Xiao Wang;Hanchuan Xu;Jian Yang;Xiaofei Xu;Zhongjie Wang
{"title":"A Collaborative Service Composition Approach Considering Providers’ Self-Interest and Minimal Service Sharing","authors":"Xiao Wang;Hanchuan Xu;Jian Yang;Xiaofei Xu;Zhongjie Wang","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2025.3534283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service composition dynamically integrates various services from multiple providers to meet complex user requirements. However, most existing methods assume centralized control over all services, which is often unrealistic because providers typically prefer to independently manage their own services, posing challenges to the application of traditional methods. Collaborative service composition offers a solution by enabling providers to work together to complete service composition. However, this approach also faces its own challenges. Driven by self-interest, providers may be reluctant to offer services needed by others, and due to business competition, they may wish to share as few services as possible (where sharing services means disclosing service information to other providers). To address these challenges, we propose a novel collaborative service composition approach that comprehensively considers each provider’s self-interest and achieves service composition with minimal service sharing. First, we introduce a “self-interest degree” model to capture providers’ self-interest. This behavior may lead to service refusal, so we design a service availability prediction method based on a reputation model to minimize rejections. Then, we propose a decentralized service composition method. It utilizes historical composition records to mine empirical rules between requirements and services, constructing a correlations matrix, and collaboratively trains a multi-label classification model with other providers under a distributed federated learning framework. Combining the matrix and model outputs, we design a service composition method and a node coordination protocol that completes service composition with minimal service sharing. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in capturing providers’ self-interest and showcase its superior performance compared to existing methods.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"36 3","pages":"598-615"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10854799/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Service composition dynamically integrates various services from multiple providers to meet complex user requirements. However, most existing methods assume centralized control over all services, which is often unrealistic because providers typically prefer to independently manage their own services, posing challenges to the application of traditional methods. Collaborative service composition offers a solution by enabling providers to work together to complete service composition. However, this approach also faces its own challenges. Driven by self-interest, providers may be reluctant to offer services needed by others, and due to business competition, they may wish to share as few services as possible (where sharing services means disclosing service information to other providers). To address these challenges, we propose a novel collaborative service composition approach that comprehensively considers each provider’s self-interest and achieves service composition with minimal service sharing. First, we introduce a “self-interest degree” model to capture providers’ self-interest. This behavior may lead to service refusal, so we design a service availability prediction method based on a reputation model to minimize rejections. Then, we propose a decentralized service composition method. It utilizes historical composition records to mine empirical rules between requirements and services, constructing a correlations matrix, and collaboratively trains a multi-label classification model with other providers under a distributed federated learning framework. Combining the matrix and model outputs, we design a service composition method and a node coordination protocol that completes service composition with minimal service sharing. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in capturing providers’ self-interest and showcase its superior performance compared to existing methods.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.