A New Method for Comprehensive Analysis of Benzodiazepine, Opioid, and Propofol Interactions and Dose Selection Rationales in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jing-Yang Liou, Hsin-Yi Wang, I-Ting Kuo, Mei-Yung Tsou, Weng-Kuei Chang, Chien-Kun Ting
{"title":"A New Method for Comprehensive Analysis of Benzodiazepine, Opioid, and Propofol Interactions and Dose Selection Rationales in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation.","authors":"Jing-Yang Liou, Hsin-Yi Wang, I-Ting Kuo, Mei-Yung Tsou, Weng-Kuei Chang, Chien-Kun Ting","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore a new method for determining optimal dosing regimens for combinations of propofol, midazolam, and an opioid to achieve rapid on- and off-set of deep sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We simulated 16 published dosing regimens using a well-validated pharmacodynamic model. The study was divided into 2 parts. First, the regimen that best provided deep sedation and rapid recovery was selected. A deep sedation-time area-under-the-curve (AUC) method was used to compare published dosing regimens; a higher AUC indicated better sedation and faster recovery. Second, subgroup analysis of the best-performing dosing regimen was undertaken better to understand how each drug affected patient recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUC method identified a combination of midazolam 1 mg, alfentanil 500 µg, and propofol target infusion effect-site concentration (Ce) 2 µg mL -1 as the optimal regimen ( P < .01). Propofol correlated with high probability of sedation and increased AUC (R 2 = 0.53), whereas midazolam had a significant impact on time to return of consciousness (R 2 = 0.86). Subgroup analysis indicated that regimens consisting of a fixed dose of alfentanil and either 5 µg mL -1 Ce propofol, or 1 mg midazolam with 3-5 µg mL -1 Ce of propofol, or 2 mg midazolam with 2 µg mL -1 Ce propofol provided adequate sedation and rapid recovery. Midazolam >3 mg greatly prolonged recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study used a clinically relevant method and model simulation to determine suitable sedation regimens for use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. A balanced propofol, midazolam, and an opioid should be used. The AUC method was capable of providing objective assessments for model selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"1168-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore a new method for determining optimal dosing regimens for combinations of propofol, midazolam, and an opioid to achieve rapid on- and off-set of deep sedation.

Methods: We simulated 16 published dosing regimens using a well-validated pharmacodynamic model. The study was divided into 2 parts. First, the regimen that best provided deep sedation and rapid recovery was selected. A deep sedation-time area-under-the-curve (AUC) method was used to compare published dosing regimens; a higher AUC indicated better sedation and faster recovery. Second, subgroup analysis of the best-performing dosing regimen was undertaken better to understand how each drug affected patient recovery.

Results: The AUC method identified a combination of midazolam 1 mg, alfentanil 500 µg, and propofol target infusion effect-site concentration (Ce) 2 µg mL -1 as the optimal regimen ( P < .01). Propofol correlated with high probability of sedation and increased AUC (R 2 = 0.53), whereas midazolam had a significant impact on time to return of consciousness (R 2 = 0.86). Subgroup analysis indicated that regimens consisting of a fixed dose of alfentanil and either 5 µg mL -1 Ce propofol, or 1 mg midazolam with 3-5 µg mL -1 Ce of propofol, or 2 mg midazolam with 2 µg mL -1 Ce propofol provided adequate sedation and rapid recovery. Midazolam >3 mg greatly prolonged recovery.

Conclusions: This study used a clinically relevant method and model simulation to determine suitable sedation regimens for use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. A balanced propofol, midazolam, and an opioid should be used. The AUC method was capable of providing objective assessments for model selection.

一种综合分析苯二氮卓类药物、阿片类药物和异丙酚在胃肠道内镜镇静中的相互作用和剂量选择的新方法。
背景:本研究的目的是探索一种确定异丙酚、咪达唑仑和阿片类药物联合使用的最佳给药方案的新方法,以实现深度镇静的快速开启和抵消。方法:我们使用一个经过验证的药效学模型模拟了16种已发表的给药方案。研究分为两部分。首先,选择最能提供深度镇静和快速恢复的方案。采用深度镇静时间曲线下面积(AUC)方法比较已发表的给药方案;AUC越高,镇静效果越好,恢复越快。其次,对最佳给药方案进行亚组分析,以更好地了解每种药物对患者康复的影响。结果:AUC法确定咪达唑仑1 mg、阿芬太尼500µg、异丙酚靶注效位浓度(Ce) 2µg mL-1为最佳方案(P < 0.01)。异丙酚与镇静高概率和AUC增加相关(R2 = 0.53),而咪达唑仑对意识恢复时间有显著影响(R2 = 0.86)。亚组分析表明,固定剂量的阿芬太尼和5µg mL-1 Ce异丙酚,或1mg咪达唑仑和3-5µg mL-1 Ce异丙酚,或2mg咪达唑仑和2µg mL-1 Ce异丙酚组成的方案可以提供足够的镇静和快速恢复。咪达唑仑bbb30 3毫克,大大延长恢复时间。结论:本研究采用与临床相关的方法和模型模拟来确定胃肠道内窥镜检查中合适的镇静方案。应使用平衡的异丙酚、咪达唑仑和阿片类药物。AUC方法能够为模型选择提供客观评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信