Predictors of survey non-response two years after hip arthroscopy: Results from an institutional prospective registry

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS

Journal of orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2025.02.005

Dominic J. Ventimiglia, Zachary Clark, Antoan Koshar, Michael A. McCurdy, Alexandra Baker Lutz, Michael S. Rocca, R. Frank Henn III, Sean J. Meredith

{"title":"Predictors of survey non-response two years after hip arthroscopy: Results from an institutional prospective registry","authors":"Dominic J. Ventimiglia, Zachary Clark, Antoan Koshar, Michael A. McCurdy, Alexandra Baker Lutz, Michael S. Rocca, R. Frank Henn III, Sean J. Meredith","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Survey-based studies are inherently subject to non-response bias. A comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to non-response is important for minimizing attrition bias and ensuring generalizability of results. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative factors associated with survey non-response 2 years after hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at a single center between October 2015 and March 2020 were approached for enrollment in a prospective registry. Patients were emailed an electronic survey at baseline and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was response to the 2-year postoperative survey. Patients who failed to complete any part of the 2-year postoperative survey after a series of standardized email, text message, and phone call reminders were considered non-responders. Baseline sociodemographics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between the groups using Pearson Chi-Squared or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of non-response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninty-nine patients were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. There were 25 non-responders (25 %) at 2 years. Non-responders demonstrated a higher proportion of patients who were male, identified as non-white, and did not respond to the 1-year postoperative survey. There were no differences in baseline PROs between responders and non-responders. When controlling for age and sex, patients who did not identify as white (OR = 4.3, 95 % CI [1.3, 14.4]) and patients who did not respond to the 1-year postoperative survey (OR = 4.5, 95 % CI [1.5, 13.8]) were more likely to be non-responders at 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Not responding to 1 year postoperative survey and non-white race are independent predictors of non-response at 2 years after hip arthroscopy. Baseline PROs do not differ between responders and non-responders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25000492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Survey-based studies are inherently subject to non-response bias. A comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to non-response is important for minimizing attrition bias and ensuring generalizability of results. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative factors associated with survey non-response 2 years after hip arthroscopy.

Methods

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at a single center between October 2015 and March 2020 were approached for enrollment in a prospective registry. Patients were emailed an electronic survey at baseline and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was response to the 2-year postoperative survey. Patients who failed to complete any part of the 2-year postoperative survey after a series of standardized email, text message, and phone call reminders were considered non-responders. Baseline sociodemographics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between the groups using Pearson Chi-Squared or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of non-response.

Results

Ninty-nine patients were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. There were 25 non-responders (25 %) at 2 years. Non-responders demonstrated a higher proportion of patients who were male, identified as non-white, and did not respond to the 1-year postoperative survey. There were no differences in baseline PROs between responders and non-responders. When controlling for age and sex, patients who did not identify as white (OR = 4.3, 95 % CI [1.3, 14.4]) and patients who did not respond to the 1-year postoperative survey (OR = 4.5, 95 % CI [1.5, 13.8]) were more likely to be non-responders at 2 years.

Conclusion

Not responding to 1 year postoperative survey and non-white race are independent predictors of non-response at 2 years after hip arthroscopy. Baseline PROs do not differ between responders and non-responders.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of orthopaedics ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

6.70%

发文量

202

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.