Quantification of Metabolic Acidosis at Bedside by S.A.L.T Approach.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_1_24
Harshitha Seshadri, Anitha Nileshwar, Shwethapriya Rao, Nisha Sara M Jacob
{"title":"Quantification of Metabolic Acidosis at Bedside by S.A.L.T Approach.","authors":"Harshitha Seshadri, Anitha Nileshwar, Shwethapriya Rao, Nisha Sara M Jacob","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_1_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditionally, metabolic acidosis is analyzed using an anion gap (AG). The aim of the study was to compare the utility of quantitative David Story's simplified Stewart approach against traditional approach to analyze metabolic acidosis. ICU setting. Analytical, cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood gas reports of 50 adult critically ill patients with primary metabolic acidosis at admission were analyzed using both approaches. With traditional approach, acidosis was classified simply as high or normal AG acidosis. With S.A.L.T approach, the components of base deficit were further quantified into sodium chloride, albumin, lactate, and other ions effects. A contribution of sodium chloride or albumin effect of > 30% to the base deficit was considered significant. The proportion of patients with such abnormalities was determined. Descriptive statistics was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of patients was 54.52 ± 19.71 years, 52% were males, and 72% were medical admissions. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 10 (5-13). The mean ± SD pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and albumin were 7.198 ± 0.13, 11.73 ± 4.2 mmol/L, -15.13 ± 5.6 mmol/L, and 2.9 ± 0.77 g%, respectively. The median (IQR) of serum lactate was 6.77 (1.53, 16.32) mmol/L. Hyponatremia and hypochloremia were seen in 68% and 46% of patients, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of patients had acidosis due to other ions, 52% due to lactates. Twenty-eight percent had a significant sodium chloride effect and 32% had significant hypoalbuminemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantification of base deficit of metabolic acidosis using S.A.L.T approach showed changes in sodium chloride levels and hypoalbuminemia affecting base deficit in nearly 30% of the patients. Quantification of metabolic acidosis using S.A.L.T approach is likely to help treat metabolic acidosis more appropriately, with clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 4","pages":"201-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_1_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, metabolic acidosis is analyzed using an anion gap (AG). The aim of the study was to compare the utility of quantitative David Story's simplified Stewart approach against traditional approach to analyze metabolic acidosis. ICU setting. Analytical, cross-sectional observational study.

Methods: Blood gas reports of 50 adult critically ill patients with primary metabolic acidosis at admission were analyzed using both approaches. With traditional approach, acidosis was classified simply as high or normal AG acidosis. With S.A.L.T approach, the components of base deficit were further quantified into sodium chloride, albumin, lactate, and other ions effects. A contribution of sodium chloride or albumin effect of > 30% to the base deficit was considered significant. The proportion of patients with such abnormalities was determined. Descriptive statistics was used.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of patients was 54.52 ± 19.71 years, 52% were males, and 72% were medical admissions. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 10 (5-13). The mean ± SD pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and albumin were 7.198 ± 0.13, 11.73 ± 4.2 mmol/L, -15.13 ± 5.6 mmol/L, and 2.9 ± 0.77 g%, respectively. The median (IQR) of serum lactate was 6.77 (1.53, 16.32) mmol/L. Hyponatremia and hypochloremia were seen in 68% and 46% of patients, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of patients had acidosis due to other ions, 52% due to lactates. Twenty-eight percent had a significant sodium chloride effect and 32% had significant hypoalbuminemia.

Conclusion: Quantification of base deficit of metabolic acidosis using S.A.L.T approach showed changes in sodium chloride levels and hypoalbuminemia affecting base deficit in nearly 30% of the patients. Quantification of metabolic acidosis using S.A.L.T approach is likely to help treat metabolic acidosis more appropriately, with clinical implications.

应用S.A.L.T法定量诊断床边代谢性酸中毒。
传统上,代谢性酸中毒分析使用阴离子间隙(AG)。本研究的目的是比较定量David Story的简化Stewart方法与分析代谢性酸中毒的传统方法的效用。加护病房设置。分析性、横断面观察性研究。方法:对50例成人原发性代谢性酸中毒危重患者入院时的血气报告进行分析。在传统的方法中,酸中毒被简单地划分为高或正常AG酸中毒。采用S.A.L.T方法,将碱亏的成分进一步量化为氯化钠、白蛋白、乳酸盐和其他离子效应。氯化钠或白蛋白效应对碱性亏缺被认为是显著的的贡献为30%。确定出现此类异常的患者比例。采用描述性统计。结果:患者平均±标准差(SD)年龄为54.52±19.71岁,男性占52%,住院患者占72%。序贯器官衰竭评估评分中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为10(5-13)。pH、碳酸氢盐、碱过量和白蛋白的平均±SD分别为7.198±0.13、11.73±4.2 mmol/L、-15.13±5.6 mmol/L和2.9±0.77 g%。血清乳酸中位数(IQR)为6.77 (1.53,16.32)mmol/L。低钠血症和低氯血症分别见于68%和46%的患者。其他离子引起的酸中毒占88%,乳酸盐引起的酸中毒占52%。28%的患者有明显的氯化钠效应,32%的患者有明显的低白蛋白血症。结论:使用S.A.L.T方法量化代谢性酸中毒的碱基缺陷显示,近30%的患者影响碱基缺陷的是氯化钠水平和低白蛋白血症。量化代谢性酸中毒使用S.A.L.T方法可能有助于更适当地治疗代谢性酸中毒,具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信