{"title":"Efficient fermentative production of lactodifucotetraose by controlling sequential glycosyltransferase reactions in Escherichia coli.","authors":"Shu Moriyama, Tomotoshi Sugita, Makoto Yamashita","doi":"10.1002/btpr.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lactodifucotetraose (LDFT) is a human milk oligosaccharide (HMO) that might reduce inflammation in infants. In this study, we established a useful production process of LDFT by engineering two key enzymes, α1,2-fucosyltransferase (α1,2-FucT) and α1,3-fucosyltransferase (α1,3-FucT). First, we verified which of 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) or 3-fucosyllactose (3-FL) (mostly unverified) was more useful. We searched for FucTs that functioned efficiently in vivo against the raw material lactose or the two intermediates 2'-FL or 3-FL by external substrate addition to culture medium. We found that α1,2- FucT (HMFT) from Helicobacter mustelae and the N-terminal truncated form of α1,3-FucT from Bacteroides fragilis (BfFucTΔN10) had high potential. 3-FL was not efficiently converted to LDFT, which might be attributed to the low reactivity of HMFT to 3-FL as well as the low uptake efficiency of 3-FL by LacY, as revealed by a growth test with exogenously added FL as the sole carbon source and heterologously expressed intracellular fucosidase. Furthermore, because 3-FL accumulation had a negative impact on cell growth, we avoided the route passing through 3-FL. By adjusting the copy numbers of HMFT and BffucTΔN10, we produced LDFT from lactose predominantly via 2'-FL. Finally, 17.5 g/L of LDFT (with 6.8 g/L 2'-FL and no 3-FL or residual lactose) accumulated in a 3-L fed-batch culture after 77 h. This study reports the detailed analysis of multiple pathways and shows the control of glycosyltransferases can improve the production efficiency of complex HMOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":" ","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lactodifucotetraose (LDFT) is a human milk oligosaccharide (HMO) that might reduce inflammation in infants. In this study, we established a useful production process of LDFT by engineering two key enzymes, α1,2-fucosyltransferase (α1,2-FucT) and α1,3-fucosyltransferase (α1,3-FucT). First, we verified which of 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) or 3-fucosyllactose (3-FL) (mostly unverified) was more useful. We searched for FucTs that functioned efficiently in vivo against the raw material lactose or the two intermediates 2'-FL or 3-FL by external substrate addition to culture medium. We found that α1,2- FucT (HMFT) from Helicobacter mustelae and the N-terminal truncated form of α1,3-FucT from Bacteroides fragilis (BfFucTΔN10) had high potential. 3-FL was not efficiently converted to LDFT, which might be attributed to the low reactivity of HMFT to 3-FL as well as the low uptake efficiency of 3-FL by LacY, as revealed by a growth test with exogenously added FL as the sole carbon source and heterologously expressed intracellular fucosidase. Furthermore, because 3-FL accumulation had a negative impact on cell growth, we avoided the route passing through 3-FL. By adjusting the copy numbers of HMFT and BffucTΔN10, we produced LDFT from lactose predominantly via 2'-FL. Finally, 17.5 g/L of LDFT (with 6.8 g/L 2'-FL and no 3-FL or residual lactose) accumulated in a 3-L fed-batch culture after 77 h. This study reports the detailed analysis of multiple pathways and shows the control of glycosyltransferases can improve the production efficiency of complex HMOs.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.