Firas Mourad , Rik Kranenburg , Wilfred Wilbrink , Alan Taylor , Roger Kerry , Nathan Hutting
{"title":"Implementation of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework: A survey among IFOMPT organisations","authors":"Firas Mourad , Rik Kranenburg , Wilfred Wilbrink , Alan Taylor , Roger Kerry , Nathan Hutting","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The IFOMPT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists) Cervical Framework was first published in 2012 and reviewed in 2020. The document was a result of the IFOMPT Member Organisations’ (MO) request for consistency and guidance regarding teaching and practice of safe assessment and management of individuals with neck and head pain and dysfunction.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the knowledge, dissemination, and implementation of the 2020 IFOMPT Cervical Framework by MOs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An international survey with closed- and open-ended questions was conducted among all IFOMPT MOs. Formal informed consent was requested, and data were collected anonymously.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five of 42 invited organisations completed the survey. Respondents reported that the Framework was extensively disseminated to both members (100%) and educational programs (92%). 52% provided recommendations regarding implementation in the own country while only 12.5% towards educational programs. Five representatives (20%) reported having designed an information sheet for patients about cervical musculoskeletal interventions safety, mainly for thrust manipulation (84.3%) but none for exercise (0%). End-range thrust manipulation remains rarely recommended, especially for the upper cervical spine (8.7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The dissemination of the new IFOMPT Cervical Framework among members and educational programs was successful. However, only marginal recommendations were provided by the MOs/AMOs/RIGs regarding implementation of the Framework. Moreover, improvement is possible regarding providing information to patients and the Frameworks’ recommendation to avoid end range treatment techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 693-697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The IFOMPT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists) Cervical Framework was first published in 2012 and reviewed in 2020. The document was a result of the IFOMPT Member Organisations’ (MO) request for consistency and guidance regarding teaching and practice of safe assessment and management of individuals with neck and head pain and dysfunction.
Objective
To evaluate the knowledge, dissemination, and implementation of the 2020 IFOMPT Cervical Framework by MOs.
Methods
An international survey with closed- and open-ended questions was conducted among all IFOMPT MOs. Formal informed consent was requested, and data were collected anonymously.
Results
Twenty-five of 42 invited organisations completed the survey. Respondents reported that the Framework was extensively disseminated to both members (100%) and educational programs (92%). 52% provided recommendations regarding implementation in the own country while only 12.5% towards educational programs. Five representatives (20%) reported having designed an information sheet for patients about cervical musculoskeletal interventions safety, mainly for thrust manipulation (84.3%) but none for exercise (0%). End-range thrust manipulation remains rarely recommended, especially for the upper cervical spine (8.7%).
Conclusions
The dissemination of the new IFOMPT Cervical Framework among members and educational programs was successful. However, only marginal recommendations were provided by the MOs/AMOs/RIGs regarding implementation of the Framework. Moreover, improvement is possible regarding providing information to patients and the Frameworks’ recommendation to avoid end range treatment techniques.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina