Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew G Bowles, Autumn D Zuckerman, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Mackenzie Ellis, Chelsea P Renfro
{"title":"Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.","authors":"Matthew G Bowles, Autumn D Zuckerman, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Mackenzie Ellis, Chelsea P Renfro","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) use step therapy requirements and formulary alternatives to reduce prescription spending. The clinical utility and ultimate therapy outcomes for patients participating in these programs is an area of needed research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate medication outcomes and time requirements to access therapy in patients required to use a step therapy or formulary alternative after being prescribed a specialty medication for psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective review of data collected from electronic health records and the specialty pharmacy patient management system was conducted. Patients were included if they had a referral for a specialty medication by a dermatology provider for PsO or AD that was discontinued because of the payer/PBM requiring step therapy or formulary alternative use from January 2021 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the number of days from the time of patient referral for specialty medication until the second specialty medication referral. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients that failed step therapy or formulary alternative and were referred back to the specialty pharmacy as well as the number of patients not started on a specialty medication and the reason.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The included patients (N = 83) were predominantly White (75%) and female (61%) with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-61 years). 51% of patients had an indication of AD. 62 patients were required to use step therapy, and 21 were required to use a formulary alternative. Of the patients required to use step therapy, 37 (60%) had a second referral for a specialty medication because of failing step therapy requirements, with a median time to a second referral of 75 days (IQR = 27-135). The remaining 25 patients were not started on a specialty medication: 5 patients (8%) benefited from and remained on step therapy, 15 (24%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (5%) decided not to start step therapy, and 2 (3%) were referred for psoriatic arthritis evaluation. All patients required to use a formulary alternative initiated specialty medication with a median time from the initial referral to second referral of 3 days (IQR = 1-9 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients required to complete nonspecialty step therapy ultimately initiated specialty medications after a lengthy delay, demonstrating the potential impact of step therapy requirements on initiating clinically appropriate treatment for AD and PsO. Further research assessing the financial burden and clinical impact of requiring step therapy before specialty medications is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 2","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) use step therapy requirements and formulary alternatives to reduce prescription spending. The clinical utility and ultimate therapy outcomes for patients participating in these programs is an area of needed research.

Objective: To evaluate medication outcomes and time requirements to access therapy in patients required to use a step therapy or formulary alternative after being prescribed a specialty medication for psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods: A single-center, retrospective review of data collected from electronic health records and the specialty pharmacy patient management system was conducted. Patients were included if they had a referral for a specialty medication by a dermatology provider for PsO or AD that was discontinued because of the payer/PBM requiring step therapy or formulary alternative use from January 2021 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the number of days from the time of patient referral for specialty medication until the second specialty medication referral. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients that failed step therapy or formulary alternative and were referred back to the specialty pharmacy as well as the number of patients not started on a specialty medication and the reason.

Results: The included patients (N = 83) were predominantly White (75%) and female (61%) with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-61 years). 51% of patients had an indication of AD. 62 patients were required to use step therapy, and 21 were required to use a formulary alternative. Of the patients required to use step therapy, 37 (60%) had a second referral for a specialty medication because of failing step therapy requirements, with a median time to a second referral of 75 days (IQR = 27-135). The remaining 25 patients were not started on a specialty medication: 5 patients (8%) benefited from and remained on step therapy, 15 (24%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (5%) decided not to start step therapy, and 2 (3%) were referred for psoriatic arthritis evaluation. All patients required to use a formulary alternative initiated specialty medication with a median time from the initial referral to second referral of 3 days (IQR = 1-9 days).

Conclusions: Most patients required to complete nonspecialty step therapy ultimately initiated specialty medications after a lengthy delay, demonstrating the potential impact of step therapy requirements on initiating clinically appropriate treatment for AD and PsO. Further research assessing the financial burden and clinical impact of requiring step therapy before specialty medications is warranted.

皮肤病炎症的专科治疗:治疗要求和患者旅程。
背景:许多支付方和药房福利管理人员(PBMs)使用步骤治疗要求和处方替代方案来减少处方支出。参与这些项目的患者的临床效用和最终治疗结果是一个需要研究的领域。目的:评估牛皮癣(PsO)或特应性皮炎(AD)患者在接受专科药物治疗后需要使用步骤治疗或处方替代疗法的药物治疗结果和时间要求。方法:对电子病历和专科药房患者管理系统收集的数据进行单中心回顾性分析。如果患者在2021年1月至2022年6月期间因付款人/PBM需要步骤治疗或处方替代使用而停止使用皮肤病提供者推荐的PsO或AD专科药物,则纳入患者。主要结局是从患者转诊到第二次转诊到专科用药的天数。次要结果包括步骤治疗或处方替代治疗失败并被转回专业药房的患者数量,以及未开始使用专业药物的患者数量及其原因。结果:纳入的患者(N = 83)以白人(75%)和女性(61%)为主,中位年龄为50岁(四分位数间距[IQR] = 37 ~ 61岁)。51%的患者有AD的指征。62名患者需要使用阶梯疗法,21名患者需要使用处方替代疗法。在需要使用步骤治疗的患者中,37例(60%)因步骤治疗要求失败而再次转诊专科药物,第二次转诊的中位时间为75天(IQR = 27-135)。其余25例患者未开始接受特殊药物治疗:5例患者(8%)受益于分步治疗并继续接受分步治疗,15例(24%)失去随访,3例(5%)决定不开始分步治疗,2例(3%)转诊进行银屑病关节炎评估。所有需要使用处方替代方案的患者开始使用专科药物,从首次转诊到第二次转诊的中位时间为3天(IQR = 1-9天)。结论:大多数需要完成非专业步骤治疗的患者在漫长的延迟后最终开始了专业药物治疗,这表明步骤治疗要求对启动临床适当治疗AD和PsO的潜在影响。进一步的研究评估的财政负担和临床影响需要在专业药物治疗前的步骤治疗是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信