Winter hay-feeding effects on soil properties in a rotationally grazed pasture system in the Ozark Highlands

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Larry Berry, Kristofor R. Brye, Andrew Sharpley, Ron Morrow, Dirk Phillipp, Tim A. Glover, James M. Burke, Mike B. Daniels
{"title":"Winter hay-feeding effects on soil properties in a rotationally grazed pasture system in the Ozark Highlands","authors":"Larry Berry,&nbsp;Kristofor R. Brye,&nbsp;Andrew Sharpley,&nbsp;Ron Morrow,&nbsp;Dirk Phillipp,&nbsp;Tim A. Glover,&nbsp;James M. Burke,&nbsp;Mike B. Daniels","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil nutrient management for pastures in Arkansas often ignores nutrients applied from feeding hay to cattle. Discounting nutrient contributions from hay may increase the likelihood of unnecessary fertilizer over-application. This study evaluated the effects of unrolling bales (unroll fed, UF) and using a ring feeder (ring fed, RF), compared to an unamended control, on changes in soil properties in the top 4 inches in a rotationally grazed, beef [red angus (<i>Bos taurus</i>)] pasture on silt-loam soils in northwest Arkansas. Forty-six cow–calf pairs were fed hay at 6.6 tons acre<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> (14.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; dry-weight basis) from December to February during the 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 winters. Over the study period, extractable soil K and Mg concentrations increased (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) by 83% and 33% for RF and by 126% and 51% for UF treatments, respectively. Soil bulk density (BD) decreased (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.1) by 3.9% from 2015 to 2017 for the UF, while soil BD in the unamended control and RF treatments did not change over time. Mean overall infiltration was three times greater (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) for the UF (1.76 mm min<sup>−1</sup>) than RF (0.56 mm min<sup>−1</sup>) treatment, while overall infiltration rate into the unamended control (1.1 mm min<sup>−1</sup>) did not differ from the UF or RF treatments. Results demonstrated that hay-feeding strategies can impact soil BD and infiltration and that nutrients in winter-fed hay impart benefits to pasture soil fertility that should be accounted for in a soil fertility management scheme in a rotationally grazed, pasture system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil nutrient management for pastures in Arkansas often ignores nutrients applied from feeding hay to cattle. Discounting nutrient contributions from hay may increase the likelihood of unnecessary fertilizer over-application. This study evaluated the effects of unrolling bales (unroll fed, UF) and using a ring feeder (ring fed, RF), compared to an unamended control, on changes in soil properties in the top 4 inches in a rotationally grazed, beef [red angus (Bos taurus)] pasture on silt-loam soils in northwest Arkansas. Forty-six cow–calf pairs were fed hay at 6.6 tons acre−1 year−1 (14.8 Mg ha−1 year−1; dry-weight basis) from December to February during the 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 winters. Over the study period, extractable soil K and Mg concentrations increased (P < 0.05) by 83% and 33% for RF and by 126% and 51% for UF treatments, respectively. Soil bulk density (BD) decreased (P < 0.1) by 3.9% from 2015 to 2017 for the UF, while soil BD in the unamended control and RF treatments did not change over time. Mean overall infiltration was three times greater (P < 0.05) for the UF (1.76 mm min−1) than RF (0.56 mm min−1) treatment, while overall infiltration rate into the unamended control (1.1 mm min−1) did not differ from the UF or RF treatments. Results demonstrated that hay-feeding strategies can impact soil BD and infiltration and that nutrients in winter-fed hay impart benefits to pasture soil fertility that should be accounted for in a soil fertility management scheme in a rotationally grazed, pasture system.

Abstract Image

奥扎克高原轮牧系统冬季干草饲喂对土壤性质的影响
阿肯色州牧场的土壤养分管理经常忽略喂干草给牛施用的养分。低估干草的营养贡献可能会增加不必要的化肥过度施用的可能性。本研究评估了在阿肯色州西北部粉壤土上轮牧牛肉[红安格斯(Bos taurus)]牧场,展开捆(unroll feeding, UF)和使用环形喂料器(ring feeding, RF)对顶部4英寸土壤特性变化的影响,并与未进行改良的对照进行了比较。以6.6吨英亩- 1年- 1(14.8毫克公顷- 1年- 1;在2015-2016年和2016-2017年冬季,从12月到2月。在研究期间,可提取土壤K和Mg浓度增加(P <;0.05), RF处理分别提高了83%和33%,UF处理分别提高了126%和51%。土壤容重(BD)减小(P <;从2015年到2017年,UF处理的土壤BD增加了3.9%,而未经改良的对照和RF处理的土壤BD没有随时间变化。平均总体入渗量是前者的3倍(P <;超滤菌(1.76 mm min - 1)的总体入渗率(1.1 mm min - 1)与超滤菌和射频菌(0.56 mm min - 1)处理相比无显著差异。结果表明,干草饲喂策略会影响土壤BD和入渗,冬饲干草中的养分对草地土壤肥力有好处,这应该在轮牧牧草系统的土壤肥力管理方案中得到考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信