A real-world pharmacovigilance study of blinatumomab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zheng Zhang, Wenhao Guo, Minghao Chen, Qianzhi Yang, Xia Song, Yuping Wang
{"title":"A real-world pharmacovigilance study of blinatumomab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Zheng Zhang, Wenhao Guo, Minghao Chen, Qianzhi Yang, Xia Song, Yuping Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinatumomab, the first CD3/CD19 bispecific antibody, is FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and children. This study evaluates its safety profile through pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a disproportionality analysis using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Data from 2014Q1 to 2023Q4 were analyzed to identify safety signals related to blinatumomab, along with a stratification analysis to examine AE onset timing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 17,131 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, with 6,266 indicating blinatumomab as the primary suspect. We identified 277 preferred terms (PTs) demonstrating significant disproportionality across all algorithms. Notably, unexpected AEs included Graft Versus Host Disease, myelosuppression, and hypokalaemia. Common AEs were consistent across gender and age groups, predominantly occurring within one month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential AE signals associated with blinatumomab, providing essential insights for its safe clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blinatumomab, the first CD3/CD19 bispecific antibody, is FDA-approved for relapsed or refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and children. This study evaluates its safety profile through pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Method: We conducted a disproportionality analysis using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Data from 2014Q1 to 2023Q4 were analyzed to identify safety signals related to blinatumomab, along with a stratification analysis to examine AE onset timing.

Result: A total of 17,131 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, with 6,266 indicating blinatumomab as the primary suspect. We identified 277 preferred terms (PTs) demonstrating significant disproportionality across all algorithms. Notably, unexpected AEs included Graft Versus Host Disease, myelosuppression, and hypokalaemia. Common AEs were consistent across gender and age groups, predominantly occurring within one month of treatment.

Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance study utilizing the FAERS database identified potential AE signals associated with blinatumomab, providing essential insights for its safe clinical use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信