On Certainty, Proper Confidence, and Doubt: A Postfoundationalist and Critical Realist Epistemology for Doing Constructive Theology

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen
{"title":"On Certainty, Proper Confidence, and Doubt: A Postfoundationalist and Critical Realist Epistemology for Doing Constructive Theology","authors":"Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen","doi":"10.1111/dial.12871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The present essay<sup>1</sup> seeks to focus on the meaning and challenges of <i>doubt</i> and <i>lack of certainty</i> in the context of doing academic theological work, whether in a Seminary setting such as my own, Fuller Theological Seminary, or in a “secular” university setting such as the University of Helsinki, my other institution. Throughout, I am raising questions such as whether any kind of certainty or confidence is available in the work of theology, particularly constructive theology, my own particular area of interest. Speaking of constructive theology, reflecting on the issues of doubt, certainty, and confidence is particularly important for the simple reason that it typically engages some non-theological disciplines such as natural sciences with their own criteria for truth. And in my case, dialogue with some other faith traditions, including Islam, further makes the issue of doubt pertinent. To make my inquiry manageable—and hopefully also dynamic—I am carrying critical conversation with two thinkers of the 20th century, namely the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein and the missionary bishop and cultural critic of the West, Lesslie Newbigin. Whereas the mature Wittgenstein was in search of certainty towards the end of his life, Newbigin sought for proper confidence. Both of them rejected the Cartesian indubitable certainty of modernity, on the one hand, and the dismissal of the possibility of truth in many streams of late modernity on the other. While critically affirming some key arguments of these two diverse thinkers, I also see the importance of buttressing their emerging epistemological programs with the help of insights from postfoundationalist and critical–realist epistemologies. It is clear without saying that this big task can only be outlined and sketched rather than scrutinized in any detail within a 1-h talk! My presentation is more an invitation to conversation and less any kind of finished project. I will first engage the two protagonists. Thereafter, before the summative and concluding reflections in terms of implications to theology and faith, a brief look at the meaning and nature of postfoundationalism and critical realism is attempted.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":42769,"journal":{"name":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","volume":"63 3","pages":"131-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog-A Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dial.12871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present essay1 seeks to focus on the meaning and challenges of doubt and lack of certainty in the context of doing academic theological work, whether in a Seminary setting such as my own, Fuller Theological Seminary, or in a “secular” university setting such as the University of Helsinki, my other institution. Throughout, I am raising questions such as whether any kind of certainty or confidence is available in the work of theology, particularly constructive theology, my own particular area of interest. Speaking of constructive theology, reflecting on the issues of doubt, certainty, and confidence is particularly important for the simple reason that it typically engages some non-theological disciplines such as natural sciences with their own criteria for truth. And in my case, dialogue with some other faith traditions, including Islam, further makes the issue of doubt pertinent. To make my inquiry manageable—and hopefully also dynamic—I am carrying critical conversation with two thinkers of the 20th century, namely the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein and the missionary bishop and cultural critic of the West, Lesslie Newbigin. Whereas the mature Wittgenstein was in search of certainty towards the end of his life, Newbigin sought for proper confidence. Both of them rejected the Cartesian indubitable certainty of modernity, on the one hand, and the dismissal of the possibility of truth in many streams of late modernity on the other. While critically affirming some key arguments of these two diverse thinkers, I also see the importance of buttressing their emerging epistemological programs with the help of insights from postfoundationalist and critical–realist epistemologies. It is clear without saying that this big task can only be outlined and sketched rather than scrutinized in any detail within a 1-h talk! My presentation is more an invitation to conversation and less any kind of finished project. I will first engage the two protagonists. Thereafter, before the summative and concluding reflections in terms of implications to theology and faith, a brief look at the meaning and nature of postfoundationalism and critical realism is attempted.

论确定性、适当信心与怀疑:建构神学的后基础主义与批判现实主义认识论
本文试图关注在神学学术工作的背景下,怀疑和缺乏确定性的意义和挑战,无论是在神学院的环境中,如我自己的富勒神学院,还是在“世俗”的大学环境中,如赫尔辛基大学,我的另一个机构。在整个过程中,我提出的问题是,在神学工作中,特别是在我自己感兴趣的建设性神学领域,是否存在某种确定性或信心。说到建构性神学,反思怀疑、确定和信心的问题特别重要,原因很简单,因为它通常涉及一些非神学学科,如自然科学,它们有自己的真理标准。就我而言,与包括伊斯兰教在内的其他一些信仰传统进行对话,进一步使怀疑问题变得切合实际。为了使我的调查易于管理——希望也是动态的——我与20世纪的两位思想家进行了批判性的对话,他们分别是哲学家路德维希·维特根斯坦和西方传教士主教和文化评论家莱斯利·纽比金。成熟的维特根斯坦在生命的尽头寻找确定性,而纽比金则在寻找适当的自信。一方面,他们都反对笛卡尔式的现代性的不容置疑的确定性,另一方面,他们也反对许多晚期现代性流派对真理可能性的否定。在批判性地肯定这两位不同思想家的一些关键论点的同时,我也看到了在后基础主义和批判现实主义认识论的见解的帮助下支持他们新兴认识论计划的重要性。很明显,不用说,这个大任务只能在1小时的演讲中概述和概述,而不是仔细研究任何细节!我的演讲更多的是邀请交谈,而不是任何一种已完成的项目。我将首先与两位主角对话。此后,在对神学和信仰的意义进行总结性反思之前,我们试图对后基础主义和批判现实主义的意义和本质进行简要的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信