Analytical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Nathan L. Haas MD , Lynn Ang MD , Nazanene H. Esfandiari MD , Ahsan M. Khan MBBS , James A. Cranford PhD , Ashley Cohen MD , Jordan Sell MD , Mostafa Abdel-Hamid MD , Kevin E. Romanchik BSN, RN , Frederick K. Korley MD, PhD
{"title":"Analytical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis","authors":"Nathan L. Haas MD ,&nbsp;Lynn Ang MD ,&nbsp;Nazanene H. Esfandiari MD ,&nbsp;Ahsan M. Khan MBBS ,&nbsp;James A. Cranford PhD ,&nbsp;Ashley Cohen MD ,&nbsp;Jordan Sell MD ,&nbsp;Mostafa Abdel-Hamid MD ,&nbsp;Kevin E. Romanchik BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Frederick K. Korley MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) requires frequent point-of-care blood glucose (POCBG) measurements, often necessitating ICU admission and incurring substantial costs. Replacing hourly POCBG measurements with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could optimize DKA management by minimizing resource use and detecting hypoglycemic events earlier. However, the accuracy of CGM in DKA is not well established.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What is the clinical and analytical accuracy of CGM in adults with DKA?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective observational study at a single academic medical center emergency department. Adults older than 18 years with DKA were included. Glucose was measured every 5 minutes via Dexcom G6 CGM and compared with hourly POCBG measurements until resolution of DKA. The primary outcome was proportion of paired CGM and POCBG values in Clarke error grid zones A and B. Additional outcomes included level of agreement via Bland-Altman plot, mean absolute relative difference, and time of first detection of glucose &lt; 150 mg/dL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty adult patients with DKA were studied. Mean age was 42 years, 60% were female, 70% had type I diabetes, and mean presenting pH was 7.17. Three hundred thirty-four paired measurements from CGM and POCBG measurements were analyzed. Clarke error grid analysis revealed 97.0% of readings to be within zones A and B. Bland-Altman analysis showed the average difference between CGM and POCBG measurement was 26.0 mg/dL (95% limits of agreement, –70.7 to 122.6). Mean absolute relative difference was 28.6% (95% CI, 26.5%-30.6%). The first incidence of glucose &lt; 150 mg/dL (n = 14) was detected 28.9 minutes earlier by CGM than POCBG measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this study, CGM provided accurate measurements of blood glucose and identified missed opportunities for earlier intervention in adults with DKA. Future interventional trials can assess the impact of CGM-guided DKA management on patient outcomes, patient experience, and resource use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) requires frequent point-of-care blood glucose (POCBG) measurements, often necessitating ICU admission and incurring substantial costs. Replacing hourly POCBG measurements with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could optimize DKA management by minimizing resource use and detecting hypoglycemic events earlier. However, the accuracy of CGM in DKA is not well established.

Research Question

What is the clinical and analytical accuracy of CGM in adults with DKA?

Study Design and Methods

This was a prospective observational study at a single academic medical center emergency department. Adults older than 18 years with DKA were included. Glucose was measured every 5 minutes via Dexcom G6 CGM and compared with hourly POCBG measurements until resolution of DKA. The primary outcome was proportion of paired CGM and POCBG values in Clarke error grid zones A and B. Additional outcomes included level of agreement via Bland-Altman plot, mean absolute relative difference, and time of first detection of glucose < 150 mg/dL.

Results

Twenty adult patients with DKA were studied. Mean age was 42 years, 60% were female, 70% had type I diabetes, and mean presenting pH was 7.17. Three hundred thirty-four paired measurements from CGM and POCBG measurements were analyzed. Clarke error grid analysis revealed 97.0% of readings to be within zones A and B. Bland-Altman analysis showed the average difference between CGM and POCBG measurement was 26.0 mg/dL (95% limits of agreement, –70.7 to 122.6). Mean absolute relative difference was 28.6% (95% CI, 26.5%-30.6%). The first incidence of glucose < 150 mg/dL (n = 14) was detected 28.9 minutes earlier by CGM than POCBG measurements.

Interpretation

In this study, CGM provided accurate measurements of blood glucose and identified missed opportunities for earlier intervention in adults with DKA. Future interventional trials can assess the impact of CGM-guided DKA management on patient outcomes, patient experience, and resource use.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信