The use of machine learning based models to predict the severity of community acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients: A systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Caitlin Lythgoe, David Oliver Hamilton, Brian W Johnston, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Ivan Olier, Ingeborg Welters
{"title":"The use of machine learning based models to predict the severity of community acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients: A systematic review.","authors":"Caitlin Lythgoe, David Oliver Hamilton, Brian W Johnston, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Ivan Olier, Ingeborg Welters","doi":"10.1177/17511437251315319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common cause of hospital admission. CAP carries significant risk of adverse outcomes including organ dysfunction, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Earlier admission to ICU for those with severe CAP is associated with better outcomes. Traditional prediction models are used in clinical practice to predict the severity of CAP. However, accuracy of predicting severity may be improved by using machine learning (ML) based models with added advantages of automation and speed. This systematic review evaluates the evidence base of ML-prediction tools in predicting CAP severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were systematically searched for studies that used ML-based models to predict mortality and/or ICU admission in CAP patients, where a performance metric was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11 papers including a total of 351,365 CAP patients were included. All papers predicted severity and four predicted ICU admission. Most papers applied multiple ML algorithms to datasets and derived area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98 at best performance and 0.57 at worst, with a mixed performance against traditional prediction tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although ML models showed good performance at predicting CAP severity, the variables selected for inclusion in each model varied significantly which limited comparisons between models and there was a lack of reproducible data, limiting validity. Future research should focus on validating ML predication models in multiple cohorts to derive robust, reproducible performance measures, and to demonstrate a benefit in terms of patient outcomes and resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251315319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251315319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common cause of hospital admission. CAP carries significant risk of adverse outcomes including organ dysfunction, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Earlier admission to ICU for those with severe CAP is associated with better outcomes. Traditional prediction models are used in clinical practice to predict the severity of CAP. However, accuracy of predicting severity may be improved by using machine learning (ML) based models with added advantages of automation and speed. This systematic review evaluates the evidence base of ML-prediction tools in predicting CAP severity.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were systematically searched for studies that used ML-based models to predict mortality and/or ICU admission in CAP patients, where a performance metric was reported.

Results: 11 papers including a total of 351,365 CAP patients were included. All papers predicted severity and four predicted ICU admission. Most papers applied multiple ML algorithms to datasets and derived area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98 at best performance and 0.57 at worst, with a mixed performance against traditional prediction tools.

Conclusion: Although ML models showed good performance at predicting CAP severity, the variables selected for inclusion in each model varied significantly which limited comparisons between models and there was a lack of reproducible data, limiting validity. Future research should focus on validating ML predication models in multiple cohorts to derive robust, reproducible performance measures, and to demonstrate a benefit in terms of patient outcomes and resource use.

使用基于机器学习的模型来预测住院患者社区获得性肺炎的严重程度:系统综述。
背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是一种常见的住院原因。CAP有显著的不良后果风险,包括器官功能障碍、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和死亡。重症CAP患者较早入住ICU可获得较好的预后。传统的预测模型在临床实践中用于预测CAP的严重程度。然而,使用基于机器学习(ML)的模型可以提高预测严重程度的准确性,并具有自动化和速度的优势。本系统综述评估了预测CAP严重程度的ml预测工具的证据基础。方法:系统地检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和PubMed中使用基于ml的模型预测CAP患者死亡率和/或ICU住院的研究,其中报告了绩效指标。结果:共纳入11篇论文,共351365例CAP患者。所有论文预测严重程度,4篇预测ICU住院。大多数论文将多个ML算法应用于数据集,并推导出接收者算子特征曲线下的面积(AUROC),最佳性能为0.98,最差性能为0.57,与传统预测工具相比性能好坏不一。结论:尽管ML模型在预测CAP严重程度方面表现良好,但每个模型中选择的变量差异很大,这限制了模型之间的比较,并且缺乏可重复的数据,限制了有效性。未来的研究应侧重于在多个队列中验证机器学习预测模型,以获得可靠的、可重复的性能测量,并证明在患者结果和资源使用方面的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信