Accuracy of tactile bougie use in infrequent intubators: a cadaveric airway study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Adam Parks, Megi Nallbani, Judah Goldstein, Cory A Munroe, Janel Swain, Sebastien Hebert, Brett Barro, George Kovacs
{"title":"Accuracy of tactile bougie use in infrequent intubators: a cadaveric airway study.","authors":"Adam Parks, Megi Nallbani, Judah Goldstein, Cory A Munroe, Janel Swain, Sebastien Hebert, Brett Barro, George Kovacs","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02908-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When difficulty with laryngoscopy is encountered, confirmation of endotracheal access can be confirmed using the tactile feedback (i.e., tracheal clicks) of a tracheal tube introducer (bougie). There is anecdotal evidence that a bougie placed in the esophagus may have a unique, tactile \"boggy\" resistance. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the sensitivity and specificity of clicks and boggy resistance for infrequent airway providers in cadaveric airways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study using descriptive statistics to examine the diagnostic accuracy of clicks and boggy resistance for bougies placed in cadaveric airways. We recruited prehospital providers from within Atlantic Canada who then underwent a brief formal training protocol. Cadavers were equipped with a static laryngoscope and bougie (placed either in the trachea or esophagus). Each participant, blinded to bougie placement, was then tested on two separate cadavers and asked whether they felt clicks and/or boggy resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven paramedics participated in the study (32 advanced care paramedics, five critical care paramedics) and were randomized to perform 74 bougie assessments on cadaveric airways. For tracheal clicks, we calculated an overall sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75 to 98) and an overall specificity of 81% (95% CI, 68 to 94). Sensitivity for the esophageal boggy resistance test was 78% (95% CI, 65 to 92) while specificity was 86% (95% CI, 75 to 98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following a brief training session, prehospital providers who intubate infrequently seemed to show a relatively high degree of accuracy using tracheal clicks and esophageal boggy resistance to confirm bougie placement in cadaveric airways.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02908-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: When difficulty with laryngoscopy is encountered, confirmation of endotracheal access can be confirmed using the tactile feedback (i.e., tracheal clicks) of a tracheal tube introducer (bougie). There is anecdotal evidence that a bougie placed in the esophagus may have a unique, tactile "boggy" resistance. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the sensitivity and specificity of clicks and boggy resistance for infrequent airway providers in cadaveric airways.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study using descriptive statistics to examine the diagnostic accuracy of clicks and boggy resistance for bougies placed in cadaveric airways. We recruited prehospital providers from within Atlantic Canada who then underwent a brief formal training protocol. Cadavers were equipped with a static laryngoscope and bougie (placed either in the trachea or esophagus). Each participant, blinded to bougie placement, was then tested on two separate cadavers and asked whether they felt clicks and/or boggy resistance.

Results: Thirty-seven paramedics participated in the study (32 advanced care paramedics, five critical care paramedics) and were randomized to perform 74 bougie assessments on cadaveric airways. For tracheal clicks, we calculated an overall sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75 to 98) and an overall specificity of 81% (95% CI, 68 to 94). Sensitivity for the esophageal boggy resistance test was 78% (95% CI, 65 to 92) while specificity was 86% (95% CI, 75 to 98).

Conclusion: Following a brief training session, prehospital providers who intubate infrequently seemed to show a relatively high degree of accuracy using tracheal clicks and esophageal boggy resistance to confirm bougie placement in cadaveric airways.

不经常插管者使用触摸式通气导管的准确性:尸体气道研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信