Upskilling pain relief after surgery: a scoping review of perioperative behavioral intervention efficacy and practical considerations for implementation.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Beth D Darnall, Lauren Abshire, Rena E Courtney, Sara Davin
{"title":"Upskilling pain relief after surgery: a scoping review of perioperative behavioral intervention efficacy and practical considerations for implementation.","authors":"Beth D Darnall, Lauren Abshire, Rena E Courtney, Sara Davin","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perioperative skills-based interventions may support non-pharmacological management of pain and opioid reduction after surgery. Such interventions may target and enhance predictors for surgical recovery and possibly reduce chronic postsurgical pain. Existing meta-analyses are limited by inclusion of studies that are either non-surgical or with outcomes occurring only in the hours after surgery. Lacking is a scoping review of studies testing perioperative skills-based interventions for postsurgical pain relief and opioid reduction in the days and months after surgery. We reviewed the efficacy of perioperative behavioral interventions; over what time frame and in which surgical populations efficacy evidence exists; and whether such interventions can prevent chronic postsurgical pain. 20 randomized trials were included, with the following intervention types: hypnosis, relaxation therapy, stress management training, mindfulness, mixed-type skills interventions (mind-body skills, preoperative pain self-management, empowered relief for surgery); cognitive behavioral-therapy (CBT); and mindfulness-based CBT. We summarize study methods, treatment specifics, and analgesic effects. No studies were designed to test intervention efficacy for preventing chronic postsurgical pain. Only two studies used active controls as the study comparator. Two studies showed positive effects on postsurgical opioid use. No studies tested whether the interventions enhanced time to pain cessation after surgery. Four studies demonstrated durable analgesic effects at 3-12 months after surgery. We describe the real-world practicality of intervention integration into the perioperative pathway and provide dissemination and implementation methodologies that may increase intervention uptake and therefore fulfill calls from national agencies to better integrate behavioral pain treatments into perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"50 2","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative skills-based interventions may support non-pharmacological management of pain and opioid reduction after surgery. Such interventions may target and enhance predictors for surgical recovery and possibly reduce chronic postsurgical pain. Existing meta-analyses are limited by inclusion of studies that are either non-surgical or with outcomes occurring only in the hours after surgery. Lacking is a scoping review of studies testing perioperative skills-based interventions for postsurgical pain relief and opioid reduction in the days and months after surgery. We reviewed the efficacy of perioperative behavioral interventions; over what time frame and in which surgical populations efficacy evidence exists; and whether such interventions can prevent chronic postsurgical pain. 20 randomized trials were included, with the following intervention types: hypnosis, relaxation therapy, stress management training, mindfulness, mixed-type skills interventions (mind-body skills, preoperative pain self-management, empowered relief for surgery); cognitive behavioral-therapy (CBT); and mindfulness-based CBT. We summarize study methods, treatment specifics, and analgesic effects. No studies were designed to test intervention efficacy for preventing chronic postsurgical pain. Only two studies used active controls as the study comparator. Two studies showed positive effects on postsurgical opioid use. No studies tested whether the interventions enhanced time to pain cessation after surgery. Four studies demonstrated durable analgesic effects at 3-12 months after surgery. We describe the real-world practicality of intervention integration into the perioperative pathway and provide dissemination and implementation methodologies that may increase intervention uptake and therefore fulfill calls from national agencies to better integrate behavioral pain treatments into perioperative care.

Abstract Image

提高手术后疼痛的缓解:围手术期行为干预的疗效和实施的实际考虑的范围审查。
围手术期以技能为基础的干预措施可能支持术后疼痛的非药物管理和阿片类药物的减少。这些干预措施可能针对并增强手术恢复的预测因素,并可能减少慢性术后疼痛。现有的荟萃分析受限于纳入了非手术研究或仅在手术后数小时内发生结果的研究。缺乏对围手术期技术干预对术后疼痛缓解和阿片类药物减少的研究的范围审查。我们回顾了围手术期行为干预的效果;在什么时间范围和哪些手术人群中存在有效性证据;以及这些干预措施是否能预防慢性术后疼痛。纳入20项随机试验,干预类型包括:催眠、放松疗法、压力管理训练、正念、混合型技能干预(身心技能、术前疼痛自我管理、手术授权缓解);认知行为疗法(CBT);以及基于正念的认知行为疗法。我们总结了研究方法、治疗特点和镇痛效果。没有研究旨在测试预防慢性术后疼痛的干预效果。只有两项研究使用主动对照作为研究比较。两项研究显示了对术后阿片类药物使用的积极影响。没有研究测试干预是否延长了手术后疼痛停止的时间。四项研究显示手术后3-12个月的持久镇痛效果。我们描述了将干预整合到围手术期途径的现实实用性,并提供了传播和实施方法,可以增加干预的吸收,从而满足国家机构的要求,更好地将行为疼痛治疗整合到围手术期护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信