Non-Linear Dose-Response Relationship for Metformin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of Irregular Longitudinal Data by Interpretable Machine Learning Models.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hayato Akimoto, Takuya Nagashima, Kimino Minagawa, Takashi Hayakawa, Yasuo Takahashi, Satoshi Asai
{"title":"Non-Linear Dose-Response Relationship for Metformin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of Irregular Longitudinal Data by Interpretable Machine Learning Models.","authors":"Hayato Akimoto, Takuya Nagashima, Kimino Minagawa, Takashi Hayakawa, Yasuo Takahashi, Satoshi Asai","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dose-response relationship between metformin and change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) shows a maximum at 1500-2000 mg/day in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the U.S. In Japan, there is little evidence on the HbA1c-lowering effect of high-dose metformin because the maintenance and maximum doses of metformin were raised in 2010. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is saturation of the dose-response relationship for metformin in Japanese T2D patients. Longitudinal clinical information of T2D patients was extracted from electronic medical records. Supervised machine learning models with random effect were constructed to predict change in HbA1c: generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) with/without a feature selection and combining tree-boosting with Gaussian process and mixed-effects models (GPBoost). GPBoost was interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and partial dependence. GPBoost had better predictive performance than GLMM with/without feature selection: root mean square error was 0.602 (95%CI 0.523-0.684), 0.698 (0.629-0.774) and 0.678 (0.609-0.753), respectively. Interpretation of GPBoost by SHAP and partial dependence suggested that the relationship between the daily dose of metformin and change in HbA1c is non-linear rather than linear, and the HbA1c-lowering effect of metformin reaches a maximum at 1500 mg/day. Interpretation of GPBoost, a non-linear supervised machine-learning algorithm, suggests that there is saturation of the dose-response relationship of metformin in Japanese patients with T2D. This finding may be useful for decision-making in pharmacotherapy for T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"13 1","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dose-response relationship between metformin and change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) shows a maximum at 1500-2000 mg/day in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the U.S. In Japan, there is little evidence on the HbA1c-lowering effect of high-dose metformin because the maintenance and maximum doses of metformin were raised in 2010. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is saturation of the dose-response relationship for metformin in Japanese T2D patients. Longitudinal clinical information of T2D patients was extracted from electronic medical records. Supervised machine learning models with random effect were constructed to predict change in HbA1c: generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) with/without a feature selection and combining tree-boosting with Gaussian process and mixed-effects models (GPBoost). GPBoost was interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and partial dependence. GPBoost had better predictive performance than GLMM with/without feature selection: root mean square error was 0.602 (95%CI 0.523-0.684), 0.698 (0.629-0.774) and 0.678 (0.609-0.753), respectively. Interpretation of GPBoost by SHAP and partial dependence suggested that the relationship between the daily dose of metformin and change in HbA1c is non-linear rather than linear, and the HbA1c-lowering effect of metformin reaches a maximum at 1500 mg/day. Interpretation of GPBoost, a non-linear supervised machine-learning algorithm, suggests that there is saturation of the dose-response relationship of metformin in Japanese patients with T2D. This finding may be useful for decision-making in pharmacotherapy for T2D.

二甲双胍在日本2型糖尿病患者中的非线性剂量-反应关系:通过可解释的机器学习模型分析不规则纵向数据
二甲双胍与血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)变化的剂量反应关系显示,在美国2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,在1500-2000 mg/d时达到最大值。在日本,由于2010年二甲双胍维持剂量和最大剂量有所提高,所以关于大剂量二甲双胍降低HbA1c效果的证据很少。本研究的目的是调查二甲双胍在日本T2D患者中是否存在饱和的剂量-反应关系。从电子病历中提取T2D患者的纵向临床信息。构建具有随机效应的监督机器学习模型来预测HbA1c的变化:带/不带特征选择的广义线性混合效应模型(GLMM),结合高斯过程的树增强和混合效应模型(GPBoost)。GPBoost采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)和部分依赖来解释。GPBoost在有/没有特征选择的情况下比GLMM具有更好的预测性能:均方根误差分别为0.602 (95%CI 0.523-0.684)、0.698(0.629-0.774)和0.678(0.609-0.753)。GPBoost的SHAP和部分依赖解释表明,二甲双胍日剂量与HbA1c变化之间的关系是非线性的,而不是线性的,在1500mg /d时,二甲双胍的降HbA1c效果达到最大。GPBoost(一种非线性监督机器学习算法)的解释表明,二甲双胍在日本T2D患者中的剂量-反应关系已经饱和。这一发现可能对T2D药物治疗决策有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信