Diaphragmatic Injuries in Patients with Penetrating Thoracoabdominal Injuries without Shock or Acute Abdomen at Admission.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_33_24
Alejandro González-Muñoz, Laura Otálora González, María Paula Fontecha Pinzón, Angela Cristina Ríos Cadavid, Cristina Judith Padilla Herrera, Danny Michell Conde Monroy, José Gabriel Rodríguez-Narváez, David Rene Rodriguez Lima
{"title":"Diaphragmatic Injuries in Patients with Penetrating Thoracoabdominal Injuries without Shock or Acute Abdomen at Admission.","authors":"Alejandro González-Muñoz, Laura Otálora González, María Paula Fontecha Pinzón, Angela Cristina Ríos Cadavid, Cristina Judith Padilla Herrera, Danny Michell Conde Monroy, José Gabriel Rodríguez-Narváez, David Rene Rodriguez Lima","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_33_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries (PTAIs) are associated with diaphragmatic injuries and subsequent complications. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries in patients with PTAI without signs of shock or acute abdomen at admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, single-centered study was conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. The study included all patients with PTAI who underwent surgical exploration and were admitted without signs of shock or acute abdomen, between January 2019 and August 2021. Indications for surgical exploration included presence of left thoracoabdominal wound, hemo- or pneumothorax in presurgical imaging, abdominal pain, hypotension, or anemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 29 years (interquartile range: 22-33), with 269 (94.7%) patients being males. Out of these, 268 (94.3%) patients experienced stabbing as the mechanism of injury. The prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries diagnosed during surgical exploration was 15.1% (43 patients). There were 183 patients with left-sided PTAI and 115 patients with right-sided PTAI. The prevalence of the right diaphragmatic injury was 25.2% (29 patients), while for left diaphragmatic injury, it was 8.1% (15 patients). Only one patient presented with bilateral diaphragmatic injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries in patients with PTAI, without signs of shock or acute abdomen upon admission, was 15.1%. However, the prevalence was 25.2% in the right PTAI and 8.1% in the left PTAI. These findings suggest that surgical exploration of the diaphragm in cases of PTAI should be performed regardless of the side of the wound.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 4","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_33_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries (PTAIs) are associated with diaphragmatic injuries and subsequent complications. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries in patients with PTAI without signs of shock or acute abdomen at admission.

Methods: A cross-sectional, single-centered study was conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. The study included all patients with PTAI who underwent surgical exploration and were admitted without signs of shock or acute abdomen, between January 2019 and August 2021. Indications for surgical exploration included presence of left thoracoabdominal wound, hemo- or pneumothorax in presurgical imaging, abdominal pain, hypotension, or anemia.

Results: A total of 284 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 29 years (interquartile range: 22-33), with 269 (94.7%) patients being males. Out of these, 268 (94.3%) patients experienced stabbing as the mechanism of injury. The prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries diagnosed during surgical exploration was 15.1% (43 patients). There were 183 patients with left-sided PTAI and 115 patients with right-sided PTAI. The prevalence of the right diaphragmatic injury was 25.2% (29 patients), while for left diaphragmatic injury, it was 8.1% (15 patients). Only one patient presented with bilateral diaphragmatic injury.

Conclusions: The prevalence of diaphragmatic injuries in patients with PTAI, without signs of shock or acute abdomen upon admission, was 15.1%. However, the prevalence was 25.2% in the right PTAI and 8.1% in the left PTAI. These findings suggest that surgical exploration of the diaphragm in cases of PTAI should be performed regardless of the side of the wound.

入院时无休克或急腹症的穿透性胸腹损伤患者的膈肌损伤。
简介:穿透性胸腹损伤(PTAIs)与膈肌损伤及其并发症有关。本研究旨在描述住院时无休克或急腹症症状的PTAI患者膈肌损伤的发生率。方法:在哥伦比亚波哥大进行了一项横断面、单中心研究。该研究包括2019年1月至2021年8月期间接受手术探查并入院无休克或急腹症迹象的所有PTAI患者。手术探查指征包括左胸腹伤口、术前显像有出血或气胸、腹痛、低血压或贫血。结果:284例患者纳入最终分析。中位年龄为29岁(四分位数范围:22-33岁),男性269例(94.7%)。其中,268例(94.3%)患者的伤害机制是刺伤。43例(15.1%)在手术探查中诊断出膈肌损伤。左侧PTAI 183例,右侧PTAI 115例。右侧膈肌损伤发生率为25.2%(29例),左侧膈肌损伤发生率为8.1%(15例)。仅有1例患者表现为双侧膈肌损伤。结论:住院时无休克或急腹症症状的PTAI患者膈肌损伤发生率为15.1%。而右侧PTAI患病率为25.2%,左侧PTAI患病率为8.1%。这些结果表明,在PTAI病例中,手术探查膈肌应不考虑伤口的一侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信