Implementation of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework: A survey among IFOMPT organisations

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Firas Mourad , Rik Kranenburg , Wilfred Wilbrink , Alan Taylor , Roger Kerry , Nathan Hutting
{"title":"Implementation of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework: A survey among IFOMPT organisations","authors":"Firas Mourad ,&nbsp;Rik Kranenburg ,&nbsp;Wilfred Wilbrink ,&nbsp;Alan Taylor ,&nbsp;Roger Kerry ,&nbsp;Nathan Hutting","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The IFOMPT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists) Cervical Framework was first published in 2012 and reviewed in 2020. The document was a result of the IFOMPT Member Organisations’ (MO) request for consistency and guidance regarding teaching and practice of safe assessment and management of individuals with neck and head pain and dysfunction.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the knowledge, dissemination, and implementation of the 2020 IFOMPT Cervical Framework by MOs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An international survey with closed- and open-ended questions was conducted among all IFOMPT MOs. Formal informed consent was requested, and data were collected anonymously.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five of 42 invited organisations completed the survey. Respondents reported that the Framework was extensively disseminated to both members (100%) and educational programs (92%). 52% provided recommendations regarding implementation in the own country while only 12.5% towards educational programs. Five representatives (20%) reported having designed an information sheet for patients about cervical musculoskeletal interventions safety, mainly for thrust manipulation (84.3%) but none for exercise (0%). End-range thrust manipulation remains rarely recommended, especially for the upper cervical spine (8.7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The dissemination of the new IFOMPT Cervical Framework among members and educational programs was successful. However, only marginal recommendations were provided by the MOs/AMOs/RIGs regarding implementation of the Framework. Moreover, improvement is possible regarding providing information to patients and the Frameworks’ recommendation to avoid end range treatment techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 693-697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The IFOMPT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists) Cervical Framework was first published in 2012 and reviewed in 2020. The document was a result of the IFOMPT Member Organisations’ (MO) request for consistency and guidance regarding teaching and practice of safe assessment and management of individuals with neck and head pain and dysfunction.

Objective

To evaluate the knowledge, dissemination, and implementation of the 2020 IFOMPT Cervical Framework by MOs.

Methods

An international survey with closed- and open-ended questions was conducted among all IFOMPT MOs. Formal informed consent was requested, and data were collected anonymously.

Results

Twenty-five of 42 invited organisations completed the survey. Respondents reported that the Framework was extensively disseminated to both members (100%) and educational programs (92%). 52% provided recommendations regarding implementation in the own country while only 12.5% towards educational programs. Five representatives (20%) reported having designed an information sheet for patients about cervical musculoskeletal interventions safety, mainly for thrust manipulation (84.3%) but none for exercise (0%). End-range thrust manipulation remains rarely recommended, especially for the upper cervical spine (8.7%).

Conclusions

The dissemination of the new IFOMPT Cervical Framework among members and educational programs was successful. However, only marginal recommendations were provided by the MOs/AMOs/RIGs regarding implementation of the Framework. Moreover, improvement is possible regarding providing information to patients and the Frameworks’ recommendation to avoid end range treatment techniques.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信