Navigating Adoption by Global South Users: The Case of Wikimedia Volunteers: Why It Is Important for Global Organizations to Accommodate Inclusive Research Teams

CAMILLE KRAMER-COURBARIAUX, SASHA E.N.A OFORI, KALAMA HAFISOU
{"title":"Navigating Adoption by Global South Users: The Case of Wikimedia Volunteers: Why It Is Important for Global Organizations to Accommodate Inclusive Research Teams","authors":"CAMILLE KRAMER-COURBARIAUX,&nbsp;SASHA E.N.A OFORI,&nbsp;KALAMA HAFISOU","doi":"10.1111/epic.12149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This case study explores the impact YUX, a pan-African UX research and design agency, had on the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) work with volunteer communities in Africa. After an overview of WMF's motivation for focusing on the Global South and a description of the teams and the research methodology, it focuses on the insights that changed how WMF supports its organizer community, and how differences in positionality sparked debate. Key insights include developing non-digital solutions, acknowledging that African participants leverage their volunteer work for personal growth, and addressing the uneven perception of Wikipedia as a neutral source of information.</p>\n <p>Constructive debate arose because the WMF team had little knowledge of Africa, which obliged the African researchers to be comparative-cultural experts and ethical champions. Although the emic perspective had been sought after, ultimately the more complex solutions the research recommended, such as enabling organizers to collect phone numbers, were not prioritized. Other recommendations were followed through on and the research led WMF to launch a community-support group dedicated to African Wikipedia volunteers, and contributed to leveling up how WMF supports its volunteer community globally.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89347,"journal":{"name":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","volume":"2023 1","pages":"12-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epic.12149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epic.12149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study explores the impact YUX, a pan-African UX research and design agency, had on the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) work with volunteer communities in Africa. After an overview of WMF's motivation for focusing on the Global South and a description of the teams and the research methodology, it focuses on the insights that changed how WMF supports its organizer community, and how differences in positionality sparked debate. Key insights include developing non-digital solutions, acknowledging that African participants leverage their volunteer work for personal growth, and addressing the uneven perception of Wikipedia as a neutral source of information.

Constructive debate arose because the WMF team had little knowledge of Africa, which obliged the African researchers to be comparative-cultural experts and ethical champions. Although the emic perspective had been sought after, ultimately the more complex solutions the research recommended, such as enabling organizers to collect phone numbers, were not prioritized. Other recommendations were followed through on and the research led WMF to launch a community-support group dedicated to African Wikipedia volunteers, and contributed to leveling up how WMF supports its volunteer community globally.

引导全球南方用户的采用:维基媒体志愿者的案例:为什么全球组织容纳包容性研究团队很重要
这个案例研究探讨了泛非洲用户体验研究和设计机构YUX对维基媒体基金会(WMF)在非洲志愿者社区的工作的影响。在概述了WMF关注全球南方的动机、团队和研究方法之后,本文将重点介绍WMF如何支持其组织者社区的见解,以及立场的差异如何引发辩论。关键的见解包括开发非数字解决方案,承认非洲参与者利用他们的志愿者工作促进个人成长,以及解决对维基百科作为中立信息来源的不平等看法。由于WMF团队对非洲知之甚少,这迫使非洲研究人员成为比较文化专家和道德捍卫者,因此引发了建设性的辩论。虽然主体性的观点一直受到追捧,但最终研究建议的更复杂的解决方案,如使组织者能够收集电话号码,并没有得到优先考虑。其他建议得到了贯彻,这项研究促使WMF成立了一个致力于非洲维基百科志愿者的社区支持小组,并为WMF在全球范围内支持其志愿者社区的方式做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信