Influence of variance reduction techniques on conventional radiotherapy simulations with TOPAS MC

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
André L.E. Fidelis , Felipe M.L. de Souza , Juliana de M. Nascimento , Ruy S.R. Neto , Luiz A.R. da Rosa , Simone C. Cardoso
{"title":"Influence of variance reduction techniques on conventional radiotherapy simulations with TOPAS MC","authors":"André L.E. Fidelis ,&nbsp;Felipe M.L. de Souza ,&nbsp;Juliana de M. Nascimento ,&nbsp;Ruy S.R. Neto ,&nbsp;Luiz A.R. da Rosa ,&nbsp;Simone C. Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to apply Geometrical Particle Splitting (GPS) and Importance Sampling (Ant Colony Method) as variance reduction techniques (VRT) to improve computational efficiency in Monte Carlo calculations of the conventional radiotherapy beam quality index, TPR<sub>20,10</sub>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The TOPAS was used to simulate a setup to determine the PDD<sub>20,10</sub> ratio using a water phantom at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm and a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup> field. TPR<sub>20,10</sub> values were calculated for each simulation using the 6 MV Elekta Precise linear accelerator IAEA phase space as source. Control simulations without VRTs provided a baseline. The influence of the number of split planes was evaluated for both techniques. The effects of VRT on photons and electrons were evaluated, focusing on computational efficiency compared to simulations without VRT. A Z-test assessed bias by checking compatibility between simulated and experimental TPR<sub>20,10</sub> values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TPR<sub>20,10</sub> results were validated for 3 σ compatibility with experimental data. The GPS technique's best results showed an efficiency gain factor of 4.01. Applying the technique to only photons or both photons and electrons did not yield significant differences. In Importance Sampling, the best results achieved a gain factor of 16.91 for both photons and electrons, but only yielded 0.75 for electrons alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VRTs significantly improved computational efficiency, though their effectiveness depends on geometry and particle selection. When applied carefully, these techniques enhance precision without greatly increasing processing time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 109797"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525001477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to apply Geometrical Particle Splitting (GPS) and Importance Sampling (Ant Colony Method) as variance reduction techniques (VRT) to improve computational efficiency in Monte Carlo calculations of the conventional radiotherapy beam quality index, TPR20,10.

Methods

The TOPAS was used to simulate a setup to determine the PDD20,10 ratio using a water phantom at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm and a 10 × 10 cm2 field. TPR20,10 values were calculated for each simulation using the 6 MV Elekta Precise linear accelerator IAEA phase space as source. Control simulations without VRTs provided a baseline. The influence of the number of split planes was evaluated for both techniques. The effects of VRT on photons and electrons were evaluated, focusing on computational efficiency compared to simulations without VRT. A Z-test assessed bias by checking compatibility between simulated and experimental TPR20,10 values.

Results

TPR20,10 results were validated for 3 σ compatibility with experimental data. The GPS technique's best results showed an efficiency gain factor of 4.01. Applying the technique to only photons or both photons and electrons did not yield significant differences. In Importance Sampling, the best results achieved a gain factor of 16.91 for both photons and electrons, but only yielded 0.75 for electrons alone.

Conclusions

VRTs significantly improved computational efficiency, though their effectiveness depends on geometry and particle selection. When applied carefully, these techniques enhance precision without greatly increasing processing time.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信