Safety-Critical Oracles for Metamorphic Testing of Deep Learning LiDAR Point Cloud Object Detectors

IF 4.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Simon Speth;Maximilian Trien;Dominik Kufer;Alexander Pretschner
{"title":"Safety-Critical Oracles for Metamorphic Testing of Deep Learning LiDAR Point Cloud Object Detectors","authors":"Simon Speth;Maximilian Trien;Dominik Kufer;Alexander Pretschner","doi":"10.1109/OJITS.2025.3532777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robustness testing is crucial for verifying autonomous vehicles, especially for safety-critical deep learning components like light detection and ranging (LiDAR) object detectors. Metamorphic testing (MT) assesses the robustness by automatically generating test cases based on abstract system specifications known as metamorphic relations (MRs). However, a key challenge is ensuring a traceable safety argumentation for MRs that is in line with industry standards. To ensure this traceability, we derive seven traceable metamorphic transformations from defects identified through interviews with industry experts. Another challenge is prioritizing failures by safety criticality, as not all failing test cases, as evaluated by current intersection over union (IoU)-based metamorphic oracles, pose the same safety risk. We address this by introducing novel egocentric test oracles based on traffic participants’ bounding boxes shifted into or out of the ego vehicle’s expected lane. Testing five LiDAR object detection systems working on two datasets by executing half a million metamorphic test cases (MTCs) shows that the number of failures decreases from 48k using IoU metrics to 342 safety-critical failures with our novel test oracle “shift out of ego lane.” This reduction enables testers to stay within the test analysis budget and, hence, manually analyze each failed MTC by prioritizing safety-critical test failures.","PeriodicalId":100631,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"6 ","pages":"95-108"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10849578","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10849578/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robustness testing is crucial for verifying autonomous vehicles, especially for safety-critical deep learning components like light detection and ranging (LiDAR) object detectors. Metamorphic testing (MT) assesses the robustness by automatically generating test cases based on abstract system specifications known as metamorphic relations (MRs). However, a key challenge is ensuring a traceable safety argumentation for MRs that is in line with industry standards. To ensure this traceability, we derive seven traceable metamorphic transformations from defects identified through interviews with industry experts. Another challenge is prioritizing failures by safety criticality, as not all failing test cases, as evaluated by current intersection over union (IoU)-based metamorphic oracles, pose the same safety risk. We address this by introducing novel egocentric test oracles based on traffic participants’ bounding boxes shifted into or out of the ego vehicle’s expected lane. Testing five LiDAR object detection systems working on two datasets by executing half a million metamorphic test cases (MTCs) shows that the number of failures decreases from 48k using IoU metrics to 342 safety-critical failures with our novel test oracle “shift out of ego lane.” This reduction enables testers to stay within the test analysis budget and, hence, manually analyze each failed MTC by prioritizing safety-critical test failures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信