Credentialing care: COVID-19 and the bureaucratization of doulas

IF 2.2
Ellen Block, Julie Johnson Searcy, Angela N. Castañeda
{"title":"Credentialing care: COVID-19 and the bureaucratization of doulas","authors":"Ellen Block,&nbsp;Julie Johnson Searcy,&nbsp;Angela N. Castañeda","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Doulas in the United States offer embodied, informational, and continuous one-on-one care to birthing people. Doulas have historically sought certification to gain knowledge through training and to gain legitimacy for healthcare providers and clients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals required doulas to provide proof of certification. The COVID-19 pandemic, and the proliferation of state-sponsored doula programs, has sparked a shift in how doulas are viewed and regulated, enabling new forms of bureaucratic oversight and control. Based on participant observation, surveys, and semi-structured interviews, we examine the connection between certification and care including motivations doulas have for certification, the perceived value of certification, certification as a form of gatekeeping, and increased bureaucratization of doulas. Using a critical feminist approach, we argue that increased bureaucratization and surveillance of doulas has not improved standards of care or led to more equitable access. Indeed, doulas provide a window into the negative impact of bureaucratization on care. While some of these negative impacts are byproducts of policies intended to increase oversight and access to doula care, we argue that increased bureaucratization and surveillance of doulas is also intended to act as a gatekeeping mechanism demonstrating how policies contribute to uneven reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"5 2","pages":"311-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.12150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ftr/10.1002/fea2.12150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doulas in the United States offer embodied, informational, and continuous one-on-one care to birthing people. Doulas have historically sought certification to gain knowledge through training and to gain legitimacy for healthcare providers and clients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals required doulas to provide proof of certification. The COVID-19 pandemic, and the proliferation of state-sponsored doula programs, has sparked a shift in how doulas are viewed and regulated, enabling new forms of bureaucratic oversight and control. Based on participant observation, surveys, and semi-structured interviews, we examine the connection between certification and care including motivations doulas have for certification, the perceived value of certification, certification as a form of gatekeeping, and increased bureaucratization of doulas. Using a critical feminist approach, we argue that increased bureaucratization and surveillance of doulas has not improved standards of care or led to more equitable access. Indeed, doulas provide a window into the negative impact of bureaucratization on care. While some of these negative impacts are byproducts of policies intended to increase oversight and access to doula care, we argue that increased bureaucratization and surveillance of doulas is also intended to act as a gatekeeping mechanism demonstrating how policies contribute to uneven reproduction.

Abstract Image

认证护理:COVID-19和助产师的官僚化
美国的助产师为产妇提供具体的、信息丰富的、持续的一对一护理。从历史上看,助产师一直在寻求认证,以通过培训获得知识,并为医疗保健提供者和客户获得合法性。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,医院要求助产师提供认证证明。2019冠状病毒病大流行以及国家赞助的助产师项目的激增,引发了对助产师的看法和监管方式的转变,催生了新的官僚监督和控制形式。基于参与者观察、调查和半结构化访谈,我们研究了认证与护理之间的联系,包括导乐获得认证的动机、认证的感知价值、认证作为一种守门人的形式,以及导乐日益增加的官僚化。使用批判的女权主义方法,我们认为增加的官僚化和对助产师的监督并没有提高护理标准或导致更公平的机会。事实上,助产师提供了一个窗口,让我们了解到官僚化对护理的负面影响。虽然这些负面影响中的一些是旨在加强对助产师护理的监督和获取的政策的副产品,但我们认为,对助产师的日益官僚化和监督也旨在作为一种把关机制,表明政策如何导致生育不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信