{"title":"In silico pentapeptide design for the inhibition between S100 calcium-binding A9 (S100A9) proteins","authors":"Jintao Pan, Chong Lee Ng, Theam Soon Lim, Yee Siew Choong","doi":"10.1007/s00894-025-06298-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) is easily assembled into amyloid aggregates in solution. These amyloid aggregates cause retinal toxicity and act as an attachment core for Aβ fibrillar plaques that contribute to Alzheimer’s disease progression. The overexpression of S100A9 is also noticed in various malignancies. Therefore, the S100A9 amyloid formation inhibition is of significant interest. In comparison with small-molecule drugs, short peptides demonstrate higher specificity, potency, and biosafety. Hence, it could be beneficial to identify potential peptides to inhibit or disrupt S100A9 amyloid aggregation. Typical peptide design and identification via experimental means requires extensive preparation procedures and is limited to random selection of peptides. Virtual screening therefore offers an unbiased, higher throughput, and economically efficient approach in peptide drug development. Here, we reported <i>in silico</i> pentapeptide design against S100A9 and studied the interaction of pentapeptide with S100A9 that leads to the binding of the peptide with S100A9.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>Docking simulation resulted in three top binding free energy tripeptides (WWF, WPW, and YWF) with comparable affinity towards a known S100A9 inhibitor (polyphenol oleuropein aglycone; OleA). Subsequently, pentapeptides that consist of the three core tripeptides were selected from a pre-constructed pentapeptide library for further evaluation with docking simulation. Based on best docked binding free energy, two pentapeptides (WWPWH and WPWYW) were selected and subjected to 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study the important features that lead to the binding with S100A9. MMGBSA binding free energy calculation estimated − 30.38, − 24.58, and − 30.31 kcal/mol for WWPWH, WPWYW, and OleA, respectively. The main driving force for pentapeptide-S100A9 recognition was contributed by the electrostatic interaction. The results demonstrate that at <i>in silico</i> level, this workflow is able to design potential pentapeptides that are comparable with OleA and might be the lead molecule for future use to disaggregate S100A9 fibrils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-025-06298-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) is easily assembled into amyloid aggregates in solution. These amyloid aggregates cause retinal toxicity and act as an attachment core for Aβ fibrillar plaques that contribute to Alzheimer’s disease progression. The overexpression of S100A9 is also noticed in various malignancies. Therefore, the S100A9 amyloid formation inhibition is of significant interest. In comparison with small-molecule drugs, short peptides demonstrate higher specificity, potency, and biosafety. Hence, it could be beneficial to identify potential peptides to inhibit or disrupt S100A9 amyloid aggregation. Typical peptide design and identification via experimental means requires extensive preparation procedures and is limited to random selection of peptides. Virtual screening therefore offers an unbiased, higher throughput, and economically efficient approach in peptide drug development. Here, we reported in silico pentapeptide design against S100A9 and studied the interaction of pentapeptide with S100A9 that leads to the binding of the peptide with S100A9.
Method
Docking simulation resulted in three top binding free energy tripeptides (WWF, WPW, and YWF) with comparable affinity towards a known S100A9 inhibitor (polyphenol oleuropein aglycone; OleA). Subsequently, pentapeptides that consist of the three core tripeptides were selected from a pre-constructed pentapeptide library for further evaluation with docking simulation. Based on best docked binding free energy, two pentapeptides (WWPWH and WPWYW) were selected and subjected to 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study the important features that lead to the binding with S100A9. MMGBSA binding free energy calculation estimated − 30.38, − 24.58, and − 30.31 kcal/mol for WWPWH, WPWYW, and OleA, respectively. The main driving force for pentapeptide-S100A9 recognition was contributed by the electrostatic interaction. The results demonstrate that at in silico level, this workflow is able to design potential pentapeptides that are comparable with OleA and might be the lead molecule for future use to disaggregate S100A9 fibrils.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling.
Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry.
Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.