Quantification of tissue stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography and finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulation-based spatiotemporal neural network

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jiaying Zhang , Xin Mu , Xi Lin , Xiangwei Kong , Yanbin Li , Lianjun Du , Xueqin Xu , Jeff L. Zhang
{"title":"Quantification of tissue stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography and finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulation-based spatiotemporal neural network","authors":"Jiaying Zhang ,&nbsp;Xin Mu ,&nbsp;Xi Lin ,&nbsp;Xiangwei Kong ,&nbsp;Yanbin Li ,&nbsp;Lianjun Du ,&nbsp;Xueqin Xu ,&nbsp;Jeff L. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantification of tissue stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an inverse problem that is sensitive to noise. Conventional methods for the purpose include direct inversion (DI) and local frequency estimation (LFE). In this study, we propose to train a spatiotemporal neural network using MRE data simulated by the Finite Difference Time Domain method (FDTDNet), and to use the trained network to estimate tissue stiffness from MRE data. The proposed method showed significantly better robustness to noise than DI or LFE. For simulated data with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 15 dB, tissue stiffness by FDTDNet had mean absolute error of 0.41 kPa or 7 %, 77.8 % and 84.4 % lower than those by DI and LFE respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). For a homogeneous phantom with driver power decreasing from 30 % to 5 %, FDTDNet, DI and LFE provided stiffness estimates with deviation of 6.9 % (0.21 kPa), 9.2 % (0.28 kPa) and 45.8 % (1.20 kPa) of the respective stiffness level at driver power of 30 %. Detectability of small inclusions in estimated stiffness maps is also critical. For simulated data with inclusions of radius of 0.31 cm, FDTDNet achieved contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 4.20, 6900 % and 347 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), and structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.61, 27 % and 177 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). For phantom with inclusion of radius 0.39 cm, CNR of FDTDNet was 2.98, 90 % and 80 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and SSIM was 0.80, 89 % and 28 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). We also demonstrated the feasibility of FDTDNet in MRE data acquired from calf muscles of human subjects. In conclusion, by using a spatiotemporal neural network trained with simulated data, FDTDNet estimated tissue stiffness from MRE with superior noise robustness and detectability of focal inclusions, therefore showed potential in precisely quantifying MRE of human subjects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 110353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25000359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantification of tissue stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an inverse problem that is sensitive to noise. Conventional methods for the purpose include direct inversion (DI) and local frequency estimation (LFE). In this study, we propose to train a spatiotemporal neural network using MRE data simulated by the Finite Difference Time Domain method (FDTDNet), and to use the trained network to estimate tissue stiffness from MRE data. The proposed method showed significantly better robustness to noise than DI or LFE. For simulated data with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 15 dB, tissue stiffness by FDTDNet had mean absolute error of 0.41 kPa or 7 %, 77.8 % and 84.4 % lower than those by DI and LFE respectively (P < 0.0001). For a homogeneous phantom with driver power decreasing from 30 % to 5 %, FDTDNet, DI and LFE provided stiffness estimates with deviation of 6.9 % (0.21 kPa), 9.2 % (0.28 kPa) and 45.8 % (1.20 kPa) of the respective stiffness level at driver power of 30 %. Detectability of small inclusions in estimated stiffness maps is also critical. For simulated data with inclusions of radius of 0.31 cm, FDTDNet achieved contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 4.20, 6900 % and 347 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (P < 0.0001), and structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.61, 27 % and 177 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (P < 0.0001). For phantom with inclusion of radius 0.39 cm, CNR of FDTDNet was 2.98, 90 % and 80 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (P < 0.0001) and SSIM was 0.80, 89 % and 28 % higher than DI and LFE respectively (P < 0.0001). We also demonstrated the feasibility of FDTDNet in MRE data acquired from calf muscles of human subjects. In conclusion, by using a spatiotemporal neural network trained with simulated data, FDTDNet estimated tissue stiffness from MRE with superior noise robustness and detectability of focal inclusions, therefore showed potential in precisely quantifying MRE of human subjects.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信