Infant-Led Incubator Weaning: A Promising Paradigm Shift in Preterm Neonatal Care.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235
Jennifer Rath, Lauren A Stracuzzi, Sarah E Wawrzynski, Catherine Haut
{"title":"Infant-Led Incubator Weaning: A Promising Paradigm Shift in Preterm Neonatal Care.","authors":"Jennifer Rath, Lauren A Stracuzzi, Sarah E Wawrzynski, Catherine Haut","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermoregulation is paramount in preterm infant care, traditionally addressed through nurse-led incubator weaning protocols. Recent research has introduced infant-driven incubator protocols that are demonstrating promise.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study, conducted at a freestanding academic pediatric hospital in the mid-Atlantic, examined the impact of infant-led incubator weaning on a specific neonatal cohort. The primary hypothesis posited that infants in the infant-led weaning group would wean out of the incubator at earlier gestational ages and lower weights, while maintaining comparable or greater weight gain during the transition to open cribs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review compared 40 infants weighing less than 1500 g before and after a weaning protocol change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infant-led weaning demonstrated lower weights at weaning to crib ( M = 1836.80 g) compared with nurse-led weaning ( M = 1975.9 g), with statistical significance ( t [36] = 2.27, P =  .02, Cohen's d = 0.74). Infants in the infant-led group had a lower weight change 5 days prior to weaning ( M =  141 g) compared with the nurse-led group ( M =  185 g), which is also statistically significant ( t [36] = 1.93, P =  .03, Cohen's d = 0.63). T-tests revealed no significant differences in gestational age at wean to crib, change in weight post-weaning, gestational age, or days to discharge.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>Infant-led weaning emerges as a safe alternative with potential benefits for preterm neonates and their families. While initial positive outcomes are evident, further research with a larger neonatal cohort is imperative to validate the efficacy of infant-led weaning as a successful alternative to traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thermoregulation is paramount in preterm infant care, traditionally addressed through nurse-led incubator weaning protocols. Recent research has introduced infant-driven incubator protocols that are demonstrating promise.

Purpose: This study, conducted at a freestanding academic pediatric hospital in the mid-Atlantic, examined the impact of infant-led incubator weaning on a specific neonatal cohort. The primary hypothesis posited that infants in the infant-led weaning group would wean out of the incubator at earlier gestational ages and lower weights, while maintaining comparable or greater weight gain during the transition to open cribs.

Methods: A retrospective chart review compared 40 infants weighing less than 1500 g before and after a weaning protocol change.

Results: Infant-led weaning demonstrated lower weights at weaning to crib ( M = 1836.80 g) compared with nurse-led weaning ( M = 1975.9 g), with statistical significance ( t [36] = 2.27, P =  .02, Cohen's d = 0.74). Infants in the infant-led group had a lower weight change 5 days prior to weaning ( M =  141 g) compared with the nurse-led group ( M =  185 g), which is also statistically significant ( t [36] = 1.93, P =  .03, Cohen's d = 0.63). T-tests revealed no significant differences in gestational age at wean to crib, change in weight post-weaning, gestational age, or days to discharge.

Implications for practice and research: Infant-led weaning emerges as a safe alternative with potential benefits for preterm neonates and their families. While initial positive outcomes are evident, further research with a larger neonatal cohort is imperative to validate the efficacy of infant-led weaning as a successful alternative to traditional methods.

婴儿主导的孵化器断奶:一个有希望的范式转变在早产儿护理。
背景:体温调节在早产儿护理中是至关重要的,传统上通过护士主导的培养箱断奶方案来解决。最近的研究介绍了婴儿驱动的孵化器协议,显示出前景。目的:本研究在大西洋中部的一家独立学术儿科医院进行,研究了婴儿主导的恒温箱断奶对特定新生儿队列的影响。主要的假设是,婴儿主导断奶组的婴儿会在更早的胎龄和更低的体重中断奶,同时在过渡到开放式婴儿床期间保持相当或更大的体重增加。方法:对40名体重低于1500克的婴儿在断奶方案改变前后进行回顾性图表回顾。结果:婴儿引导断奶仔猪断奶到婴儿床时体重(M = 1836.80 g)低于护士引导断奶仔猪(M = 1975.9 g),差异有统计学意义(t [36] = 2.27, P = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.74)。婴儿引导组断奶前5天体重变化(M = 141 g)低于护士引导组(M = 185 g),差异有统计学意义(t [36] = 1.93, P = 0.03, Cohen’s d = 0.63)。t检验显示,从断奶到婴儿床的胎龄、断奶后体重变化、胎龄或出院天数没有显著差异。对实践和研究的启示:婴儿主导断奶作为一种安全的选择,对早产儿及其家庭有潜在的好处。虽然最初的积极结果是明显的,但进一步的研究需要更大的新生儿队列来验证婴儿主导断奶作为传统方法的成功替代方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信