Got your six? Veterans and the family court system

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Roger Hill, Erhan Bedestani
{"title":"Got your six? Veterans and the family court system","authors":"Roger Hill,&nbsp;Erhan Bedestani","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Status as a Veteran or military Servicemember (SM) can negatively impact custody determination in family court. Veterans and Servicemembers (SMs) must contend with unique barriers. The first barrier is a dueling media narrative of extremes, in which they are both idolized and demonized, extremes that shape the view that much of American society takes with respect to Veterans and SMs. The second barrier is the Permanent Change of Station (PCS) system. PCS forces SMs to move frequently and they have no formal mechanism to decline a PCS in order to maintain an existing child custody arrangement. The third barrier is an alarmingly high and incorrect over-association of military service and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) coupled with the incorrect assertion that PTSD manifests itself primarily in a violent manner. The fourth barrier is a unique administrative hearing process within each of the military services known as the Family Advocacy Program (FAP) Incident Determination Committee (IDC) / Case Review Committee (CRC) which reviews claims of spousal or child abuse and is empowered to substantiate abuse claims without affording procedural due process protections. This paper is important because informing the body of professionals who comprise family court matters about these barriers will ideally lead to improved child custody outcomes for Veterans and SMs as well as push for additional research into the subject to understand how and in what manner SMs and Veterans are negatively impacted in custody determinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"105-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Status as a Veteran or military Servicemember (SM) can negatively impact custody determination in family court. Veterans and Servicemembers (SMs) must contend with unique barriers. The first barrier is a dueling media narrative of extremes, in which they are both idolized and demonized, extremes that shape the view that much of American society takes with respect to Veterans and SMs. The second barrier is the Permanent Change of Station (PCS) system. PCS forces SMs to move frequently and they have no formal mechanism to decline a PCS in order to maintain an existing child custody arrangement. The third barrier is an alarmingly high and incorrect over-association of military service and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) coupled with the incorrect assertion that PTSD manifests itself primarily in a violent manner. The fourth barrier is a unique administrative hearing process within each of the military services known as the Family Advocacy Program (FAP) Incident Determination Committee (IDC) / Case Review Committee (CRC) which reviews claims of spousal or child abuse and is empowered to substantiate abuse claims without affording procedural due process protections. This paper is important because informing the body of professionals who comprise family court matters about these barriers will ideally lead to improved child custody outcomes for Veterans and SMs as well as push for additional research into the subject to understand how and in what manner SMs and Veterans are negatively impacted in custody determinations.

你的六点钟到了吗?退伍军人和家庭法庭系统
作为退伍军人或军人(SM)的身份会对家庭法院的监护权决定产生负面影响。退伍军人和服役人员(SMs)必须应对独特的障碍。第一个障碍是媒体对极端事件的激烈叙述,他们既被偶像化又被妖魔化,这些极端事件塑造了美国社会对退伍军人和短信的看法。第二个障碍是永久换站(PCS)系统。PCS迫使SMs频繁移动,他们没有正式的机制来拒绝PCS以维持现有的儿童监护安排。第三个障碍是把服兵役和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)联系在一起,这种联系高得惊人,而且是错误的,而且认为PTSD主要表现为暴力行为。第四个障碍是每个军种都有一个独特的行政听证程序,即家庭倡导计划(FAP)事件确定委员会(IDC) /案件审查委员会(CRC),该委员会审查虐待配偶或儿童的索赔,并有权证实虐待索赔,而无需提供程序正当程序保护。这篇论文很重要,因为告知组成家庭法庭事务的专业人员这些障碍将理想地改善退伍军人和退伍军人的子女监护结果,并推动对该主题的进一步研究,以了解如何以及以何种方式对退伍军人和退伍军人在监护决定中产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信