Contextualizing guidelines for the health system of Cyprus: Experiences and lessons learnt

Panayiotis Kouis, Hugh McGuire, Monika Kyriacou, Anneza Yiallourou, Anastasis Sioftanos, Ourania Kolokotroni, Haris Achilleos, Craig Grime, Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Giorgos Giallouros, Christina Englezou, Contextualization group, Panayiotis K. Yiallouros, Georgios K. Nikolopoulos
{"title":"Contextualizing guidelines for the health system of Cyprus: Experiences and lessons learnt","authors":"Panayiotis Kouis,&nbsp;Hugh McGuire,&nbsp;Monika Kyriacou,&nbsp;Anneza Yiallourou,&nbsp;Anastasis Sioftanos,&nbsp;Ourania Kolokotroni,&nbsp;Haris Achilleos,&nbsp;Craig Grime,&nbsp;Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez,&nbsp;Giorgos Giallouros,&nbsp;Christina Englezou,&nbsp;Contextualization group,&nbsp;Panayiotis K. Yiallouros,&nbsp;Georgios K. Nikolopoulos","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cyprus is undergoing a major health reform with the recent establishment of the General Healthcare System (GHS). The GHS offers equal healthcare access through one primary insurer (Health Insurance Organization [HIO]) and benefits from a wide collaborative network of public and private healthcare providers. However, unwanted variation in practice makes this transition challenging. Healthcare guidelines could decrease these variations in practice, but Cyprus lacks the capacity to develop them de novo. Through a collaboration with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom, the contextualization of NICE guidelines and the derivation of local quality indicators are carried out. This study presents the methodology and experience of contextualizing the first three NICE guidelines and deriving associated quality indicators in Cyprus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>HIO managed the guideline contextualization with the support of a Guidelines Secretariat. For each guideline, a local topic expert committee (TEC) was recruited. Through a series of meetings, followed by public consultation, each TEC made contextual changes to the guideline and derived relevant quality indicators. During this process, NICE assured quality by overseeing several elements of the contextualization procedure such as TEC membership, proposed changes and justification and derived quality indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2022 and 2024, three NICE guidelines, NG196 on Atrial fibrillation (AF), NG230 on Thyroid cancer (TC) and NG203 on Chronic kidney disease (CKD), were contextualized through the modification of several individual guideline recommendations (21/79 [26.6%] in AF, 37/67 [55.2%] in TC and 62/217 [28.6%] in CKD). In parallel, NICE quality indicators were screened for applicability and feasibility in Cyprus while additional indicators were developed if required.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In a country with limited experience in guideline development, a supervised and systematic process supported by an established organization ensures quality, is less resource intensive and builds capability for the sustainability of the process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cyprus is undergoing a major health reform with the recent establishment of the General Healthcare System (GHS). The GHS offers equal healthcare access through one primary insurer (Health Insurance Organization [HIO]) and benefits from a wide collaborative network of public and private healthcare providers. However, unwanted variation in practice makes this transition challenging. Healthcare guidelines could decrease these variations in practice, but Cyprus lacks the capacity to develop them de novo. Through a collaboration with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom, the contextualization of NICE guidelines and the derivation of local quality indicators are carried out. This study presents the methodology and experience of contextualizing the first three NICE guidelines and deriving associated quality indicators in Cyprus.

Methods

HIO managed the guideline contextualization with the support of a Guidelines Secretariat. For each guideline, a local topic expert committee (TEC) was recruited. Through a series of meetings, followed by public consultation, each TEC made contextual changes to the guideline and derived relevant quality indicators. During this process, NICE assured quality by overseeing several elements of the contextualization procedure such as TEC membership, proposed changes and justification and derived quality indicators.

Results

Between 2022 and 2024, three NICE guidelines, NG196 on Atrial fibrillation (AF), NG230 on Thyroid cancer (TC) and NG203 on Chronic kidney disease (CKD), were contextualized through the modification of several individual guideline recommendations (21/79 [26.6%] in AF, 37/67 [55.2%] in TC and 62/217 [28.6%] in CKD). In parallel, NICE quality indicators were screened for applicability and feasibility in Cyprus while additional indicators were developed if required.

Conclusion

In a country with limited experience in guideline development, a supervised and systematic process supported by an established organization ensures quality, is less resource intensive and builds capability for the sustainability of the process.

Abstract Image

塞浦路斯卫生系统的背景指导方针:经验和教训
塞浦路斯正在进行一项重大的卫生改革,最近建立了一般医疗保健系统(GHS)。GHS通过一个主要保险公司(健康保险组织[HIO])提供平等的医疗保健服务,并从公共和私人医疗保健提供者的广泛合作网络中受益。然而,实践中不需要的变化使这种转变具有挑战性。保健准则可以在实践中减少这些差异,但塞浦路斯缺乏重新制定这些准则的能力。通过与联合王国国家健康和护理卓越研究所(NICE)的合作,将NICE的指导方针与当地质量指标结合起来。本研究介绍了将前三个NICE指导方针置于背景下的方法和经验,并在塞浦路斯得出相关的质量指标。方法HIO在指南秘书处的支持下管理指南的语境化。针对每一项指南,都招募了一个地方专题专家委员会(TEC)。通过一系列会议和公众协商,每个过渡时期行政委员会都对准则作出了具体的修改,并得出了有关的质量指标。在此过程中,NICE通过监督情境化程序的几个要素来保证质量,例如TEC成员资格,提议的变更和理由以及派生的质量指标。在2022年至2024年间,三个NICE指南NG196关于房颤(AF), NG230关于甲状腺癌(TC)和NG203关于慢性肾脏疾病(CKD),通过修改几个单独的指南建议(AF 21/79 [26.6%], TC 37/67[55.2%]和CKD 62/217[28.6%])进行了背景化。与此同时,对NICE质量指标在塞浦路斯的适用性和可行性进行了筛选,并根据需要制定了其他指标。结论:在指南制定经验有限的国家,由成熟组织支持的监督和系统过程可确保质量,减少资源密集型,并为该过程的可持续性建立能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信