Grounded Models: The Future of Sensemaking in a World of Generative AI

TOM HOY, IMAN MUNIRE BILAL, ZOE LIOU
{"title":"Grounded Models: The Future of Sensemaking in a World of Generative AI","authors":"TOM HOY,&nbsp;IMAN MUNIRE BILAL,&nbsp;ZOE LIOU","doi":"10.1111/epic.12158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The promise of generative AI technologies is seductive to product leaders: frictionless research in which synthetic data can be both generated and analysed via a simple end-to-end UI, enabling teams to speed up research timelines and reduce costs. However, our evidence suggests we should be sceptical of these maximalist claims. Over the last 18 months our combined team of NLP data scientists and ethnographers has conducted a series of experiments to explore, assess and define the value of LLM-driven research techniques. First, we explore this value pragmatically, as new tools for sensemaking; and second, epistemologically, as we unpack their broader implications for ethnography. We demonstrate how ethnography can usefully “ground” LLMs in two “complex” worlds: that of the user and that of the organisation. We argue the future of research is not automation, but more collaboration between ethnographers and data scientists, as they better integrate their tools and ways of knowing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89347,"journal":{"name":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","volume":"2023 1","pages":"159-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epic.12158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference proceedings. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epic.12158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The promise of generative AI technologies is seductive to product leaders: frictionless research in which synthetic data can be both generated and analysed via a simple end-to-end UI, enabling teams to speed up research timelines and reduce costs. However, our evidence suggests we should be sceptical of these maximalist claims. Over the last 18 months our combined team of NLP data scientists and ethnographers has conducted a series of experiments to explore, assess and define the value of LLM-driven research techniques. First, we explore this value pragmatically, as new tools for sensemaking; and second, epistemologically, as we unpack their broader implications for ethnography. We demonstrate how ethnography can usefully “ground” LLMs in two “complex” worlds: that of the user and that of the organisation. We argue the future of research is not automation, but more collaboration between ethnographers and data scientists, as they better integrate their tools and ways of knowing.

基于模型:生成式人工智能世界中语义的未来
生成式人工智能技术的前景对产品领导者来说很有吸引力:在无摩擦的研究中,合成数据可以通过简单的端到端UI生成和分析,使团队能够加快研究进度并降低成本。然而,我们的证据表明,我们应该对这些最大化主义者的说法持怀疑态度。在过去的18个月里,我们由NLP数据科学家和民族志学家组成的联合团队进行了一系列实验,以探索、评估和定义法学硕士驱动的研究技术的价值。首先,我们从实用主义的角度探索这一价值,将其作为语义构建的新工具;其次,在认识论上,当我们解开它们对民族志更广泛的影响时。我们展示了民族志如何在两个“复杂”的世界中有效地“接地”法学硕士:用户的世界和组织的世界。我们认为研究的未来不是自动化,而是人种学家和数据科学家之间的更多合作,因为他们更好地整合了他们的工具和了解方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信