp;Zicong Song,&nbsp;Keyi Zhou,&nbsp;Chin-Hsi Lin","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are various challenges to teachers' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for professional learning. Although GenAI is expected to play a transformative role in teachers' learning, its impact on them remains subtle.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Guided by community of practice, this paper examines the integration of GenAI into an online professional learning community (OPLC) to facilitate knowledge co-construction among GenAI, novice teachers and experienced teachers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a mixed-methods approach that included topic modelling and sentiment analysis on the quantitative side and content analysis for the qualitative data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified the top three latent themes in the OPLC's discourse—(1) generating instructional material, (2) assessment, and (3) pedagogy—and six distinct teacher-GenAI interaction profiles. For novice teachers, these included ‘engaged AI explorers’, ‘selective satisfiers’ and ‘silent strategists’; and among experienced teachers, we discerned ‘careful critics’, ‘reflective realists’ and ‘cautious contemplators’. Novice teachers exhibited technological adaptivity, while experienced ones engaged reflectively with content and focused more on students, and GenAI proved effective at providing instructional materials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings demonstrate how GenAI can contribute to knowledge co-construction, as a facilitator of rather than a replacement for human interaction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are various challenges to teachers' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for professional learning. Although GenAI is expected to play a transformative role in teachers' learning, its impact on them remains subtle.

Objectives

Guided by community of practice, this paper examines the integration of GenAI into an online professional learning community (OPLC) to facilitate knowledge co-construction among GenAI, novice teachers and experienced teachers.

Methods

We used a mixed-methods approach that included topic modelling and sentiment analysis on the quantitative side and content analysis for the qualitative data.

Results

We identified the top three latent themes in the OPLC's discourse—(1) generating instructional material, (2) assessment, and (3) pedagogy—and six distinct teacher-GenAI interaction profiles. For novice teachers, these included ‘engaged AI explorers’, ‘selective satisfiers’ and ‘silent strategists’; and among experienced teachers, we discerned ‘careful critics’, ‘reflective realists’ and ‘cautious contemplators’. Novice teachers exhibited technological adaptivity, while experienced ones engaged reflectively with content and focused more on students, and GenAI proved effective at providing instructional materials.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate how GenAI can contribute to knowledge co-construction, as a facilitator of rather than a replacement for human interaction.

Abstract Image

在线专业学习社区中人工智能、新手教师和资深教师的知识(协同)构建
教师在专业学习中使用生成式人工智能(GenAI)面临着各种挑战。尽管GenAI有望在教师的学习中发挥变革性的作用,但它对教师的影响仍然很微妙。本文以实践社区为指导,探讨将GenAI整合到在线专业学习社区(OPLC)中,以促进GenAI与新手教师和经验丰富的教师之间的知识共建。方法采用混合方法,包括定量方面的主题建模和情感分析,以及定性数据的内容分析。我们确定了OPLC话语中的前三个潜在主题(1)生成教学材料,(2)评估和(3)教学法,以及六个不同的教师- genai互动概况。对于新手教师来说,这些包括“参与人工智能探索者”、“选择性满足者”和“沉默的战略家”;在经验丰富的教师中,我们发现了“谨慎的批评家”、“反思现实主义者”和“谨慎的沉思者”。新手教师表现出技术适应性,而经验丰富的教师则对内容进行反思,更多地关注学生,GenAI在提供教学材料方面被证明是有效的。研究结果表明,GenAI可以作为人类互动的促进者而不是替代品,为知识共建做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信