Estimating measured creatinine clearance for critically ill trauma patients with presumed normal kidney function.

Abstract

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: The intent of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of two common methods for estimating kidney function in critically ill trauma patients with presumed normal kidney function.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2 common methods for estimating kidney function, the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (2021 CKD-EPI) equations, was undertaken for adult trauma patients. Patients with a 24-hour urine collection for determination of measured creatinine clearance (mCrCl) within 4 to 14 days after admission were included in the study. Patients with a serum creatinine concentration of >1.5 mg/dL or who required dialysis were excluded.

Results: The 200 patients included in the study had a median (IQR) mCrCl of 184 (141-233) mL/min; both the CG and CKD-EPI equations were biased towards underpredicting mCrCl, with median (IQR) values of 135 (100-177) mL/min and 135 (113-155) mL/min, respectively (P < 0.001). One hundred twenty-two patients had augmented renal clearance (ARC), defined as an mCrCl of >129 mL/min/1.73m2, and those patients had a median (IQR) mCrCl of 216 (188-265) mL/min; both the CG and CKD-EPI equations were biased towards underpredicting mCrCl in patients with ARC: the median (IQR) estimates were 160 (126-197) mL/min and 147 (129-164) mL/min, respectively (P < 0.001). For those without ARC (n = 78), the median (IQR) mCrCl was 125 (98-153) mL/min; both the CG and CKD-EPI equations underpredicted mCrCl, with median estimates of 98 (76-116) mL/min and 112 (92-132) mL/min, respectively (P < 0.001). The CKD-EPI equation outperformed the CG method for all markers of precision in patients without ARC (P < 0.003).

Conclusion: Common predictive equations for assessing kidney function in critically ill patients with traumatic injuries underpredicted mCrCl, especially in those with ARC.