Recognizing work: Respect and professionalism among activist domestic workers following passage of the New York City Domestic Worker Bill of Rights

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Alana Lee Glaser
{"title":"Recognizing work: Respect and professionalism among activist domestic workers following passage of the New York City Domestic Worker Bill of Rights","authors":"Alana Lee Glaser","doi":"10.1111/awr.12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2010, New York State passed the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, the first-ever US legislation protecting home-based workers. Although the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights represented a significant change to US labor law and in the lives of workers and activists who made its passage possible, relatively few of New York's domestic workers were aware of the new regulations governing their work after its implementation. The domestic worker activists who fought for its passage, instead, describe the bill as recognizing the legitimacy and visibility of reproductive work, reversing what they understand as centuries of racist norms proscribing their labor. These activist nannies and caretakers of older adults draw on idioms of professionalism to validate claims for the dignity of domestic work even as they regard the protections afforded by the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights as an inadequate first step toward meaningfully improving their employment sector. In this article, I draw on Nancy Fraser's critical theory of recognition to grapple with the afterlife of the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":"45 2","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2010, New York State passed the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, the first-ever US legislation protecting home-based workers. Although the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights represented a significant change to US labor law and in the lives of workers and activists who made its passage possible, relatively few of New York's domestic workers were aware of the new regulations governing their work after its implementation. The domestic worker activists who fought for its passage, instead, describe the bill as recognizing the legitimacy and visibility of reproductive work, reversing what they understand as centuries of racist norms proscribing their labor. These activist nannies and caretakers of older adults draw on idioms of professionalism to validate claims for the dignity of domestic work even as they regard the protections afforded by the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights as an inadequate first step toward meaningfully improving their employment sector. In this article, I draw on Nancy Fraser's critical theory of recognition to grapple with the afterlife of the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights.

承认工作:在纽约市家庭工人权利法案通过后,激进家庭工人的尊重和专业精神
2010年,纽约州通过了《家庭佣工权利法案》,这是美国第一部保护家庭佣工的立法。虽然《家庭佣工权利法案》代表了美国劳动法的重大变化,也代表了使法案通过成为可能的工人和活动人士生活的重大变化,但在法案实施后,相对较少的纽约家庭佣工意识到管理他们工作的新规定。相反,为该法案争取通过的家政工人活动人士称,该法案承认了生殖工作的合法性和可见性,扭转了他们所理解的几个世纪以来禁止她们劳动的种族主义规范。这些活跃的保姆和老年人看护人利用专业用语来证明家政工作的尊严,尽管她们认为《家政工人权利法案》(domestic Worker Bill of Rights)所提供的保护,在有意义地改善她们的就业领域方面还不够充分。在这篇文章中,我借鉴南希·弗雷泽(Nancy Fraser)的认知批判理论,来探讨《家政工人权利法案》(Domestic Worker Bill of Rights)的来生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信