Machine learning research methods to predict postoperative pain and opioid use: a narrative review.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Dale J Langford, Julia F Reichel, Haoyan Zhong, Benjamin H Basseri, Marc P Koch, Ramana Kolady, Jiabin Liu, Alexandra Sideris, Robert H Dworkin, Jashvant Poeran, Christopher L Wu
{"title":"Machine learning research methods to predict postoperative pain and opioid use: a narrative review.","authors":"Dale J Langford, Julia F Reichel, Haoyan Zhong, Benjamin H Basseri, Marc P Koch, Ramana Kolady, Jiabin Liu, Alexandra Sideris, Robert H Dworkin, Jashvant Poeran, Christopher L Wu","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of machine learning to predict postoperative pain and opioid use has likely been catalyzed by the availability of complex patient-level data, computational and statistical advancements, the prevalence and impact of chronic postsurgical pain, and the persistence of the opioid crisis. The objectives of this narrative review were to identify and characterize methodological aspects of studies that have developed and/or tested machine learning algorithms to predict acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgery and to propose considerations for future machine learning studies. Pairs of independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts of 280 PubMed-indexed articles and ultimately extracted data from 61 studies that met entry criteria. We observed a marked increase in the number of relevant publications over time. Studies most commonly focused on machine learning algorithms to predict chronic postsurgical pain or opioid use, using real-world data from patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. We identified variability in sample size, number and type of predictors, and how outcome variables were defined. Patient-reported predictors were highlighted as particularly informative and important to include in such machine learning algorithms, where possible. We hope that findings from this review might inform future applications of machine learning that improve the performance and clinical utility of resultant machine learning algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"50 2","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of machine learning to predict postoperative pain and opioid use has likely been catalyzed by the availability of complex patient-level data, computational and statistical advancements, the prevalence and impact of chronic postsurgical pain, and the persistence of the opioid crisis. The objectives of this narrative review were to identify and characterize methodological aspects of studies that have developed and/or tested machine learning algorithms to predict acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgery and to propose considerations for future machine learning studies. Pairs of independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts of 280 PubMed-indexed articles and ultimately extracted data from 61 studies that met entry criteria. We observed a marked increase in the number of relevant publications over time. Studies most commonly focused on machine learning algorithms to predict chronic postsurgical pain or opioid use, using real-world data from patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. We identified variability in sample size, number and type of predictors, and how outcome variables were defined. Patient-reported predictors were highlighted as particularly informative and important to include in such machine learning algorithms, where possible. We hope that findings from this review might inform future applications of machine learning that improve the performance and clinical utility of resultant machine learning algorithms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信