Species classification of Tabanus (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Western Thailand: Integrating DNA barcoding and modern morphometrics

IF 1.7 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Tanasak Changbunjong , Thekhawet Weluwanarak , Sedthapong Laojun , Tanawat Chaiphongpachara
{"title":"Species classification of Tabanus (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Western Thailand: Integrating DNA barcoding and modern morphometrics","authors":"Tanasak Changbunjong ,&nbsp;Thekhawet Weluwanarak ,&nbsp;Sedthapong Laojun ,&nbsp;Tanawat Chaiphongpachara","doi":"10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The species of <em>Tabanus</em>, commonly known as horse flies, are remarkable ectoparasites capable of transmitting various pathogens to animals and humans. Given their role in disease transmission, accurate identification of horse fly species is critical but traditionally relies on morphological characteristics, requiring significant expertise and posing a high potential for error, especially with damaged specimens. To address the limitations of traditional morphological identification, this study highlights the importance of alternative techniques, including DNA barcoding and geometric morphometrics (GM). To enhance the reliability of species identification, DNA barcoding was employed to analyze 30 cytochrome <em>c</em> oxidase subunit 1 (<em>cox</em>1) gene sequences from 15 horse fly species, which were then compared with sequences in the GenBank and BOLD databases. Most <em>cox</em>1 sequences aligned with existing data, with similarity percentages ranging from 96% to 100%. However, discrepancies were noted, including <em>Tabanus helvinus</em>, misidentified as <em>Tabanus aurilineatus</em>, and <em>Tabanus minimus</em>, whose sequences matched those of both <em>Tabanus minimus</em> and <em>Tabanus mesogaeus</em>. Besides DNA barcoding, GM analyses were conducted to enhance species classification accuracy. Our GM analyses employed the landmark-based method for the entire wing and the outline-based method for the first submarginal cell. While shape-based GM analyses demonstrated high reliability, with adjusted total accuracy scores of 97% and 96%, size-based GM analyses yielded significantly lower accuracy, with scores of only 27% and 23%, respectively. These findings provide a foundation for refining horse fly species classification by integrating DNA barcoding and GM approaches, offering valuable advances in species identification and developing targeted control measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94311,"journal":{"name":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667114X25000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The species of Tabanus, commonly known as horse flies, are remarkable ectoparasites capable of transmitting various pathogens to animals and humans. Given their role in disease transmission, accurate identification of horse fly species is critical but traditionally relies on morphological characteristics, requiring significant expertise and posing a high potential for error, especially with damaged specimens. To address the limitations of traditional morphological identification, this study highlights the importance of alternative techniques, including DNA barcoding and geometric morphometrics (GM). To enhance the reliability of species identification, DNA barcoding was employed to analyze 30 cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene sequences from 15 horse fly species, which were then compared with sequences in the GenBank and BOLD databases. Most cox1 sequences aligned with existing data, with similarity percentages ranging from 96% to 100%. However, discrepancies were noted, including Tabanus helvinus, misidentified as Tabanus aurilineatus, and Tabanus minimus, whose sequences matched those of both Tabanus minimus and Tabanus mesogaeus. Besides DNA barcoding, GM analyses were conducted to enhance species classification accuracy. Our GM analyses employed the landmark-based method for the entire wing and the outline-based method for the first submarginal cell. While shape-based GM analyses demonstrated high reliability, with adjusted total accuracy scores of 97% and 96%, size-based GM analyses yielded significantly lower accuracy, with scores of only 27% and 23%, respectively. These findings provide a foundation for refining horse fly species classification by integrating DNA barcoding and GM approaches, offering valuable advances in species identification and developing targeted control measures.

Abstract Image

泰国西部虻属(双翅目:虻科)的种类分类:DNA条形码与现代形态计量学的整合
Tabanus,俗称马蝇,是一种显著的体外寄生虫,能够将各种病原体传播给动物和人类。鉴于它们在疾病传播中的作用,准确鉴定蝇类至关重要,但传统上依赖于形态学特征,需要大量专业知识,并且存在很大的错误可能性,特别是对于受损的标本。为了解决传统形态鉴定的局限性,本研究强调了替代技术的重要性,包括DNA条形码和几何形态计量学(GM)。为了提高物种鉴定的可靠性,采用DNA条形码技术对15种蝇类的30个细胞色素c氧化酶亚基1 (cox1)基因序列进行了分析,并与GenBank和BOLD数据库中的序列进行了比较。大多数cox1序列与现有数据一致,相似率在96%到100%之间。然而,也发现了一些差异,包括被误认为耳Tabanus aurilineatus的helvinus Tabanus,以及与Tabanus minimus和Tabanus mesogaeus序列一致的Tabanus minimus。除了DNA条形码外,还进行了转基因分析,以提高物种分类的准确性。我们的GM分析对整个机翼采用了基于地标的方法,对第一个亚边缘单元采用了基于轮廓的方法。虽然基于形状的GM分析显示出高可靠性,调整后的总准确率得分为97%和96%,但基于尺寸的GM分析的准确率明显较低,分别只有27%和23%。这些发现为整合DNA条形码和转基因技术来完善马蝇种类分类奠定了基础,为物种鉴定和制定有针对性的控制措施提供了有价值的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信