Quantitative Comparison of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Model-Based Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Shaolong Zhang, Boran Yu, Jiamin Xu, Siyao Jin, Yanming Li, Hao Bing, Jueyu Li, Xiangyu Ma, Xianhua Zhang, Libo Zhao
{"title":"Quantitative Comparison of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Model-Based Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shaolong Zhang, Boran Yu, Jiamin Xu, Siyao Jin, Yanming Li, Hao Bing, Jueyu Li, Xiangyu Ma, Xianhua Zhang, Libo Zhao","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to quantitatively compare the weight loss effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in adult patients with no diabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase have been used as data sources from database inception to January 6, 2024. A total of 137 trials, encompassing 310 treatment arms, 17 GLP-1RAs, and 56,683 patients, were included in the analysis. The included trials were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of the populations: nondiabetic overweight or obesity group (NDOOG), type 2 diabetes Caucasian group (T2DCG), and type 2 diabetes Asian group (T2DAG). The effects of covariates were further evaluated, patients with a higher baseline body weight tend to have better weight loss outcomes, and patients with a higher baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) tend to achieve better blood sugar control. Five mathematical models were subjected to longitudinal analysis. In terms of Δ body weight, retatrutide (12 mg qw) was the most effective treatment (mean difference = -26.56% [95% confidence interval: -43.89% to -3.01%]). Tirzepatide (15 mg qw) demonstrated good weight loss ability in all three ΔBW models, ΔBW-NDOOG (-22.76% [-26.45% to -18.50%]), ΔBW-T2DCG (-11.09% [-12.39% to -9.44%])), and ΔBW-T2DAG (-4.97% [-5.84% to -4.12%]). In the aspect of ΔHbA1c, tirzepatide (10 mg qw) and oral orforglipron (10 mg qd) were the most effective drug, respectively. GLP-1RAs demonstrated effective weight management in both nondiabetic and T2D populations. Retatrutide achieved the most pronounced weight reduction, followed by tirzepatide. GLP-1RAs also significantly improved glycemic control for patients with T2D, with tirzepatide performing the best for glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to quantitatively compare the weight loss effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in adult patients with no diabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase have been used as data sources from database inception to January 6, 2024. A total of 137 trials, encompassing 310 treatment arms, 17 GLP-1RAs, and 56,683 patients, were included in the analysis. The included trials were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of the populations: nondiabetic overweight or obesity group (NDOOG), type 2 diabetes Caucasian group (T2DCG), and type 2 diabetes Asian group (T2DAG). The effects of covariates were further evaluated, patients with a higher baseline body weight tend to have better weight loss outcomes, and patients with a higher baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) tend to achieve better blood sugar control. Five mathematical models were subjected to longitudinal analysis. In terms of Δ body weight, retatrutide (12 mg qw) was the most effective treatment (mean difference = -26.56% [95% confidence interval: -43.89% to -3.01%]). Tirzepatide (15 mg qw) demonstrated good weight loss ability in all three ΔBW models, ΔBW-NDOOG (-22.76% [-26.45% to -18.50%]), ΔBW-T2DCG (-11.09% [-12.39% to -9.44%])), and ΔBW-T2DAG (-4.97% [-5.84% to -4.12%]). In the aspect of ΔHbA1c, tirzepatide (10 mg qw) and oral orforglipron (10 mg qd) were the most effective drug, respectively. GLP-1RAs demonstrated effective weight management in both nondiabetic and T2D populations. Retatrutide achieved the most pronounced weight reduction, followed by tirzepatide. GLP-1RAs also significantly improved glycemic control for patients with T2D, with tirzepatide performing the best for glycemic control.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对成人减肥的定量比较:系统综述和基于模型的荟萃分析。
本研究的目的是定量比较胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)在非糖尿病和2型糖尿病(T2D)成人患者中的减肥效果。从数据库建立到2024年1月6日,PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)和Embase被用作数据源。该分析共纳入137项试验,包括310个治疗组,17个GLP-1RAs和56,683名患者。纳入的试验根据人群特征分为三组:非糖尿病超重或肥胖组(NDOOG)、2型糖尿病高加索组(T2DCG)和2型糖尿病亚洲组(T2DAG)。进一步评估协变量的影响,基线体重较高的患者往往有更好的减肥结果,而基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)较高的患者往往达到更好的血糖控制。对五个数学模型进行了纵向分析。就Δ体重而言,利特鲁肽(12 mg qw)是最有效的治疗方法(平均差值= -26.56%[95%可信区间:-43.89%至-3.01%])。替泽帕肽(15 mg / w)在ΔBW-NDOOG(-22.76%[-26.45%至-18.50%])、ΔBW-T2DCG(-11.09%[-12.39%至-9.44%])和ΔBW-T2DAG(-4.97%[-5.84%至-4.12%])三种ΔBW模型中均表现出良好的减肥能力。在ΔHbA1c方面,替西帕肽(10mg qd)和口服奥利福列酮(10mg qd)分别是最有效的药物。GLP-1RAs在非糖尿病和T2D人群中均显示出有效的体重管理。利特鲁肽的减重效果最为显著,其次是替西帕肽。GLP-1RAs还能显著改善T2D患者的血糖控制,其中替西肽的血糖控制效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信