Self-reported knowledge and attitudes surrounding care of LGBTQIA+ patients in the emergency department

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Katherine Pavlovic BNurs, MNursPrac, BHealthSc, Emily Thrower BSc (Hons), MD, SCHP, DRANZCOG, Jakob Malouf MBBS (Hons), EMC (ACEM), Joe Anthony Rotella MBBS, BSc, MMedTox, FACEM
{"title":"Self-reported knowledge and attitudes surrounding care of LGBTQIA+ patients in the emergency department","authors":"Katherine Pavlovic BNurs, MNursPrac, BHealthSc,&nbsp;Emily Thrower BSc (Hons), MD, SCHP, DRANZCOG,&nbsp;Jakob Malouf MBBS (Hons), EMC (ACEM),&nbsp;Joe Anthony Rotella MBBS, BSc, MMedTox, FACEM","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The ED is a common pathway for receiving care for all consumers. Little is known about staff perspectives about care of consumers who identify as LGBTQIA+ in an Australian setting. We sort to explore staff knowledge, attitude and behaviours around care of LGBTQIA+ consumers to identify potential barriers to care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An anonymised electronic survey of staff from a community hospital ED was conducted. Medical, nursing, allied health and clerical staff were all invited to participate. The survey contained 33 questions in the form of multiple-choice questions and free-text commentary. Responses were pooled and analysed both as a whole and by role within the ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred nine participants responded (response rate 25.3%). Over 50% of respondents were aged 44 years or less (74.4%), and predominantly identified as female (63.3%) and heterosexual (80.7%). Most respondents did not find treating or interacting with LGBTQIA+ consumers challenging, difficult, or uncomfortable irrespective of role. Most disagreed it was more difficult to undertake a clinical assessment compared to other consumers. Consumer-led education from people identifying as LGBTQIA+ was preferred for improving care (26.6%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study found that despite little or no formal training in provision of care for LGBTQIA+ consumers, respondents saw LGBTQIA+ consumers as a relatively small group within the wider ED consumer population and did not see the treatment of LGBTQIA+ consumers as more challenging with respect to interaction, assessment and provision of care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The ED is a common pathway for receiving care for all consumers. Little is known about staff perspectives about care of consumers who identify as LGBTQIA+ in an Australian setting. We sort to explore staff knowledge, attitude and behaviours around care of LGBTQIA+ consumers to identify potential barriers to care.

Methods

An anonymised electronic survey of staff from a community hospital ED was conducted. Medical, nursing, allied health and clerical staff were all invited to participate. The survey contained 33 questions in the form of multiple-choice questions and free-text commentary. Responses were pooled and analysed both as a whole and by role within the ED.

Results

One hundred nine participants responded (response rate 25.3%). Over 50% of respondents were aged 44 years or less (74.4%), and predominantly identified as female (63.3%) and heterosexual (80.7%). Most respondents did not find treating or interacting with LGBTQIA+ consumers challenging, difficult, or uncomfortable irrespective of role. Most disagreed it was more difficult to undertake a clinical assessment compared to other consumers. Consumer-led education from people identifying as LGBTQIA+ was preferred for improving care (26.6%).

Conclusions

This study found that despite little or no formal training in provision of care for LGBTQIA+ consumers, respondents saw LGBTQIA+ consumers as a relatively small group within the wider ED consumer population and did not see the treatment of LGBTQIA+ consumers as more challenging with respect to interaction, assessment and provision of care.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信