Andrés Díaz Lantada , Louisa Estadieu , Michael Gorki , Philipp Höfele , Monsur Islam
{"title":"Blurring the boundaries between living and non-living? Examining and mapping the living properties of engineered matter and systems","authors":"Andrés Díaz Lantada , Louisa Estadieu , Michael Gorki , Philipp Höfele , Monsur Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study revisits the long-going discourse concerning the distinction between living and non-living matter, specifically focusing on living and non-living synthetic materials and engineering creations. As the distinctions between these two categories become increasingly blurry, it becomes imperative to investigate the emerging field of “quasi-living” materials, structures, devices, and systems. The central objective here is to systematically compile and assess these contemporary quasi-living entities by mapping their life-like properties, as described in recent influential studies. To this end, this study first examines and compares the commonly accepted properties of life, culminating in an operative list of salient features from an engineering perspective. The quasi-living materials, structures, devices, and systems are methodically classified, elucidating their properties of life, considering both current state-of-the-art achievements and foreseeable advancements in short and medium terms. This assessment leads to a final discussion about the current frontiers between abiotic and living matter and their anticipated evolution, while addressing the ethical, legal, and societal actions, essential for the safe, beneficial, and sustainable research in these areas. The comprehensive study yields three main outcomes: a classification for identifying and addressing societal and ethical challenges, a preliminary legislative roadmap highlighting exemplary practices, and a set of urgent research directions demanding immediate attention from the research community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102822"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000120","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study revisits the long-going discourse concerning the distinction between living and non-living matter, specifically focusing on living and non-living synthetic materials and engineering creations. As the distinctions between these two categories become increasingly blurry, it becomes imperative to investigate the emerging field of “quasi-living” materials, structures, devices, and systems. The central objective here is to systematically compile and assess these contemporary quasi-living entities by mapping their life-like properties, as described in recent influential studies. To this end, this study first examines and compares the commonly accepted properties of life, culminating in an operative list of salient features from an engineering perspective. The quasi-living materials, structures, devices, and systems are methodically classified, elucidating their properties of life, considering both current state-of-the-art achievements and foreseeable advancements in short and medium terms. This assessment leads to a final discussion about the current frontiers between abiotic and living matter and their anticipated evolution, while addressing the ethical, legal, and societal actions, essential for the safe, beneficial, and sustainable research in these areas. The comprehensive study yields three main outcomes: a classification for identifying and addressing societal and ethical challenges, a preliminary legislative roadmap highlighting exemplary practices, and a set of urgent research directions demanding immediate attention from the research community.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.