Obstetric care under the military health system: An analysis of active-duty women's and female spouses' online discussions.

Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.4081/qrmh.2024.12641
Amanda M Rebhi
{"title":"Obstetric care under the military health system: An analysis of active-duty women's and female spouses' online discussions.","authors":"Amanda M Rebhi","doi":"10.4081/qrmh.2024.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research undertakes a thematic analysis of discussion threads on social media forums to determine women's perceptions of quality of obstetric care under TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Select. Following an open coding process and thematic analysis, themes arose regarding obstetric care as experienced by active-duty women as well as female spouses of active-duty members. Themes surrounding active-duty perceptions of quality of obstetric care concerned proximity to care deferred deliveries, lack of care options, deficient on-base care, better civilian care experiences, and lamenting having less options than spouses. Spouses generated themes of positive connotation with TRICARE Select, including low costs, freedom of choice, and proximity to care and negative connotation with TRICARE Prime, such as difficulty getting care, process bureaucracy, and deficient care. Ample evidence pointed to a strong spouse preference for TRICARE Select over TRICARE Prime, but there was not enough evidence to indicate if active-duty women were pursuing out-of-pocket care to circumvent TRICARE Prime restrictions. Overall, women's discussions point to a need to improve the Military Health System and concerningly suggest active-duty women are confined to care within a system plagued with issues that impact obstetric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74623,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare","volume":"8 3","pages":"12641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2024.12641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research undertakes a thematic analysis of discussion threads on social media forums to determine women's perceptions of quality of obstetric care under TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Select. Following an open coding process and thematic analysis, themes arose regarding obstetric care as experienced by active-duty women as well as female spouses of active-duty members. Themes surrounding active-duty perceptions of quality of obstetric care concerned proximity to care deferred deliveries, lack of care options, deficient on-base care, better civilian care experiences, and lamenting having less options than spouses. Spouses generated themes of positive connotation with TRICARE Select, including low costs, freedom of choice, and proximity to care and negative connotation with TRICARE Prime, such as difficulty getting care, process bureaucracy, and deficient care. Ample evidence pointed to a strong spouse preference for TRICARE Select over TRICARE Prime, but there was not enough evidence to indicate if active-duty women were pursuing out-of-pocket care to circumvent TRICARE Prime restrictions. Overall, women's discussions point to a need to improve the Military Health System and concerningly suggest active-duty women are confined to care within a system plagued with issues that impact obstetric care.

军队医疗系统下的产科护理:对现役女性和女性配偶在线讨论的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信