Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000781
Charles Klose, Ingrid L Rodgers, Eric Qualkenbush, Andrew Zganjar, Emily Brennan, Aaron Spaulding, David Thiel, Evan Gibbs, Michael A Edwards
{"title":"Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy.","authors":"Charles Klose, Ingrid L Rodgers, Eric Qualkenbush, Andrew Zganjar, Emily Brennan, Aaron Spaulding, David Thiel, Evan Gibbs, Michael A Edwards","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after urologic surgery occurs in approximately 1% of patients and is associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality. Given variability in thromboprophylaxis practice, we aim to analyze the utilization of Caprini risk-based thromboprophylaxis after prostatectomy and nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases were identified using the medical record from large tertiary care centers in the United States. Caprini score was calculated retrospectively. Prophylaxis was classified as either appropriate or inappropriate when comparing Caprini score recommendations with prophylaxis received. Bleeding was determined by International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic code, postoperative hemoglobin decrease of > 4 g/dL, or transfusion. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses compared VTE and bleeding outcomes between prophylaxis cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 6241 patients analyzed, inpatient, postoperative VTE rate was 0.72%. Appropriate inpatient prophylaxis was received by 36% of prostatectomy patients and 50% of nephrectomy patients. Less than 5% of patients in both cohorts received recommended appropriate discharge prophylaxis. Appropriate inpatient prophylaxis after prostatectomy resulted in an 8-fold significant reduction in inpatient VTE (0.07% vs 0.61%, <i>P</i> = .009) with an associated increased bleeding incidence (2.3% vs 0.98%, <i>P</i> < .001). The incidence of inpatient VTE after radical nephrectomy was 5.8-fold higher (1.7% vs 0.29%, <i>P</i> = .001) with inappropriate prophylaxis without a significant increased risk of bleeding. There was no significant difference in VTE rates or bleeding at 90 days postoperatively when stratifying by discharge prophylaxis in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For those identified as high risk by Caprini score, the benefits of inpatient VTE chemoprophylaxis must be balanced with bleeding risk after prostatectomy and nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"343-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after urologic surgery occurs in approximately 1% of patients and is associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality. Given variability in thromboprophylaxis practice, we aim to analyze the utilization of Caprini risk-based thromboprophylaxis after prostatectomy and nephrectomy.

Methods: Cases were identified using the medical record from large tertiary care centers in the United States. Caprini score was calculated retrospectively. Prophylaxis was classified as either appropriate or inappropriate when comparing Caprini score recommendations with prophylaxis received. Bleeding was determined by International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic code, postoperative hemoglobin decrease of > 4 g/dL, or transfusion. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses compared VTE and bleeding outcomes between prophylaxis cohorts.

Results: In the 6241 patients analyzed, inpatient, postoperative VTE rate was 0.72%. Appropriate inpatient prophylaxis was received by 36% of prostatectomy patients and 50% of nephrectomy patients. Less than 5% of patients in both cohorts received recommended appropriate discharge prophylaxis. Appropriate inpatient prophylaxis after prostatectomy resulted in an 8-fold significant reduction in inpatient VTE (0.07% vs 0.61%, P = .009) with an associated increased bleeding incidence (2.3% vs 0.98%, P < .001). The incidence of inpatient VTE after radical nephrectomy was 5.8-fold higher (1.7% vs 0.29%, P = .001) with inappropriate prophylaxis without a significant increased risk of bleeding. There was no significant difference in VTE rates or bleeding at 90 days postoperatively when stratifying by discharge prophylaxis in either cohort.

Conclusions: For those identified as high risk by Caprini score, the benefits of inpatient VTE chemoprophylaxis must be balanced with bleeding risk after prostatectomy and nephrectomy.

根治性前列腺切除术和肾切除术后采用卡普里尼评分推荐的血栓预防措施的风险和益处。
导语:泌尿外科手术后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率约为1%,并与围手术期发病率和死亡率相关。鉴于血栓预防实践的可变性,我们的目的是分析前列腺切除术和肾切除术后基于capriini风险的血栓预防的应用。材料和方法:使用美国大型三级保健中心的医疗记录确定病例。回顾性计算capriini评分。当比较卡普里尼评分建议和接受的预防措施时,预防措施被分类为适当或不适当。根据ICD-10诊断代码、术后血红蛋白降低bbb40 g/dL或输血判断出血。双变量和多变量回归分析比较了静脉血栓栓塞和出血的预防队列之间的结果。结果:6241例患者中,住院、术后静脉血栓栓塞率为0.72%。36%的前列腺切除术患者和50%的肾切除术患者接受了适当的住院预防。两组患者中均不到5%的患者接受了推荐的适当出院预防。前列腺切除术后适当的住院预防导致住院静脉血栓栓塞发生率显著降低8倍(0.07% vs. 0.61%, p=0.009),同时出血发生率增加(2.3% vs. 0.98%)。结论:对于那些被capriini评分确定为高风险的患者,住院静脉血栓栓塞化疗预防的益处必须与前列腺切除术和肾切除术后的出血风险相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信