What counts as “quality” in agrarian taste? Subjectivities, gender, and rice agroecology in northern Bangladesh

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Abdullah Al Mozahid
{"title":"What counts as “quality” in agrarian taste? Subjectivities, gender, and rice agroecology in northern Bangladesh","authors":"Abdullah Al Mozahid","doi":"10.1111/cuag.12323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This ethnographic study explores perceptions of the <i>quality</i> or <i>goodness</i> of rice among two agrarian communities in northern Bangladesh. In Bangladeshi rice markets, socio-cultural perceptions of the appearance and texture of rice are seen to determine the quality and taste of rice. This paper foregrounds the invisible actors—the embodied ways of knowing and practicing of <i>rural agrarian workers</i>—to unravel how they perceive, appreciate, and interpret the quality of rice across gendered and classed body politics. Evidence from the practical and relational aspects of their eating habits suggests that the eater's sensory experience of quality and tastiness is grounded on how the rice grains are grown and processed. Qualification is a continuous process that awakens the eating body's active participation in the experience of cooking, eating, and metabolism. By introducing the idea of <i>agrarian taste</i>, this study presents a new way of understanding how rural agrarian workers preserve the complex and rhizomatic embodied knowledge on the authenticity and adulteration of the qualities of rice and brings new insight into the scholarship of food, nutrition, agriculture, and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54150,"journal":{"name":"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment","volume":"46 2","pages":"88-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Agriculture Food and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cuag.12323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This ethnographic study explores perceptions of the quality or goodness of rice among two agrarian communities in northern Bangladesh. In Bangladeshi rice markets, socio-cultural perceptions of the appearance and texture of rice are seen to determine the quality and taste of rice. This paper foregrounds the invisible actors—the embodied ways of knowing and practicing of rural agrarian workers—to unravel how they perceive, appreciate, and interpret the quality of rice across gendered and classed body politics. Evidence from the practical and relational aspects of their eating habits suggests that the eater's sensory experience of quality and tastiness is grounded on how the rice grains are grown and processed. Qualification is a continuous process that awakens the eating body's active participation in the experience of cooking, eating, and metabolism. By introducing the idea of agrarian taste, this study presents a new way of understanding how rural agrarian workers preserve the complex and rhizomatic embodied knowledge on the authenticity and adulteration of the qualities of rice and brings new insight into the scholarship of food, nutrition, agriculture, and the environment.

在农民的品味中,什么才算“质量”?孟加拉国北部的主体性、性别与水稻农业生态
这项民族志研究探讨了孟加拉国北部两个农业社区对大米质量或好坏的看法。在孟加拉国的大米市场,人们认为社会文化对大米外观和质地的看法决定了大米的质量和味道。本文从无形的行动者——农村农民的具体认识和实践方式——出发,揭示他们如何感知、欣赏和解释大米的质量,跨越性别和阶级的身体政治。来自他们饮食习惯的实际和相关方面的证据表明,食客对质量和味道的感官体验是基于大米的种植和加工方式。资格认证是一个持续不断的过程,它唤醒进食身体积极参与烹饪、进食和新陈代谢的体验。通过引入“农民口味”的概念,本研究为理解农村农民如何保存有关大米品质真实性和掺假的复杂和根茎化知识提供了一种新的途径,并为食品,营养,农业和环境的学术研究带来了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment
Culture Agriculture Food and Environment AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信