Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle

Jancy Jeffus , Kevin Wagner , Laura Goodman , Todd Parker , Blake Wilson , Andrew Foote , Ryan Reuter
{"title":"Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle","authors":"Jancy Jeffus ,&nbsp;Kevin Wagner ,&nbsp;Laura Goodman ,&nbsp;Todd Parker ,&nbsp;Blake Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrew Foote ,&nbsp;Ryan Reuter","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Virtual fence (VF) technology is rapidly developing and being adopted, but many ranchers and consumers have questions about its effect on the welfare of range beef cattle.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We conducted two studies using either VF collars or conventional electric fencing to rotationally graze beef cattle. We measured several common physiological and behavioral indicators of stress and correlated these indicators with the number of electric stimuli received from the VF collars.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Physiological and behavioral indicators of stress were not different between cattle rotated within the two types of fencing. No correlations were evident between the number of electrical stimuli received and stress indicators. From the perspective of cattle welfare, we concluded that continued development and use of VF is warranted.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Virtual fence (VF) technology is rapidly developing and being adopted, but many ranchers and consumers have questions about its effect on the welfare of range beef cattle.
  • We conducted two studies using either VF collars or conventional electric fencing to rotationally graze beef cattle. We measured several common physiological and behavioral indicators of stress and correlated these indicators with the number of electric stimuli received from the VF collars.
  • Physiological and behavioral indicators of stress were not different between cattle rotated within the two types of fencing. No correlations were evident between the number of electrical stimuli received and stress indicators. From the perspective of cattle welfare, we concluded that continued development and use of VF is warranted.
在轮流放养的肉牛中,虚拟围栏并不比传统的电动围栏更有压力
•虚拟围栏(VF)技术正在迅速发展并被采用,但许多牧场主和消费者对其对牧场肉牛福利的影响存在疑问。•我们进行了两项研究,使用VF项圈或传统电围栏轮流放牧肉牛。我们测量了几种常见的应激生理和行为指标,并将这些指标与从VF项圈接收的电刺激次数相关联。•在两种围栏内轮换的牛的生理和行为指标没有差异。受电刺激次数与应激指标之间无明显相关性。从牛福利的角度来看,我们认为继续开发和利用VF是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信