Assessing the Clinical Impact of Emergency Physician-performed Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks in a Level 1 Trauma Center: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_8_24
Sanjeev Bhoi, Bharath Gopinath, Utkarsh Khandelwal, Rakesh Nayaka, Jyothiswaroop Bhaskararayuni, Devansh Gupta, Ayush Srivastava, Anisha Anshu, Aaditya Katyal, Tej Prakash Sinha
{"title":"Assessing the Clinical Impact of Emergency Physician-performed Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks in a Level 1 Trauma Center: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Sanjeev Bhoi, Bharath Gopinath, Utkarsh Khandelwal, Rakesh Nayaka, Jyothiswaroop Bhaskararayuni, Devansh Gupta, Ayush Srivastava, Anisha Anshu, Aaditya Katyal, Tej Prakash Sinha","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_8_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective pain management is crucial in the emergency department (ED), particularly for trauma patients. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia (UGRA) has emerged as a promising technique for acute pain relief. The objective of this study is to describe the various UGRA performed and assess their effectiveness among trauma patients in our Level 1 Trauma Center ED over the past 2.5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 485 trauma patients who underwent UGRA over 2.5 years were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the median Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) reduction at 30 min and 1 h after nerve block administration. Patient characteristics, types of nerve blocks administered, procedural details, and outcomes were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the median reduction in pain scores and evaluate the success of UGRA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UGRA demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores, with a median DVPRS decrease from 9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9-10) preprocedure to 4 (IQR: 2-5) at 30 min and 1 (IQR: 0-2) at 1 h postprocedure. Sixteen types of nerve blocks were administered in our ED, with the serratus anterior block (<i>n</i> = 91) and fascia iliaca compartment block (<i>n</i> = 58) being the most common. Pain relief was the most common indication for block administration. A higher volume was injected for plane blocks compared to nerve-specific blocks. No complications or failed blocks were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes 16 different UGRA that can be performed by emergency physicians (EPs) in ED for trauma patients. UGRA is effective in providing substantial pain relief for trauma patients in the ED. UGRA performed by EPs offers a safe and feasible approach for managing acute pain in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 4","pages":"193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_8_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective pain management is crucial in the emergency department (ED), particularly for trauma patients. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia (UGRA) has emerged as a promising technique for acute pain relief. The objective of this study is to describe the various UGRA performed and assess their effectiveness among trauma patients in our Level 1 Trauma Center ED over the past 2.5 years.

Methods: Data from 485 trauma patients who underwent UGRA over 2.5 years were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the median Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) reduction at 30 min and 1 h after nerve block administration. Patient characteristics, types of nerve blocks administered, procedural details, and outcomes were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the median reduction in pain scores and evaluate the success of UGRA.

Results: UGRA demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores, with a median DVPRS decrease from 9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9-10) preprocedure to 4 (IQR: 2-5) at 30 min and 1 (IQR: 0-2) at 1 h postprocedure. Sixteen types of nerve blocks were administered in our ED, with the serratus anterior block (n = 91) and fascia iliaca compartment block (n = 58) being the most common. Pain relief was the most common indication for block administration. A higher volume was injected for plane blocks compared to nerve-specific blocks. No complications or failed blocks were reported.

Conclusion: This study describes 16 different UGRA that can be performed by emergency physicians (EPs) in ED for trauma patients. UGRA is effective in providing substantial pain relief for trauma patients in the ED. UGRA performed by EPs offers a safe and feasible approach for managing acute pain in the ED.

评估急诊医师在1级创伤中心实施超声引导周围神经阻滞的临床影响:回顾性分析。
简介:有效的疼痛管理是至关重要的急诊科(ED),特别是对创伤患者。超声引导局部镇痛(UGRA)已成为一种很有前途的急性疼痛缓解技术。本研究的目的是描述在过去的两年半里,我们的一级创伤中心急诊科在创伤患者中实施的各种UGRA,并评估其有效性。方法:回顾性分析485例创伤患者2.5年以上的UGRA治疗资料。主要结果是在神经阻滞治疗后30分钟和1小时,国防和退伍军人疼痛评定量表(DVPRS)中位数下降。患者特征、神经阻滞类型、手术细节和结果也被记录下来。通过统计分析确定疼痛评分中位数降低,并评估UGRA的成功程度。结果:UGRA显著降低了疼痛评分,中位DVPRS从术前的9(四分位间距[IQR]: 9-10)下降到术后30分钟的4 (IQR: 2-5)和术后1小时的1 (IQR: 0-2)。我们在ED中使用了16种类型的神经阻滞,其中前锯肌阻滞(n = 91)和髂筋膜室阻滞(n = 58)是最常见的。止痛是阻滞给药最常见的适应症。与神经特异性阻滞相比,平面阻滞的注射体积更高。无并发症或阻滞失败的报道。结论:本研究描述了急诊医师(EPs)可在急诊科对创伤患者实施的16种不同的UGRA。UGRA可以有效地缓解急诊科创伤患者的疼痛。EPs进行的UGRA为急诊科急性疼痛的治疗提供了一种安全可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信