Multiple ligands simultaneous molecular docking and dynamics approach to study the synergetic inhibitory of curcumin analogs on ErbB4 tyrosine phosphorylation.

IF 2.1 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.4103/RPS.RPS_191_23
La Ode Aman, Netty Ino Ischak, Teti Sutriyati Tuloli, Arfan Arfan, Aiyi Asnawi
{"title":"Multiple ligands simultaneous molecular docking and dynamics approach to study the synergetic inhibitory of curcumin analogs on ErbB4 tyrosine phosphorylation.","authors":"La Ode Aman, Netty Ino Ischak, Teti Sutriyati Tuloli, Arfan Arfan, Aiyi Asnawi","doi":"10.4103/RPS.RPS_191_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Lapatinib (FMM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are anticancer drugs employed in a combination approach. FMM inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of ErbB4 while 5-FU inhibits cell proliferation. This research aimed to investigate the potential of two compounds, namely (1E,4E)-1,5-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) penta-1,4-dien-3-one (AC01) and (1E,4E)-1,5-bis (3,4-dihydroxy phenyl) penta-1,4-dien-3-one (AC02), both as individual inhibitors and combination partners with FMM, targeting ErbB4 inhibition. AC01 and AC02 were combined with FMM, which targets ErbB4. The combination of 5-FU with FMM served as a reference in this study.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>The research utilized computational simulation methods such as single and multiple ligands simultaneously docking and dynamics. Data analysis was performed using AutoDockTools and gmx_MMPBSA.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>Single docking results indicated that 5-FU exhibited the lowest binding affinity, while FMM demonstrated the highest. Simultaneous docking of AC01 and AC02 paired with FMM revealed their binding positions overlapping with the FMM-5-FU workspace. The FMM-AC01 and FMM-AC02 complexes exhibited slightly weaker binding affinities compared to FMM-5-FU. In combination with FMM, AC01 and AC02 occupied the ErbB4 activation loop, whereas 5-FU was outside the activation loop. Furthermore, in their interaction with ErbB4, AC02 exhibited slightly stronger binding than AC01, as confirmed by the average binding free energy calculations from molecular dynamics simulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>In conclusion, computational simulations indicated that both AC01 and AC02 have the potential to act as anticancer candidates, demonstrating ErbB4 inhibitory potential both as individual agents and in synergy with FMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21075,"journal":{"name":"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"19 6","pages":"754-765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/RPS.RPS_191_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Lapatinib (FMM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are anticancer drugs employed in a combination approach. FMM inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of ErbB4 while 5-FU inhibits cell proliferation. This research aimed to investigate the potential of two compounds, namely (1E,4E)-1,5-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) penta-1,4-dien-3-one (AC01) and (1E,4E)-1,5-bis (3,4-dihydroxy phenyl) penta-1,4-dien-3-one (AC02), both as individual inhibitors and combination partners with FMM, targeting ErbB4 inhibition. AC01 and AC02 were combined with FMM, which targets ErbB4. The combination of 5-FU with FMM served as a reference in this study.

Experimental approach: The research utilized computational simulation methods such as single and multiple ligands simultaneously docking and dynamics. Data analysis was performed using AutoDockTools and gmx_MMPBSA.

Findings/results: Single docking results indicated that 5-FU exhibited the lowest binding affinity, while FMM demonstrated the highest. Simultaneous docking of AC01 and AC02 paired with FMM revealed their binding positions overlapping with the FMM-5-FU workspace. The FMM-AC01 and FMM-AC02 complexes exhibited slightly weaker binding affinities compared to FMM-5-FU. In combination with FMM, AC01 and AC02 occupied the ErbB4 activation loop, whereas 5-FU was outside the activation loop. Furthermore, in their interaction with ErbB4, AC02 exhibited slightly stronger binding than AC01, as confirmed by the average binding free energy calculations from molecular dynamics simulations.

Conclusion and implications: In conclusion, computational simulations indicated that both AC01 and AC02 have the potential to act as anticancer candidates, demonstrating ErbB4 inhibitory potential both as individual agents and in synergy with FMM.

多配体同时分子对接和动力学方法研究姜黄素类似物协同抑制ErbB4酪氨酸磷酸化。
背景与目的:拉帕替尼(FMM)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)是联合应用的抗癌药物。FMM抑制ErbB4酪氨酸磷酸化,而5-FU抑制细胞增殖。本研究旨在探讨(1E,4E)-1,5-双(4-羟基苯基)- 1,4-二烯-3-one (AC01)和(1E,4E)-1,5-双(3,4-二羟基苯基)- 1,4-二烯-3-one (AC02)这两种化合物作为FMM的单独抑制剂和联合抑制剂的潜力,以抑制ErbB4。AC01和AC02与FMM联合靶向ErbB4。本研究以5-FU联合FMM作为参考。实验方法:采用单配体与多配体同时对接、动力学等计算模拟方法。使用AutoDockTools和gmx_MMPBSA进行数据分析。发现/结果:单对接结果显示5-FU的结合亲和力最低,FMM的结合亲和力最高。AC01和AC02与FMM同时对接,发现它们的结合位置与FMM-5- fu工作空间重叠。与FMM-5-FU相比,FMM-AC01和FMM-AC02配合物的结合亲和力稍弱。与FMM联合,AC01和AC02占据ErbB4激活环,而5-FU在激活环外。此外,在与ErbB4的相互作用中,AC02表现出比AC01稍强的结合,这一点得到了分子动力学模拟计算的平均结合自由能的证实。结论和意义:总之,计算模拟表明AC01和AC02都有可能作为抗癌候选药物,无论是作为单独的药物还是与FMM协同作用,都显示出抑制ErbB4的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences
Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences (RPS) is included in Thomson Reuters ESCI Web of Science (searchable at WoS master journal list), indexed with PubMed and PubMed Central and abstracted in the Elsevier Bibliographic Databases. Databases include Scopus, EMBASE, EMCare, EMBiology and Elsevier BIOBASE. It is also indexed in several specialized databases including Scientific Information Database (SID), Google Scholar, Iran Medex, Magiran, Index Copernicus (IC) and Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信