A False Positive Resilient Distributed Trust Management Framework for Collaborative Intrusion Detection Systems

IF 5.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Kadhim Hayawi;Imran Makhdoom;Saifullah Khalid;Richard Adeyemi Ikuesan;Mohammed Kaosar;Ishfaq Ahmad
{"title":"A False Positive Resilient Distributed Trust Management Framework for Collaborative Intrusion Detection Systems","authors":"Kadhim Hayawi;Imran Makhdoom;Saifullah Khalid;Richard Adeyemi Ikuesan;Mohammed Kaosar;Ishfaq Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/TSC.2025.3539202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative Intrusion Detection System (CIDS) protect large networks against distributed attacks. However, a CIDS is vulnerable to insider attacks that decrease the mutual trust among the CIDS nodes. Most existing trust management approaches rely on a central authority, trusted third parties or network peers for managing trust. The current techniques are prone to high false positives and vulnerable to various reputation attacks. For instance, device attestation manages trust among CIDS nodes by verifying the integrity of a node’s hardware and software configuration. However, it lacks real-time monitoring of the dynamic state, limiting its effectiveness against ongoing attacks and malware. Therefore, incorporating the system’s dynamic state in the trust framework is crucial, but it causes false positives requiring corrective mechanisms. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a blockchain-based integrated trust management framework for CIDS, incorporating the device’s genome attestation, the system’s dynamic parameters, and a false positive resilient reputation mechanism. By storing the reputation scores on the blockchain, the framework alleviates the need for a third party for trust management and thus mitigates attacks applicable to reputation-based systems. The paper performs a comprehensive security and performance analysis of the proposed framework to gauge its efficiency and study the effects of a penalty on a node’s reputation during the recovery and rally phases. We also study the impact of false positives on the reputation of a node. The results show that Hyperledger Fabric offers lower transaction latency and low CPU utilization compared to Ethereum Blockchain.","PeriodicalId":13255,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Services Computing","volume":"18 2","pages":"513-526"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Services Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10874202/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative Intrusion Detection System (CIDS) protect large networks against distributed attacks. However, a CIDS is vulnerable to insider attacks that decrease the mutual trust among the CIDS nodes. Most existing trust management approaches rely on a central authority, trusted third parties or network peers for managing trust. The current techniques are prone to high false positives and vulnerable to various reputation attacks. For instance, device attestation manages trust among CIDS nodes by verifying the integrity of a node’s hardware and software configuration. However, it lacks real-time monitoring of the dynamic state, limiting its effectiveness against ongoing attacks and malware. Therefore, incorporating the system’s dynamic state in the trust framework is crucial, but it causes false positives requiring corrective mechanisms. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a blockchain-based integrated trust management framework for CIDS, incorporating the device’s genome attestation, the system’s dynamic parameters, and a false positive resilient reputation mechanism. By storing the reputation scores on the blockchain, the framework alleviates the need for a third party for trust management and thus mitigates attacks applicable to reputation-based systems. The paper performs a comprehensive security and performance analysis of the proposed framework to gauge its efficiency and study the effects of a penalty on a node’s reputation during the recovery and rally phases. We also study the impact of false positives on the reputation of a node. The results show that Hyperledger Fabric offers lower transaction latency and low CPU utilization compared to Ethereum Blockchain.
用于协作式入侵检测系统的抗假阳性分布式信任管理框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
278
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing encompasses the computing and software aspects of the science and technology of services innovation research and development. It places emphasis on algorithmic, mathematical, statistical, and computational methods central to services computing. Topics covered include Service Oriented Architecture, Web Services, Business Process Integration, Solution Performance Management, and Services Operations and Management. The transactions address mathematical foundations, security, privacy, agreement, contract, discovery, negotiation, collaboration, and quality of service for web services. It also covers areas like composite web service creation, business and scientific applications, standards, utility models, business process modeling, integration, collaboration, and more in the realm of Services Computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信