Molecular markers enhance substantially the distinctness of alfalfa varieties for registration and protection.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Plant Genome Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/tpg2.20556
Paolo Annicchiarico, Nicolò Franguelli, Barbara Ferrari, Giacomo Campanella, Stefano Gualanduzzi, Margherita Crosta, Chiara Delogu, Giorgia Spataro, Nelson Nazzicari
{"title":"Molecular markers enhance substantially the distinctness of alfalfa varieties for registration and protection.","authors":"Paolo Annicchiarico, Nicolò Franguelli, Barbara Ferrari, Giacomo Campanella, Stefano Gualanduzzi, Margherita Crosta, Chiara Delogu, Giorgia Spataro, Nelson Nazzicari","doi":"10.1002/tpg2.20556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant varieties must satisfy distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) requirements for registration. Morphophysiological trait-based distinctness may be challenging for cultivars of major perennial forages. Our study focused on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa) with the aims of (a) comparing morphophysiological distinctness with molecular distinctness based on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) or the alfalfa DArTag panel, envisaging different statistical criteria for molecular distinctness, and (b) assessing the consistency of morphophysiological and molecular cultivar diversity. The 18 most grown Italian varieties were jointly reevaluated morphophysiologically and were characterized molecularly using three bulked DNA samples of 200 independent genotypes per cultivar. Morphophysiological distinctness was limited by correlations between traits and resulted in 39 non-distinct cultivars in 153 paired comparisons and three cultivars distinct from any other. Best configurations for molecular distinctness featured about 10-fold more polymorphic markers and 10-fold lower average read depth per marker for GBS compared to DArTag. DArTag markers allowed for somewhat better variety distinction than GBS. They reduced to 11 the non-distinct cultivars in paired comparisons and increased to 11 the completely distinct cultivars, based on a principal components analysis of allele frequencies followed by analyses of variance on cultivar principal component scores. This criterion achieved greater variety distinctness than cluster analysis with bootstrap values, discriminant analysis, or analysis of molecular variance. Morphophysiologically distinct cultivars were generally distinct molecularly, but not the reverse. Mantel's test revealed a modest consistency across morphophysiological and DArTag (r = 0.39) or GBS-based (r = 0.46) measures of cultivar Euclidean distance. Our results and other considerations strongly encourage the adoption of molecular distinctness for alfalfa DUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49002,"journal":{"name":"Plant Genome","volume":"18 1","pages":"e20556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Genome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant varieties must satisfy distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) requirements for registration. Morphophysiological trait-based distinctness may be challenging for cultivars of major perennial forages. Our study focused on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa) with the aims of (a) comparing morphophysiological distinctness with molecular distinctness based on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) or the alfalfa DArTag panel, envisaging different statistical criteria for molecular distinctness, and (b) assessing the consistency of morphophysiological and molecular cultivar diversity. The 18 most grown Italian varieties were jointly reevaluated morphophysiologically and were characterized molecularly using three bulked DNA samples of 200 independent genotypes per cultivar. Morphophysiological distinctness was limited by correlations between traits and resulted in 39 non-distinct cultivars in 153 paired comparisons and three cultivars distinct from any other. Best configurations for molecular distinctness featured about 10-fold more polymorphic markers and 10-fold lower average read depth per marker for GBS compared to DArTag. DArTag markers allowed for somewhat better variety distinction than GBS. They reduced to 11 the non-distinct cultivars in paired comparisons and increased to 11 the completely distinct cultivars, based on a principal components analysis of allele frequencies followed by analyses of variance on cultivar principal component scores. This criterion achieved greater variety distinctness than cluster analysis with bootstrap values, discriminant analysis, or analysis of molecular variance. Morphophysiologically distinct cultivars were generally distinct molecularly, but not the reverse. Mantel's test revealed a modest consistency across morphophysiological and DArTag (r = 0.39) or GBS-based (r = 0.46) measures of cultivar Euclidean distance. Our results and other considerations strongly encourage the adoption of molecular distinctness for alfalfa DUS.

分子标记在苜蓿品种注册和保护中具有显著的增强作用。
植物品种注册必须满足独特性、均匀性和稳定性(DUS)要求。对主要多年生牧草品种来说,基于形态生理特性的独特性可能是一个挑战。本研究以紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L. subsp.)为研究对象。目的是(a)比较基于基因分型测序(GBS)或苜蓿DArTag面板的形态生理独特性与分子独特性,设想不同的分子独特性统计标准,以及(b)评估形态生理和分子品种多样性的一致性。对意大利种植最多的18个品种进行形态生理学重新评估,并利用每个品种200个独立基因型的3个大体积DNA样本进行分子表征。形态生理差异受性状间相关性的限制,153个配对比较中有39个品种不明显,3个品种与其他品种不同。与DArTag相比,GBS的最佳配置具有多态标记的10倍,每个标记的平均读取深度低10倍。与GBS相比,DArTag标记允许更好的品种区分。他们根据等位基因频率的主成分分析和品种主成分得分的方差分析,在配对比较中将非显著性品种减少到11个,将完全显著性品种增加到11个。该标准比使用自举值、判别分析或分子方差分析的聚类分析获得了更大的品种显著性。形态生理上不同的品种一般在分子上不同,反之则不然。Mantel的检验显示,形态生理学和DArTag (r = 0.39)或基于gps (r = 0.46)的品种欧几里得距离测量值之间存在适度的一致性。我们的结果和其他考虑强烈鼓励采用分子特异性的紫花苜蓿DUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Genome
Plant Genome PLANT SCIENCES-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Plant Genome publishes original research investigating all aspects of plant genomics. Technical breakthroughs reporting improvements in the efficiency and speed of acquiring and interpreting plant genomics data are welcome. The editorial board gives preference to novel reports that use innovative genomic applications that advance our understanding of plant biology that may have applications to crop improvement. The journal also publishes invited review articles and perspectives that offer insight and commentary on recent advances in genomics and their potential for agronomic improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信