Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites Using Environmental DNA (eDNA).

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Qiaoyun Ai, Hao Yuan, Ying Wang, Chenhong Li
{"title":"Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites Using Environmental DNA (eDNA).","authors":"Qiaoyun Ai, Hao Yuan, Ying Wang, Chenhong Li","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.14076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advance of environmental DNA (eDNA) has enabled rapid and non-invasive species detection in aquatic environments. While most studies focus on species detection, recent works explored using eDNA concentration to quantify species abundance. However, the differential individual DNA contribution to eDNA samples could easily obscure the eDNA concentration-species abundance relationship. We propose using the number of segregating sites as a proxy for estimating species abundance. Segregating sites reflect the genetic diversity of the population, which is less sensitive to differential individual DNA contribution than eDNA concentration. We examined the relationship between the number of segregating sites and species abundance in silico, in vitro, and in situ experiments, using two brackish goby species, Acanthogobius hasta and Tridentiger bifasciatus. Analyses of the simulated and in vitro data with DNA mixed from a known number of individuals showed a strong correlation between the number of segregating sites and species abundance (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.9; p < 0.01). In the in situ experiments, we analysed eDNA samples collected from mesocosm. The results further validated that the correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70, p < 0.01) was not affected by biotic factors, including body size and feeding behaviour (p > 0.05). The cross-validation test results also showed that the number of segregating sites predicted species abundance with less bias and variability than the eDNA concentration. Overall, the number of segregating sites is less affected by differential DNA contribution among individuals compared to eDNA concentration. This advancement can significantly enhance the proficiency of estimating species abundance using eDNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":" ","pages":"e14076"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.14076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advance of environmental DNA (eDNA) has enabled rapid and non-invasive species detection in aquatic environments. While most studies focus on species detection, recent works explored using eDNA concentration to quantify species abundance. However, the differential individual DNA contribution to eDNA samples could easily obscure the eDNA concentration-species abundance relationship. We propose using the number of segregating sites as a proxy for estimating species abundance. Segregating sites reflect the genetic diversity of the population, which is less sensitive to differential individual DNA contribution than eDNA concentration. We examined the relationship between the number of segregating sites and species abundance in silico, in vitro, and in situ experiments, using two brackish goby species, Acanthogobius hasta and Tridentiger bifasciatus. Analyses of the simulated and in vitro data with DNA mixed from a known number of individuals showed a strong correlation between the number of segregating sites and species abundance (R2 > 0.9; p < 0.01). In the in situ experiments, we analysed eDNA samples collected from mesocosm. The results further validated that the correlation (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.01) was not affected by biotic factors, including body size and feeding behaviour (p > 0.05). The cross-validation test results also showed that the number of segregating sites predicted species abundance with less bias and variability than the eDNA concentration. Overall, the number of segregating sites is less affected by differential DNA contribution among individuals compared to eDNA concentration. This advancement can significantly enhance the proficiency of estimating species abundance using eDNA.

基于环境DNA (eDNA)分离位点数量的物种丰度估算
环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)技术的进步使水生环境中物种的快速、非侵入性检测成为可能。虽然大多数研究都集中在物种检测上,但最近的工作探索了使用eDNA浓度来量化物种丰度。然而,不同的个体DNA对eDNA样品的贡献很容易模糊eDNA浓度与物种丰度的关系。我们建议使用分离点的数量作为估计物种丰度的代理。分离位点反映了群体的遗传多样性,这对不同个体DNA贡献的敏感性低于eDNA浓度。本文以Acanthogobius hasta和Tridentiger bifasciatus两种半咸水虾虎鱼为研究对象,通过室内实验、体外实验和原位实验研究了分离位点数量与物种丰度之间的关系。对已知数量的个体混合DNA的模拟和体外数据分析表明,分离位点数量与物种丰度之间存在很强的相关性(R2 > 0.9;P 2 = 0.70, P 0.05)。交叉验证试验结果还表明,与eDNA浓度相比,分离位点数量预测物种丰度的偏差和变异性较小。总的来说,与eDNA浓度相比,个体间DNA贡献差异对分离位点数量的影响较小。这一进展可以显著提高利用eDNA估算物种丰度的熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信