First validation of the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score purposely designed for use by emergency medical dispatchers for detecting anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000859
Matthias L Herrmann, Florian F Schuchardt, Clara Franck, Simone Meier, Max Henningsen, Friederike S Brohl, Christoph Sonntag, Nicole Wimmesberger, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Hans-Jörg Busch, Christian A Taschner, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Jochen Brich
{"title":"First validation of the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score purposely designed for use by emergency medical dispatchers for detecting anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in patients with suspected stroke.","authors":"Matthias L Herrmann, Florian F Schuchardt, Clara Franck, Simone Meier, Max Henningsen, Friederike S Brohl, Christoph Sonntag, Nicole Wimmesberger, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Hans-Jörg Busch, Christian A Taschner, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Jochen Brich","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Detecting an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (aLVO) as a cause of stroke during emergency calls could optimise dispatch, particularly in rural areas. Numerous stroke severity scales assessing motor and cortical signs have been designed for direct patient contact; however, none have been purposely designed for emergency calls. This study aimed to prospectively validate the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score (FRENS) in patients presenting with a suspected acute stroke to detect aLVO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years with suspected acute stroke brought directly to our tertiary hospital by paramedics, between May 2021 and 2022, were included in this study. We used the FRENS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to analyse the FRENS convergent validity. We evaluated and compared the predictive ability and test characteristics of the FRENS and five established NIHSS-based stroke severity scales for the detection of an aLVO stroke. We analysed the number of steps required for the completion of the FRENS algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1042 analysed patients, the FRENS items showed high convergent validity with corresponding NIHSS items. A positive FRENS was statistically significantly correlated with an aLVO stroke. The FRENS had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values for an aLVO stroke and the highest sensitivity value for M2 occlusions. The FRENS provided results after two and all four steps, in 71% and <3% of cases, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FRENS enabled the rapid, sensitive detection of an aLVO in patients with suspected acute stroke. Designed for use in emergency calls, the FRENS requires translation and validation in a prehospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: Detecting an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (aLVO) as a cause of stroke during emergency calls could optimise dispatch, particularly in rural areas. Numerous stroke severity scales assessing motor and cortical signs have been designed for direct patient contact; however, none have been purposely designed for emergency calls. This study aimed to prospectively validate the novel Freiburg Neurointerventional Score (FRENS) in patients presenting with a suspected acute stroke to detect aLVO.

Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with suspected acute stroke brought directly to our tertiary hospital by paramedics, between May 2021 and 2022, were included in this study. We used the FRENS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to analyse the FRENS convergent validity. We evaluated and compared the predictive ability and test characteristics of the FRENS and five established NIHSS-based stroke severity scales for the detection of an aLVO stroke. We analysed the number of steps required for the completion of the FRENS algorithm.

Results: Among the 1042 analysed patients, the FRENS items showed high convergent validity with corresponding NIHSS items. A positive FRENS was statistically significantly correlated with an aLVO stroke. The FRENS had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values for an aLVO stroke and the highest sensitivity value for M2 occlusions. The FRENS provided results after two and all four steps, in 71% and <3% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions: The FRENS enabled the rapid, sensitive detection of an aLVO in patients with suspected acute stroke. Designed for use in emergency calls, the FRENS requires translation and validation in a prehospital setting.

首次验证新的Freiburg神经介入评分,该评分专门设计用于检测疑似卒中患者的前循环大血管闭塞。
背景:在紧急呼叫中检测前循环大血管闭塞(aLVO)作为卒中的原因可以优化调度,特别是在农村地区。许多评估运动和皮质症状的中风严重程度量表被设计用于直接与患者接触;然而,没有一个是专门为紧急呼叫而设计的。本研究旨在前瞻性验证新型Freiburg神经介入评分(FRENS)在疑似急性卒中患者中检测aLVO的有效性。方法:纳入2021年5月至2022年5月期间由护理人员直接送到我院三级医院的年龄≥18岁的疑似急性脑卒中患者。我们使用FRENS和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)来分析FRENS的收敛效度。我们评估并比较了FRENS和五种基于nihss的卒中严重程度量表检测aLVO卒中的预测能力和测试特征。我们分析了完成FRENS算法所需的步数。结果:分析的1042例患者中,FRENS项目与相应的NIHSS项目具有较高的收敛效度。FRENS阳性与aLVO卒中有统计学显著相关。FRENS对aLVO卒中具有最高的敏感性和阴性预测值,对M2闭塞具有最高的敏感性值。结论:FRENS能够快速、灵敏地检测疑似急性卒中患者的aLVO。设计用于紧急呼叫的FRENS需要在院前环境中进行翻译和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信