Exploring the resource nexus between forest-based land restoration and food security: The case of the African great green wall initiative countries

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ramoudane Orou Sannou , Edeltraud Guenther
{"title":"Exploring the resource nexus between forest-based land restoration and food security: The case of the African great green wall initiative countries","authors":"Ramoudane Orou Sannou ,&nbsp;Edeltraud Guenther","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land restoration is often considered crucial for improving food security, although the complex causal relationship between the two remains unclear. Forests established through land restoration efforts can contribute positively by providing direct food sources or enhancing ecosystem services, yet afforestation efforts may have unintended negative impacts, such as reducing soil moisture and lowering water tables, which could potentially exacerbate food insecurity. This paper contributes to the literature by exploring the complex association between a large-scale forest-based land restoration project and food security in the African Great Green Wall (GGW) countries. We utilized FAO survey data on food insecurity from 2015 to 2019, along with near-real-time Land Use Land Cover classification (LULC) generated by deep learning on Sentinel 2 images. Our findings indicate that GGW countries have lower food insecurity compared to non-GGW countries over the considered years. An increase in forest cover, used as a proxy indicator of land restoration, is positively correlated with a reduction in food insecurity. We also find that food insecurity varies across GGW countries, depending on their overall country fragility level. By factoring in country fragility and social sustainability indicators, this study provides a nuanced perspective on how context-specific factors in GGW countries—such as land tenure policies and governance structures—shape food security outcomes. This study highlights the importance of aligning land restoration efforts with social goals, including food security, tenure security, human development, peace, and effective governance. Such an integrated approach can maximize the achievement of multiple social and environmental benefits, ensuring more sustainable and impactful outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107499"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land restoration is often considered crucial for improving food security, although the complex causal relationship between the two remains unclear. Forests established through land restoration efforts can contribute positively by providing direct food sources or enhancing ecosystem services, yet afforestation efforts may have unintended negative impacts, such as reducing soil moisture and lowering water tables, which could potentially exacerbate food insecurity. This paper contributes to the literature by exploring the complex association between a large-scale forest-based land restoration project and food security in the African Great Green Wall (GGW) countries. We utilized FAO survey data on food insecurity from 2015 to 2019, along with near-real-time Land Use Land Cover classification (LULC) generated by deep learning on Sentinel 2 images. Our findings indicate that GGW countries have lower food insecurity compared to non-GGW countries over the considered years. An increase in forest cover, used as a proxy indicator of land restoration, is positively correlated with a reduction in food insecurity. We also find that food insecurity varies across GGW countries, depending on their overall country fragility level. By factoring in country fragility and social sustainability indicators, this study provides a nuanced perspective on how context-specific factors in GGW countries—such as land tenure policies and governance structures—shape food security outcomes. This study highlights the importance of aligning land restoration efforts with social goals, including food security, tenure security, human development, peace, and effective governance. Such an integrated approach can maximize the achievement of multiple social and environmental benefits, ensuring more sustainable and impactful outcomes.
以森林为基础的土地恢复与粮食安全之间的资源关系探讨:以非洲绿色长城倡议国家为例
土地恢复通常被认为对改善粮食安全至关重要,尽管两者之间复杂的因果关系尚不清楚。通过土地恢复工作建立的森林可以通过提供直接粮食来源或加强生态系统服务作出积极贡献,但造林工作可能产生意想不到的负面影响,例如降低土壤湿度和降低地下水位,这可能会加剧粮食不安全。本文通过探讨非洲绿色长城(GGW)国家大规模森林土地恢复项目与粮食安全之间的复杂关系,为文献做出贡献。我们利用了粮农组织2015年至2019年关于粮食不安全的调查数据,以及通过对Sentinel 2图像进行深度学习生成的近实时土地利用和土地覆盖分类(LULC)。我们的研究结果表明,在考虑的年份里,与非GGW国家相比,GGW国家的粮食不安全状况较低。作为土地恢复的替代指标,森林覆盖的增加与粮食不安全的减少呈正相关。我们还发现,粮食不安全状况在GGW各国之间存在差异,这取决于各国的总体脆弱性水平。通过将国家脆弱性和社会可持续性指标考虑在内,本研究提供了一个细致入微的视角,以了解GGW国家的具体环境因素(如土地保有政策和治理结构)如何影响粮食安全成果。本研究强调了将土地恢复工作与社会目标(包括粮食安全、权属保障、人类发展、和平和有效治理)结合起来的重要性。这种综合方法可以最大限度地实现多种社会和环境效益,确保更可持续和更有影响力的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信