Post-marketing safety concerns with luspatercept: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jin-Feng Liu, Ying-Tao Bai, Yan-En Leng, En Chang, Yu-Xun Wei, Wei Wei
{"title":"Post-marketing safety concerns with luspatercept: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Jin-Feng Liu, Ying-Tao Bai, Yan-En Leng, En Chang, Yu-Xun Wei, Wei Wei","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Luspatercept, approved for treating beta thalassemia, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated anemia, and MDS with ring sideroblasts or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis associated anemia, has uncertain long-term safety in large populations. This study analyzed adverse events (AEs) linked to luspatercept using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) with data mining techniques.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We collected and analyzed luspatercept-related reports from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was used in data mining to quantify luspatercept-related AE signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 AE signals were detected in 13 SOCs (system organ classes). In addition to the AEs identified during the clinical trial stage, this study also identified some unexpected and important AEs, such as product preparation error, prescribed overdose, product preparation issue, prescribed underdose, and acute hepatitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides a comprehensive description of the post-marketing safety of luspatercept and identifies new potential AEs. Healthcare workers must be vigilant in avoiding product preparation errors, an adverse event that highlights the need for enhanced training and the participation of pharmacists in assessing medication utilization scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Luspatercept, approved for treating beta thalassemia, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated anemia, and MDS with ring sideroblasts or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis associated anemia, has uncertain long-term safety in large populations. This study analyzed adverse events (AEs) linked to luspatercept using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) with data mining techniques.

Research design and methods: We collected and analyzed luspatercept-related reports from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was used in data mining to quantify luspatercept-related AE signals.

Results: A total of 46 AE signals were detected in 13 SOCs (system organ classes). In addition to the AEs identified during the clinical trial stage, this study also identified some unexpected and important AEs, such as product preparation error, prescribed overdose, product preparation issue, prescribed underdose, and acute hepatitis.

Conclusions: Our study provides a comprehensive description of the post-marketing safety of luspatercept and identifies new potential AEs. Healthcare workers must be vigilant in avoiding product preparation errors, an adverse event that highlights the need for enhanced training and the participation of pharmacists in assessing medication utilization scenarios.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信