Andreas M. Klein , Jessica Kollmorgen , Andreas Hinderks , Martin Schrepp , Maria Rauschenberger , Maria-Jose Escalona
{"title":"Validation of the UEQ+ Scales for Voice Quality","authors":"Andreas M. Klein , Jessica Kollmorgen , Andreas Hinderks , Martin Schrepp , Maria Rauschenberger , Maria-Jose Escalona","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>User experience (UX) measurement is vital for evaluating interactive devices and systems such as voice user interfaces (VUIs), which are widely available in smart speakers and mobile phones (e.g., Alexa and Siri). The User Experience Questionnaire Plus (UEQ+) framework provides a flexible approach with three novel constructed voice scales that assess the UX quality of VUIs. The UEQ+ contains UX scales that measure distinct UX aspects such as <em>Efficiency</em>, <em>Stimulation</em> as well as the three voice scales <em>Response Behavior</em>, <em>Response Quality</em>, and <em>Comprehensibility</em>. These scales can be combined to easily create a product-related questionnaire for VUI assessment. In this paper, we focus on validating the UEQ+ voice scales by verifying their <em>reliability</em> and <em>validity</em>, which are fundamental UX scale quality criteria. We surveyed a total of 623 participants, asking about three popular VUIs in two growing consumer markets. Our validation study findings confirm the <em>reliability</em> and <em>factorial validity</em> of the three UEQ+ scales for voice quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 103971"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924001405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
User experience (UX) measurement is vital for evaluating interactive devices and systems such as voice user interfaces (VUIs), which are widely available in smart speakers and mobile phones (e.g., Alexa and Siri). The User Experience Questionnaire Plus (UEQ+) framework provides a flexible approach with three novel constructed voice scales that assess the UX quality of VUIs. The UEQ+ contains UX scales that measure distinct UX aspects such as Efficiency, Stimulation as well as the three voice scales Response Behavior, Response Quality, and Comprehensibility. These scales can be combined to easily create a product-related questionnaire for VUI assessment. In this paper, we focus on validating the UEQ+ voice scales by verifying their reliability and validity, which are fundamental UX scale quality criteria. We surveyed a total of 623 participants, asking about three popular VUIs in two growing consumer markets. Our validation study findings confirm the reliability and factorial validity of the three UEQ+ scales for voice quality.
期刊介绍:
The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking.
Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics.
The journal
• Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels
• Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities
• Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods
• Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts
• Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.